Feasibility Study Aiming at Pre-Analytical Standardization of Whole Blood Processing for Liquid Biopsy Applications
1 other identifier
observational
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this feasibility study is to evaluate a new sample preparator called See.d. After blood processing the instrument will produce a set of slides and a tube of plasma. These outputs could be used in further analysis in liquid biopsy applications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2023
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 15, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 12, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 9, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2027
February 12, 2026
January 1, 2026
3.7 years
June 15, 2023
February 9, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
SBS slides stability
Evaluation of the area of adhered cell nuclei on SBS slides
1 day (at the blood draw)
Reagents stability
Evaluation of total adhered cell count on SBS slides
1 day (at the blood draw)
cfDNA quality control
Evaluation of the ratio between cfDNA and genomic contaminant DNA
1 day (at the blood draw)
Feasibility of staining on slides produced by See.d
Qualitative assessment of staining positivity
1 day (at the blood draw)
Feasibility of using See.d SBS slides for subsequent analysis
Recovery of mock-Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs)
1 day (at the blood draw)
Feasibility of using See.d plasma for subsequent analysis
Recovery of spiked reference DNA
1 day (at the blood draw)
Study Arms (1)
Healthy donors
Participants who are in good health and willing to provide a blood sample
Eligibility Criteria
Blood samples to be used in this clinical study will be collected from healthy volunteers, already willing to become blood donors and, for this reason, already going to be subjected to a venipuncture and a blood draw to evaluate their eligibility to blood donation
You may qualify if:
- Participants are willing and able to give and sign a written informed consent
- Aged 18 or above
You may not qualify if:
- Ongoing infections requiring antibiotic or antiviral treatment
- Known hemostasis/coagulation disorder
- Known Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tethis S.p.A.lead
Study Sites (1)
Ospedale San Raffaele
Milan, 20132, Italy
Related Publications (10)
Alix-Panabieres C, Pantel K. Liquid Biopsy: From Discovery to Clinical Application. Cancer Discov. 2021 Apr;11(4):858-873. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1311.
PMID: 33811121BACKGROUNDXie S, Wang Y, Gong Z, Li Y, Yang W, Liu G, Li J, Hu X, Wang Y, Tong Y, Yuan P, Si Y, Kang Y, Mao Y, Qi X, Liu Y, Ou J, Li Z, Pan X, Lv Z, Kaji K, Guo L, Lu R. Liquid Biopsy and Tissue Biopsy Comparison with Digital PCR and IHC/FISH for HER2 Amplification Detection in Breast Cancer Patients. J Cancer. 2022 Jan 1;13(3):744-751. doi: 10.7150/jca.66567. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 35154443BACKGROUNDSeale KN, Tkaczuk KHR. Circulating Biomarkers in Breast Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2022 Apr;22(3):e319-e331. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.09.006. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
PMID: 34756687BACKGROUNDHench IB, Hench J, Tolnay M. Liquid Biopsy in Clinical Management of Breast, Lung, and Colorectal Cancer. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Jan 30;5:9. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00009. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29441349BACKGROUNDHo TH, Bissell MCS, Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Sprague BL, Lee CI, Tice JA, Tosteson ANA, Miglioretti DL. Cumulative Probability of False-Positive Results After 10 Years of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e222440. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2440.
PMID: 35333365BACKGROUNDHofvind S, Ponti A, Patnick J, Ascunce N, Njor S, Broeders M, Giordano L, Frigerio A, Tornberg S; EUNICE Project and Euroscreen Working Groups; Van Hal G, Martens P, Majek O, Danes J, von Euler-Chelpin M, Aasmaa A, Anttila A, Becker N, Pentek Z, Budai A, Madai S, Fitzpatrick P, Mooney T, Zappa M, Ventura L, Scharpantgen A, Hofvind S, Seroczynski P, Morais A, Rodrigues V, Bento MJ, Gomes de Carvalho J, Natal C, Prieto M, Sanchez-Contador Escudero C, Zubizarreta Alberti R, Fernandez Llanes SB, Ascunce N, Ederra Sanza M, Sarriugarte Irigoien G, Salas Trejo D, Ibanez Cabanell J, Wiege M, Ohlsson G, Tornberg S, Korzeniewska M, de Wolf C, Fracheboud J, Patnick J, Lancucki L, Ducarroz S, Suonio E. False-positive results in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: a literature review and survey of service screening programmes. J Med Screen. 2012;19 Suppl 1:57-66. doi: 10.1258/jms.2012.012083.
PMID: 22972811BACKGROUNDDurand MA, Friedewald SM, Plecha DM, Copit DS, Barke LD, Rose SL, Hayes MK, Greer LN, Dabbous FM, Conant EF. False-Negative Rates of Breast Cancer Screening with and without Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. Radiology. 2021 Feb;298(2):296-305. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020202858. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
PMID: 33258744BACKGROUNDAlavi N, Khan SH, Saadia A, Naeem T. Challenges in Preanalytical Phase of Laboratory Medicine: Rate of Blood Sample Nonconformity in a Tertiary Care Hospital. EJIFCC. 2020 Mar 20;31(1):21-27. eCollection 2020 Mar.
PMID: 32256286BACKGROUNDCarbone R, Marangi I, Zanardi A, Giorgetti L, Chierici E, Berlanda G, Podesta A, Fiorentini F, Bongiorno G, Piseri P, Pelicci PG, Milani P. Biocompatibility of cluster-assembled nanostructured TiO2 with primary and cancer cells. Biomaterials. 2006 Jun;27(17):3221-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.056. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
PMID: 16504283BACKGROUNDZanardi A, Bandiera D, Bertolini F, Corsini CA, Gregato G, Milani P, Barborini E, Carbone R. Miniaturized FISH for screening of onco-hematological malignancies. Biotechniques. 2010 Jul;49(1):497-504. doi: 10.2144/000113445.
PMID: 20615202BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Luca Santoleri, MD
Ospedale San Raffaele
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 15, 2023
First Posted
July 12, 2023
Study Start
October 9, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2027
Last Updated
February 12, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
This is a feasibility study without an individual participant data sharing plan