Hamstring Viscoelasticity and Low Back Pain
Effect of Hamstring-targeted Physiotherapy on Low Back Pain and Muscle Viscoelastic Properties in Elite Adolescent Rowers: A Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent issue among adolescent rowers, particularly males aged 14 to 16 years, with a high lifetime prevalence (94%) and point prevalence (65%). One of the mechanisms of lower back pain in rowing athletes is about the elasticity, stiffness and tone of the hamstring muscle. Current literature shows that stretching exercises, strengthening exercises and kinesiotaping affects hamstring viscoelasticity in various ways. Stretching exercises affect hamstring muscle tone and elasticity, strengthening exercises affect muscle stiffness and kinesiotaping affects muscle tone. While the effects of each of these interventions on viscoelastic properties individually are examined in the literature, studies comparing the effects of changes in viscoelastic properties caused by these interventions on low back pain, athletic disability index and athletic performance in rowers and their superiority among each other are lacking. The goal of this study is to change the viscoelasticity of the hamstring muscles and examine its effect on low back pain, disability index and athletic performance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable low-back-pain
Started Aug 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 11, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2024
CompletedJanuary 30, 2026
January 1, 2026
6 months
July 1, 2023
January 28, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Frequency of Biceps Femoris Muscle
The tones of muscle is described by frequency of muscle or oscillation frequency (Hz). It will be examined by the MyotonPro, Tallinn, Estonia.
change from baseline frequency at 12 weeks
Frequency of Semitendinosus Muscle
The tones of muscle is described by frequency of muscle or oscillation frequency (Hz). It will be examined by the MyotonPro, Tallinn, Estonia.
change from baseline frequency at 12 weeks
Stiffness of Biceps Femoris Muscle
Stiffness of muscle is described by reaction to contraction or forces from outside of tissue that may cause the original form to deteriorate. It will be examined by the MyotonPro, Tallinn, Estonia.
change from baseline frequency at 12 weeks
Stiffness of Semitendinosus Muscle
Stiffness of muscle is described by reaction to contraction or forces from outside of tissue that may cause the original form to deteriorate. It will be examined by the MyotonPro, Tallinn, Estonia.
change from baseline frequency at 12 weeks
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
The NPRS is a segmented numeric version of the visual analog scale (VAS) in which a respondent selects a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of his/her pain. The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g. "no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable").
change from baseline pain at the time of activity at 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Standing Long Jump Test (SLJT)
change from baseline performance level at 12 weeks
2K-rowing test
change from baseline performance time at 12 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Ballistic Stretching Exercise
ACTIVE COMPARATORAthletes will be asked to reach the floor by leaning over in the standing posture without knee flexion. When they feel the tension in hamstring muscle groups, athletes will be requested to make small rebounding motion at degrees between 3°-5° for half a minute.
Extender Exercise
ACTIVE COMPARATORAthletes will lie on his back. Then, athletes will be asked to do 90 degrees of knee and hip flexion at the same time. Finally, the athletes is expected to perform slow repetitive knee extension to the point of maximal possible extension. According to Askling et al. and Aspetar protocol, it will be applied 12 repetitions and 3 sets.
Kinesiotaping
ACTIVE COMPARATORKinesio taping will be applied to the hamstring muscle in the direction of inhibition with a Y-shaped and 25% tension force.
Interventions
It will be applied 4 times per week for 12 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being between ages 14 and 18 and male gender
- Having been rowing at an elite level for at least one year with a professional team
- Having pain 3/10 or higher on NPRS
- Participating to the study in a voluntary basis.
You may not qualify if:
- Having limitation in lower extremity range of motion that limits completion of interventions
- Having a musculoskeletal injury involving the lower extremity in the last 6 months.
- Having undergone a operation in the last 6 months.
- Failing to complete any of interventions.
- Wanting to quit from study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Istanbul Nisantasi Universitylead
- Istanbul University - Cerrahpasacollaborator
- Yeditepe Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
İstanbul Nisantasi University
Istanbul, Maslak, 34398, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (7)
Noormohammadpour P, Hosseini Khezri A, Farahbakhsh F, Mansournia MA, Smuck M, Kordi R. Reliability and Validity of Athletes Disability Index Questionnaire. Clin J Sport Med. 2018 Mar;28(2):159-167. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000414.
PMID: 28107217BACKGROUNDNg L, Caneiro JP, Campbell A, Smith A, Burnett A, O'Sullivan P. Cognitive functional approach to manage low back pain in male adolescent rowers: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Sep;49(17):1125-31. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093984. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
PMID: 25618890BACKGROUNDYu S, Lin L, Liang H, Lin M, Deng W, Zhan X, Fu X, Liu C. Gender difference in effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on flexibility and stiffness of hamstring muscle. Front Physiol. 2022 Jul 22;13:918176. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.918176. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 35941935BACKGROUNDAlmuzaini KS, Fleck SJ. Modification of the standing long jump test enhances ability to predict anaerobic performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Jul;22(4):1265-72. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181739838.
PMID: 18545179BACKGROUNDSeverini G, Holland D, Drumgoole A, Delahunt E, Ditroilo M. Kinematic and electromyographic analysis of the Askling L-Protocol for hamstring training. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018 Dec;28(12):2536-2546. doi: 10.1111/sms.13288. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
PMID: 30171776BACKGROUNDAskling CM, Tengvar M, Tarassova O, Thorstensson A. Acute hamstring injuries in Swedish elite sprinters and jumpers: a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial comparing two rehabilitation protocols. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Apr;48(7):532-9. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093214.
PMID: 24620041BACKGROUNDvan Dyk N, Bahr R, Burnett AF, Whiteley R, Bakken A, Mosler A, Farooq A, Witvrouw E. A comprehensive strength testing protocol offers no clinical value in predicting risk of hamstring injury: a prospective cohort study of 413 professional football players. Br J Sports Med. 2017 Dec;51(23):1695-1702. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097754. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
PMID: 28756392BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Onur Atakan Sekibağ, MSc
Istanbul Nisantasi University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The investigator administering the treatment and the investigator performing the evaluations will be different. The evaluator will not know about the interventions that the participants received.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 1, 2023
First Posted
July 11, 2023
Study Start
August 1, 2023
Primary Completion
February 1, 2024
Study Completion
May 1, 2024
Last Updated
January 30, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share