Study Stopped
Funding difficulties
Cost Effectiveness of Various Implant Placement Protocols in the Esthetic Zone
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Loss of teeth in the anterior upper jaw significantly affects both well-being and chewing function. Nowadays, dental implants are the treatment of choice for replacing missing teeth with fixed dental prostheses and are often placed in the anterior upper jaw. Depending on various patient-related factors, protocols for the placement of dental implants involve the following time points after tooth extraction:
- 1.On the same day (immediate implantation)
- 2.After 1-4 months (early implantation)
- 3.After more than 4 months (late implantation).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jan 2029
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 4, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 11, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2029
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2032
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2040
September 23, 2025
September 1, 2025
3 years
July 4, 2023
September 17, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Treatment costs
Overall treatment costs for implant placement using three implant placement protocols
From enrollment to the 1 year follow-up
Implant survival rates
Subordinate/Descriptive primary outcome: implant survival rates
From enrollment to the 1 year follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Implant success
From enrollment to the 10 year follow-up
Frequency of application of the various types of implant placement protocols
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Complication rates
From enrollment to the 10 year follow-up
Esthetic outcomes
From enrollment to the 10 year follow-up
Patient-centered outcomes
From enrollment to the 10 year follow-up
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Immediate Implant Placement
EXPERIMENTALImmediate implant placement 1. The extraction of the failing tooth will be carried out. Subsequently, immediate implant placement and bone grafting of the intra-alveolar space by the means of a well-documented xenogeneic bone substitute will be carried out, will be conducted all in one single surgical intervention. 2. After a healing period of at least 8 weeks, implant reopening takes place (conventional loading protocol).
Early Implant Placement
EXPERIMENTALEarly implant placement 1. The extraction of the failing tooth will be carried out. Within a healing period of 4-16 weeks, the extraction socket will be completely covered by soft tissues. 2. Implant placement and bone grafting by the means of guided bone regeneration using locally harvested autogenous bone and a well-documented xenogeneic bone substitute will be carried out. 3. After a healing period of at least 8 weeks, implant reopening takes place (conventional loading protocol).
Late Implant Placement
ACTIVE COMPARATORLate implant placement 1. The extraction of the failing tooth and a socket grafting procedure using a well-documented xenogeneic bone substitute will be carried out. Within a healing period of at least 16 weeks, the extraction socket will be completely covered by soft tissues and complete bone healing is anticipated. 2. Implant placement and bone grafting by the means of guided bone regeneration using locally harvested autogenous bone and a well-documented xenogeneic bone substitute will be carried out. 3. After a healing period of at least 8 weeks, implant reopening takes place (conventional loading protocol).
Interventions
The extraction of the failing tooth will be carried out. Subsequently, immediate implant placement and bone grafting of the intra-alveolar space by the means of a well-documented xenogeneic bone substitute will be carried out, will be conducted all in one single surgical intervention. After a healing period of at least 8 weeks, implant reopening takes place (conventional loading protocol).
The extraction of the failing tooth will be carried out. Within a healing period of 4-16 weeks, the extraction socket will be completely covered by soft tissues. Implant placement and bone grafting by the means of guided bone regeneration using locally harvested autogenous bone and a well-documented xenogeneic bone substitute will be carried out. After a healing period of at least 8 weeks, implant reopening takes place (conventional loading protocol).
The extraction of the failing tooth and a socket grafting procedure using a well-documented xenogeneic bone substitute will be carried out. Within a healing period of at least 16 weeks, the extraction socket will be completely covered by soft tissues and complete bone healing is anticipated. Implant placement and bone grafting by the means of guided bone regeneration using locally harvested autogenous bone and a well-documented xenogeneic bone substitute will be carried out. After a healing period of at least 8 weeks, implant reopening takes place (conventional loading protocol).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 20 years
- Willingness and ability to sign informed consent (Appendix Informed Consent Form) and to participate in the study
- Plaque index according to Silness and Loe of \< 35%
- Presence of a single tooth (FDI positions 15 - 25) that has to be extracted
- Sufficient vertical interocclusal space for the placement of an implant crown (FDI regions 13-23: 3 mm, FDI regions 15, 14, 24, 25: 6 mm)
- Ridge height sufficient for the placement of a ≥ 8 mm-long implant
- Sufficient ridge width for the placement of a 2.9 mm diameter implant (min. 5 mm)
You may not qualify if:
- Any physical or mental disorder that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene or the capability of providing written informed consent and compliance to the protocol
- Any disorder that would interfere with wound healing or represent a contraindication for implant surgery such as, but not limited to, uncontrolled diabetes or conditions resulting in or requiring immunosuppression, radiation, chemotherapy, frequent use of antibiotics or antiresorptive medication such as bisphosphonates
- Pregnancy (pregnancy tests will be applied; see chapter 6.5)
- Heavy smoking habit with ≥ 10 cig/d
- Allergy to titanium
- Severe bruxism or clenching habits, present oro-facial pain
- Insufficient ridge width/height for the study implant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Klinik für Oralchirurgie und Stomatologie, zmk Bern, Universität Bern
Bern, 3010, Switzerland
Related Publications (5)
Tonetti MS, Cortellini P, Graziani F, Cairo F, Lang NP, Abundo R, Conforti GP, Marquardt S, Rasperini G, Silvestri M, Wallkamm B, Wetzel A. Immediate versus delayed implant placement after anterior single tooth extraction: the timing randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2017 Feb;44(2):215-224. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12666. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
PMID: 27978602BACKGROUNDDucommun J, El Kholy K, Rahman L, Schimmel M, Chappuis V, Buser D. Analysis of trends in implant therapy at a surgical specialty clinic: Patient pool, indications, surgical procedures, and rate of early failures-A 15-year retrospective analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Nov;30(11):1097-1106. doi: 10.1111/clr.13523. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
PMID: 31400242BACKGROUNDBuser D, Janner SF, Wittneben JG, Bragger U, Ramseier CA, Salvi GE. 10-year survival and success rates of 511 titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Dec;14(6):839-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00456.x.
PMID: 22897683BACKGROUNDBuser D, Chappuis V, Kuchler U, Bornstein MM, Wittneben JG, Buser R, Cavusoglu Y, Belser UC. Long-term stability of early implant placement with contour augmentation. J Dent Res. 2013 Dec;92(12 Suppl):176S-82S. doi: 10.1177/0022034513504949. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
PMID: 24158332BACKGROUNDBuser D, Chappuis V, Belser UC, Chen S. Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late? Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):84-102. doi: 10.1111/prd.12170.
PMID: 28000278BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Clemens Raabe
Klinik für Oralchirurgie und Stomatologie, Universität Bern
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 4, 2023
First Posted
July 11, 2023
Study Start (Estimated)
January 1, 2029
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2032
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2040
Last Updated
September 23, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
After publication some additional non-published data can be given upon reasonable request.