NCT05937984

Brief Summary

Painful diabetic neuropathy (pDN) occurs in a subset of diabetic patients, and is characterize by burning, shooting, and electric shock-like pain in the arms and legs. This represents a major health crisis, given the increasing prevalence of pDN and the significant impact it has on quality of life. However, there is limited evidence of effective therapies for pDN pain relief. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive form of brain stimulation that may be a promising therapy for pDN. Previous research has shown that rTMS reduces neuropathic pain in pDN (1, 2, 3). While this is promising, it is important to note that rTMS is effective for \~50% of patients with neuropathic pain. (4, 5). Recent advancements in rTMS technology have created the opportunity for remarkable strides in the effectiveness of this potential therapy. This new development called controlled pulse parameter TMS (cTMS) increases the magnitude and longevity of TMS-induced effects. Although not tested in chronic pain, cTMS possess the power to make transformative changes in pDN, potentially yielding greater and widespread improvements in pain. The overarching goal of the proposed research is to assess the effects of a 5-day cTMS stimulation protocol on measures of pain and neurological function in individuals with pDN.

  1. 1.Kwak S, Choi SG, Chang GS, \& Yang MC (2022). Short-term Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain. Pain Physician, 25(2), E203-E209.
  2. 2.Abdelkader AA, Gohary AME, Mourad HS, \& Salmawy DAE (2019). Repetitive tms in treatment of resistant diabetic neuropathic pain. Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery, 55(1).
  3. 3.Onesti E et al. (2013). H-coil repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for pain relief in patients with diabetic neuropathy. European Journal of Pain (United Kingdom), 17(9).
  4. 4.Attal N et al. (2021). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for neuropathic pain: a randomized multicentre sham-controlled trial. Brain, 144(11).

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 8, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 10, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2023

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

July 10, 2023

Status Verified

June 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

June 8, 2023

Last Update Submit

June 27, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

controlled transcranial magnetic stimulationpainful diabetic neuropathypainneuroplasticity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in PROMIS-29 v2.0 Profile

    Using numerical rating (0 to 5) to assess the change in seven health domains including physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbances, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and pain interference. Each category consists of 4 questions. Also uses a numerical rating to asses pain intensity (0-10).

    Day 1 of intervention, 24 hours post intervention, and 1 week post intervention

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Number of responders to active cTMS

    Day 1 of intervention, 24 hours post intervention, and 1 week post intervention

  • Change in Patient Perceived Global Index of Change (PGIC)

    Day 1 of intervention, 24 hours post intervention, and 1 week post intervention

  • Change in Pain catastrophizing scale-EN-SF

    Day 1 of intervention, 24 hours post intervention, and 1 week post intervention

  • Compliance of treatment sessions

    Day 1 of intervention, 24 hours post intervention, and 1 week post intervention

  • Change in neurophysiological assessment

    Day 1 of intervention, 24 hours post intervention, and 1 week post intervention

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Active cTMS

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Controlled Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (cTMS) will be delivered at 10 Hz, 1500 pulses targeting the hand representation of the left primary motor cortex. cTMS delivery will require \~9 min to complete. This intervention will be performed approximately 5 days per week for 2 weeks. In addition, participants will experience their standard medical care.

Device: Active Controlled Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (cTMS)

Sham cTMS

SHAM COMPARATOR

Sham cTMS will be delivered at as a placebo control. It is important to note that from the participant perspective, the sham stimulation will feel and sound identical to active cTMS. This will be performed approximately 5 days per week for 2 weeks. In addition, participants will experience their standard medical care.

Device: Sham Controlled Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (cTMS)

Interventions

cTMS is a non-invasive, non-painful procedure used to relieve chronic pain and promote short-term changes. The abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle of the left motor cortex will be targeted using neuronavigation software. 1500 pulses will be delivered at 10 Hz stimulation. Stimulation will be delivered at 80% of the resting motor threshold obtained from the right APB muscle. The delivery of cTMS requires 9 minutes in total.

Active cTMS

A sham coil will be utilized for the sham cTMS condition. It is important to note that from the participant perspective, the sham stimulation will feel and sound identical to active. The location and all other parameters of Sham cTMS will be identical to Active cTMS.

Sham cTMS

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • A diagnosis of painful diabetic neuropathy (pDN)

You may not qualify if:

  • a known history of moderate to severe chronic pain other than pDN
  • daily use of opioids prior to the pDN diagnosis
  • contraindications to TMS
  • known psychological diagnosis affecting comprehension and inability to participate in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

McMaster University

Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4L8, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetic NeuropathiesPain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Peripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusEndocrine System DiseasesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Central Study Contacts

Aimee Nelson, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2023

First Posted

July 10, 2023

Study Start

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion

December 1, 2024

Study Completion

December 1, 2024

Last Updated

July 10, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-06

Locations