Peri-capsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block and Quadratus Lumborum Block for Hip Arthroplasty
PENG
Peri-capsular Nerve Group Block and Quadratus Lumborum Block for Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to compare peri-capsular nerve group (PENG) block and quadratus lumborum (QL) block in participants who receive hip arthroplasty. The main question aims to answer is comparing the pain score among participants who receive PENG or QL block. Participants will be randomized and assigned into two groups. Participants will receive a PENG block in the PENG group and receive a QL block in the QL group. After participants receive hip arthroplasty, the investigators will compare the two groups to see if there is a difference of pain score, postoperative opioid consumption, sensation and motor function after nerve blocks, progress of functional recovery in lower limbs, intraoperative and postoperative complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 6, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 7, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 6, 2023
CompletedJuly 6, 2023
July 1, 2023
1.1 years
May 7, 2023
July 2, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Comparing pain scores between the PENG and QL groups immediately after surgery
Pain scores were assessed using a standard Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where a rating of 0 indicated the absence of pain, while a score of 10 denoted the presence of the most severe pain.
10 minutes after surgery
Comparing pain scores between the PENG and QL groups at the 1-hour postoperative mark
Pain scores were assessed using a standard Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where a rating of 0 indicated the absence of pain, while a score of 10 denoted the presence of the most severe pain.
at the 1-hour postoperative mark
Comparing pain scores between the PENG and QL groups at the 12-hour postoperative mark
Pain scores were assessed using a standard Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where a rating of 0 indicated the absence of pain, while a score of 10 denoted the presence of the most severe pain.
at the 12-hour postoperative mark
Comparing pain scores between the PENG and QL groups at the 24-hour postoperative mark
Pain scores were assessed using a standard Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where a rating of 0 indicated the absence of pain, while a score of 10 denoted the presence of the most severe pain.
at the 24-hour postoperative mark
Comparing pain scores between the PENG and QL groups at the 48-hour postoperative mark
Pain scores were assessed using a standard Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where a rating of 0 indicated the absence of pain, while a score of 10 denoted the presence of the most severe pain.
at the 48-hour postoperative mark
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Postoperative opioid consumption
at the 12-, 24-, 48-hours after surgery
The quadriceps strength on surgical side
at the 0-, 1-, 12-, 24-, 48-, and 72-hours after surgery
Time to independently sit at the edge of the bed after surgery
From the date of hip surgery until the patient achieves independent sitting at the edge of the bed, with a maximum follow-up period of 7 days
Time to stand up after surgery
From the date of hip surgery until the patient achieves standing up, with a maximum follow-up period of 7 days
Time to walk with the aid of walking devices after surgery
From the date of hip surgery until the patient achieves walking with the aid of walking devices, with a maximum follow-up period of 7 days
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
PENG group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants with PENG block
QL group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants with QL block
Interventions
Ultrasound-guided PENG block was administered to patients undergoing hip surgery intraoperatively. OR Ultrasound-guided QL block was administered to patients undergoing hip surgery intraoperatively.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who are 20 years of age or older (including 20 years of age).
- Non-emergency hip arthroplasty surgery.
- Able to understand and cooperate with preoperative and postoperative data collection.
- Grade one to three in the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification.
You may not qualify if:
- Under 20 years of age.
- A known allergy to the study medication (ropivacaine).
- Liver cirrhosis classified as Child Pugh Score C.
- Dementia or mental illness.
- Unable to assess their own pain level.
- Patients who have been using opioid drugs for a prolonged period.
- Having a history of drug or alcohol abuse within the last 6 months.
- Having serious illness and at a risk of imminent mortality.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Po-Kai Wang
Hualien City, Hualien, 97002, Taiwan
Related Publications (4)
Min BW, Kim Y, Cho HM, Park KS, Yoon PW, Nho JH, Kim SM, Lee KJ, Moon KH. Perioperative Pain Management in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Korean Hip Society Guidelines. Hip Pelvis. 2016 Mar;28(1):15-23. doi: 10.5371/hp.2016.28.1.15. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
PMID: 27536639BACKGROUNDUeshima H, Otake H, Lin JA. Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block: An Updated Review of Anatomy and Techniques. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2752876. doi: 10.1155/2017/2752876. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
PMID: 28154824BACKGROUNDLa Colla L, Ben-David B, Merman R. Quadratus Lumborum Block as an Alternative to Lumbar Plexus Block for Hip Surgery: A Report of 2 Cases. A A Case Rep. 2017 Jan 1;8(1):4-6. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000406.
PMID: 28036319BACKGROUNDGiron-Arango L, Peng PWH, Chin KJ, Brull R, Perlas A. Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Hip Fracture. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Nov;43(8):859-863. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000847.
PMID: 30063657BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Po-Kai Wang, MD, PhD
Hualien Tzu Chi General Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants will not know which group they are in. Care provider, investigator, and outcomes assessor does not know which block participants will receive. The anesthesiologists who perform the blocks are not care provider, investigator, or outcomes assessor.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, Division of Pain Management, Department of Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 7, 2023
First Posted
July 6, 2023
Study Start
January 6, 2020
Primary Completion
January 31, 2021
Study Completion
January 31, 2021
Last Updated
July 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share