NCT05938764

Brief Summary

This study combined, adapted and tested motivational interviewing (MI) and the Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA) as a culturally congruent treatment approach for Native Americans. This pilot-feasibility research was conducted in collaboration with a Southwest Tribe. The specific aims of this project were: Aim 1. To develop, in collaboration with the Tribal community, a combination of MI and CRA (MICRA) that is culturally adapted and includes a secondary focus on HIV/STD prevention; Aim 2. To develop and field test culturally-congruent research materials and procedures; Aim 3. To train Tribal behavioral health professionals in delivery of MICRA, and test (N=9) procedures for MICRA certification, supervision, and fidelity assurance; Aim 4. To conduct a pilot study (N=79) to estimate effect sizes for MICRA on key outcome variables with participants; and Aim 5. To estimate the types and prevalence of emotional distress and psychological and health problems likely to be encountered when treating substance use disorders in Native American populations. MICRA Project was conducted in two phases: Phase 1 was a feasibility (N = 9) non-randomized one-group design wherein all participants received culturally adapted MICRA. Phase 2 was a pilot (N = 79) comparing the effectiveness of MICRA and TAU. Following the screening and baseline interview, participants were randomized to receive MICRA or treatment as usual (TAU). Participants randomized to MICRA could receive up to a maximum of 16 to 20 therapy sessions with one of the MICRA counselors over the course of 16 weeks. In TAU, participants received standard outpatient services at the Tribal substance use disorder treatment center. The primary hypotheses were: (1) the feasibility test (N=9) would yield improved percent days abstinent from all substances (excluding tobacco) from baseline to the 8-month follow-up, and (2) In the pilot randomized controlled trial of MICRA versus treatment as usual (TAU), the investigators hypothesized that percent days abstinent from all substances would be greater at the 12-month follow-up timepoint compared to TAU.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
87

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2007

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2007

Completed
6.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 18, 2013

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2014

Completed
5.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 21, 2020

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 10, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

March 12, 2024

Status Verified

March 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

6.3 years

First QC Date

May 21, 2020

Last Update Submit

March 8, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Addiction treatment outcomeAmerican Indian/Alaska NativeIndigenousrandomized controlled trialMotivational InterviewingCommunity Reinforcement ApproachSubstance Use DisorderCultural Adaptation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percent days abstinence from substances

    using the Form-90 for drugs (Form 90-D questionnaire), the investigators will examine percent days abstinent from all substances and conduct statistical tests to determine whether there is a significant difference between the treatment and comparison conditions

    baseline to 12-month follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Condom Use Self Efficacy (questionnaire)

    baseline to 12 month follow-up

  • Native American Spirituality Scale (questionnaire)

    baseline to 12 month follow-up

Study Arms (2)

Motivational Interviewing and Community Reinforcement Approach

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

A psychosocial intervention culturally tailoring the combination of motivational interviewing (approximately 1-3 individual therapy sessions) and the community reinforcement approach (could include maximum range of 15-19 individual therapy sessions). Two tribal members were hired and trained to deliver this intervention and were located separately from the other arm.

Behavioral: MICRA

Treatment as Usual

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Treatment as usual (TAU) included an intake session and could include individual counseling, group counseling, or cultural education. Treatment as usual was provided by staff at the reservation based outpatient treatment center. There was no limit on number of sessions provided.

Behavioral: TAU

Interventions

MICRABEHAVIORAL

see earlier description

Also known as: culturally adapted motivational interviewing and community reinforcement approach
Motivational Interviewing and Community Reinforcement Approach
TAUBEHAVIORAL

see earlier description

Also known as: Treatment As Usual
Treatment as Usual

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years or older,
  • an enrolled tribal member,
  • diagnosed with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV-TR) for substance use disorder (SUD),
  • seeking substance use disorder treatment
  • and able to speak English fluently
  • resident within the reservation or neighboring small settlements

You may not qualify if:

  • any planned absences from reservation greater than 14 days during the 16 week treatment period,
  • cannot identify at least one "locator" person for follow-up tracking,
  • actively psychotic or chronic mental illness that is not well treated, or
  • major cognitive impairment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (6)

  • Greenfield BL, Venner KL. Review of substance use disorder treatment research in Indian country: future directions to strive toward health equity. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2012 Sep;38(5):483-92. doi: 10.3109/00952990.2012.702170.

    PMID: 22931083BACKGROUND
  • Venner KL, Serier K, Sarafin R, Greenfield BL, Hirchak K, Smith JE, Witkiewitz K. Culturally tailored evidence-based substance use disorder treatments are efficacious with an American Indian Southwest tribe: an open-label pilot-feasibility randomized controlled trial. Addiction. 2021 Apr;116(4):949-960. doi: 10.1111/add.15191. Epub 2020 Aug 11.

    PMID: 32667105BACKGROUND
  • Serier KN, Venner KL, Hernandez-Vallant A. The Condom Use Self-Efficacy Scale in Substance Use Disorder Treatment-Seeking American Indian Adults. Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56(13):2066-2073. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2021.1963988. Epub 2021 Sep 30.

    PMID: 34590538BACKGROUND
  • Greenfield BL, Hallgren KA, Venner KL, Hagler KJ, Simmons JD, Sheche JN, Homer E, Lupee D. Cultural adaptation, psychometric properties, and outcomes of the Native American Spirituality Scale. Psychol Serv. 2015 May;12(2):123-133. doi: 10.1037/ser0000019.

  • Venner KL, Greenfield BL, Hagler KJ, Simmons J, Lupee D, Homer E, Yamutewa Y, Smith JE. Pilot Outcome Results of Culturally Adapted Evidence-Based Substance Use Disorder Treatment with a Southwest Tribe. Addict Behav Rep. 2016 Jun 1;3:21-27. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2015.11.002.

  • Serier KN, Venner KL, Sarafin RE. Evaluating the Validity of the DSM-5 Alcohol Use Disorder Diagnostic Criteria in a Sample of Treatment-seeking Native Americans. J Addict Med. 2019 Jan/Feb;13(1):35-40. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000452.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Substance-Related Disorders

Interventions

Therapeutics

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Chemically-Induced DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Kamilla Venner, Ph.D.

    University of New Mexico

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Two phases: Phase one: a feasibility (N = 9) non-randomized, one-group design wherein all participants received culturally adapted Motivational Interviewing and Community Reinforcement Approach (MICRA) Phase two: This study used a mixed efficacy/effectiveness (hybrid) randomized controlled trial of two treatment arms (Treatment as usual-TAU and Motivational Interviewing and Community Reinforcement Approach-MICRA) with a parallel design and follow-up assessments at 4-, 8-, and 12-months post baseline
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2020

First Posted

July 10, 2023

Study Start

August 1, 2007

Primary Completion

November 18, 2013

Study Completion

June 30, 2014

Last Updated

March 12, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

These data are owned by the tribe. If anyone would like to use these data, the PI will serve as the liaison to request permission from the tribe.