AI-assisted Preoperative Planning Technology for THA for DDH
Short-term Outcome of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Preoperative Three-dimensional Planning of Total Hip Arthroplasty for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Compared With Traditional Surgery
1 other identifier
observational
61
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study, the investigators retrospectively collected DDH case data of THA assisted by AI 3D planning and THA assisted by traditional planning. The compliance between preoperative planning and the type of prosthesis used in the operation, the position of the acetabular prosthesis, the correction of LLD and the postoperative joint function score were analysed to evaluate the short-term effect of AI combined with preoperative 3D planning in THA for DDH.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jan 2020
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 4, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 5, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 3, 2023
CompletedJuly 3, 2023
June 1, 2023
2.6 years
June 5, 2023
June 26, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Type of acetabular cup and femoral stem
Accuracy analysis of planning model and the practical model
31 months
Difference in the length of lower limbs before and after surgery
Prove the accuracy of the artificial intelligence planning group
31 months
Study Arms (2)
observation group
control group
Interventions
In the AI planning group, AI was used to assist in the 3D planning to complete the preoperative design. Preoperative planning was performed by two experienced surgeons and without the chief physician to ensure that the results of the preoperative planning did not affect the selection of intraoperative procedures and prosthesis size.
A traditional X-ray film template was used to complete the preoperative design in the traditional planning group. The position and size of the prosthesis, the level of femoral neck osteotomy, the length of the LLs and the restoration of eccentricity were estimated by X-ray. A plastic template provided by the manufacturer was used to take the line of the lower edge of the teardrop on both sides as the horizontal reference line, and the acetabular template was placed at 40 abduction on the inner edge of the teardrop so that the lower edge of the acetabular cup was adjacent to the teardrop. An appropriate type of acetabular component was selected to fill the acetabulum and maintain coverage, and the femoral component that best matched the femoral medullary cavity was chosen. The height of the osteotomy was determined, and the planning model was recorded after the surgeons were happy with the placement and outcome.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with DDH who underwent unilateral primary THA between January 2020 and July 2022 in the orthopaedic department.
You may qualify if:
- DDH was diagnosed by clinical signs and imaging examination, and a primary THA was planned;
- the patient had persistent unilateral hip pain, which seriously affected their quality of life;
- the standard posterolateral approach was used;
- the contralateral hip was normal or had received THA;
- the proximal femoral Dorr classification was type A or B;
- The acetabular classification was Crowe type Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ or IV;
- all patients were treated with the bioartificial hip joint PINNACLE® cup or SUMMIT® stem, developed by Johnson \& Johnson Biological.
You may not qualify if:
- preoperative and postoperative imaging examinations did not meet the evaluation criteria (non-standard double-hip anteroposterior film, acetabular angle and LL length could not be accurately measured);
- severe osteoporosis, tumour or metabolic disease around the affected hip joint;
- spinal deformity by other causes or a history of lumbar internal fixation;
- external deformity of the affected hip joint in the lower extremity;
- neuromuscular insufficiency (with hip abduction weakness and poliomyelitis);
- severe disease with intolerance to surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University
Yinchuan, Ningxia, 750001, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Deputy Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 5, 2023
First Posted
July 3, 2023
Study Start
January 4, 2020
Primary Completion
July 30, 2022
Study Completion
October 30, 2022
Last Updated
July 3, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06