NCT05942066

Brief Summary

The goal of this feasibility study is to evaluate a new sample preparator called See.d. After blood processing the instrument will produce a set of slides and a tube of plasma. These outputs could be used in further analysis in liquid biopsy applications.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
14mo left

Started Oct 2023

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress69%
Oct 2023Jul 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 15, 2023

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 12, 2023

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 9, 2023

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2027

Last Updated

February 12, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.7 years

First QC Date

June 15, 2023

Last Update Submit

February 9, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Whole BloodLiquid BiopsyPlasmaWhite Blood CellsPre-Analytical Standardization

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • SBS slides stability

    Evaluation of the area of adhered cell nuclei on SBS slides

    1 day (at the blood draw)

  • Reagents stability

    Evaluation of total adhered cell count on SBS slides

    1 day (at the blood draw)

  • cfDNA quality control

    Evaluation of the ratio between cfDNA and genomic contaminant DNA

    1 day (at the blood draw)

  • Feasibility of staining on slides produced by See.d

    Qualitative assessment of staining positivity

    1 day (at the blood draw)

  • Feasibility of using See.d SBS slides for subsequent analysis

    Recovery of mock-Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs)

    1 day (at the blood draw)

  • Feasibility of using See.d plasma for subsequent analysis

    Recovery of spiked reference DNA

    1 day (at the blood draw)

Study Arms (1)

Healthy donors

Participants who are in good health and willing to provide a blood sample

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Blood samples to be used in this clinical study will be collected from healthy volunteers, already willing to become blood donors and, for this reason, already going to be subjected to a venipuncture and a blood draw to evaluate their eligibility to blood donation

You may qualify if:

  • Participants are willing and able to give and sign a written informed consent
  • Aged 18 or above

You may not qualify if:

  • Ongoing infections requiring antibiotic or antiviral treatment
  • Known hemostasis/coagulation disorder
  • Known Pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ospedale San Raffaele

Milan, 20132, Italy

RECRUITING

Related Publications (10)

  • Alix-Panabieres C, Pantel K. Liquid Biopsy: From Discovery to Clinical Application. Cancer Discov. 2021 Apr;11(4):858-873. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1311.

    PMID: 33811121BACKGROUND
  • Xie S, Wang Y, Gong Z, Li Y, Yang W, Liu G, Li J, Hu X, Wang Y, Tong Y, Yuan P, Si Y, Kang Y, Mao Y, Qi X, Liu Y, Ou J, Li Z, Pan X, Lv Z, Kaji K, Guo L, Lu R. Liquid Biopsy and Tissue Biopsy Comparison with Digital PCR and IHC/FISH for HER2 Amplification Detection in Breast Cancer Patients. J Cancer. 2022 Jan 1;13(3):744-751. doi: 10.7150/jca.66567. eCollection 2022.

    PMID: 35154443BACKGROUND
  • Seale KN, Tkaczuk KHR. Circulating Biomarkers in Breast Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2022 Apr;22(3):e319-e331. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.09.006. Epub 2021 Sep 22.

    PMID: 34756687BACKGROUND
  • Hench IB, Hench J, Tolnay M. Liquid Biopsy in Clinical Management of Breast, Lung, and Colorectal Cancer. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Jan 30;5:9. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00009. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 29441349BACKGROUND
  • Ho TH, Bissell MCS, Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Sprague BL, Lee CI, Tice JA, Tosteson ANA, Miglioretti DL. Cumulative Probability of False-Positive Results After 10 Years of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e222440. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2440.

    PMID: 35333365BACKGROUND
  • Hofvind S, Ponti A, Patnick J, Ascunce N, Njor S, Broeders M, Giordano L, Frigerio A, Tornberg S; EUNICE Project and Euroscreen Working Groups; Van Hal G, Martens P, Majek O, Danes J, von Euler-Chelpin M, Aasmaa A, Anttila A, Becker N, Pentek Z, Budai A, Madai S, Fitzpatrick P, Mooney T, Zappa M, Ventura L, Scharpantgen A, Hofvind S, Seroczynski P, Morais A, Rodrigues V, Bento MJ, Gomes de Carvalho J, Natal C, Prieto M, Sanchez-Contador Escudero C, Zubizarreta Alberti R, Fernandez Llanes SB, Ascunce N, Ederra Sanza M, Sarriugarte Irigoien G, Salas Trejo D, Ibanez Cabanell J, Wiege M, Ohlsson G, Tornberg S, Korzeniewska M, de Wolf C, Fracheboud J, Patnick J, Lancucki L, Ducarroz S, Suonio E. False-positive results in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: a literature review and survey of service screening programmes. J Med Screen. 2012;19 Suppl 1:57-66. doi: 10.1258/jms.2012.012083.

    PMID: 22972811BACKGROUND
  • Durand MA, Friedewald SM, Plecha DM, Copit DS, Barke LD, Rose SL, Hayes MK, Greer LN, Dabbous FM, Conant EF. False-Negative Rates of Breast Cancer Screening with and without Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. Radiology. 2021 Feb;298(2):296-305. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020202858. Epub 2020 Dec 1.

    PMID: 33258744BACKGROUND
  • Alavi N, Khan SH, Saadia A, Naeem T. Challenges in Preanalytical Phase of Laboratory Medicine: Rate of Blood Sample Nonconformity in a Tertiary Care Hospital. EJIFCC. 2020 Mar 20;31(1):21-27. eCollection 2020 Mar.

    PMID: 32256286BACKGROUND
  • Carbone R, Marangi I, Zanardi A, Giorgetti L, Chierici E, Berlanda G, Podesta A, Fiorentini F, Bongiorno G, Piseri P, Pelicci PG, Milani P. Biocompatibility of cluster-assembled nanostructured TiO2 with primary and cancer cells. Biomaterials. 2006 Jun;27(17):3221-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.056. Epub 2006 Feb 28.

    PMID: 16504283BACKGROUND
  • Zanardi A, Bandiera D, Bertolini F, Corsini CA, Gregato G, Milani P, Barborini E, Carbone R. Miniaturized FISH for screening of onco-hematological malignancies. Biotechniques. 2010 Jul;49(1):497-504. doi: 10.2144/000113445.

    PMID: 20615202BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Luca Santoleri, MD

    Ospedale San Raffaele

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Luca Santoleri

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 15, 2023

First Posted

July 12, 2023

Study Start

October 9, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Last Updated

February 12, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

This is a feasibility study without an individual participant data sharing plan

Locations