NCT05927727

Brief Summary

102 patients who have suspicious ALNs were included in our prospective study, which was approved by a tertiary health care facility ethics committee. Each suspicious lymph nodes (LNs) were examined with PDUS and SMI in terms of distribution, appearance and number of vascular structures and the still images were stored. Subsequently, imaging findings were re-evaluated after histopathological or follow-up results and were compared between benign and malign groups. In addition, we revealed the diagnostic perfomance of using the each possible combination of these features in PDUS and SMI. Finally, two radiologists with 22 years and 4 years of experience analyzed the images and interobserver agreement was assessed

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
102

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2021

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2021

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2022

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 28, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 30, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 3, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

July 3, 2023

Status Verified

June 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

November 28, 2022

Last Update Submit

June 25, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

AxillaLymph nodeUltrasoundDopplerMalignancySMIPDUS

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • The number of vascularity in both benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes

    The number of vascularity in axillary lymph nodes are assessed via inspection of the images of Superb Microvascular Imaging and Power Doppler Ultrasound by observers. Countable vascular signals are noted for each lymph nodes

    Up to three months

  • The distribution of vessels in both benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes

    Vascular distributions in axillary lymph nodes are assessed via inspection of the images of Superb Microvascular Imaging and Power Doppler Ultrasound by observers and are categorized as avascular, central, peripheral and mix.

    Up to three months

  • The appearance of vessels in both benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes

    Vascular appearance in axillary lymph nodes are assessed via inspection of the images of Superb Microvascular Imaging and Power Doppler Ultrasound by observers and are categorized as normal/central,eccentric, avascular.

    Up to three months

Study Arms (2)

Malign Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The group includes patients who have malignant axillary lymph nodes which are proven by biopsy

Diagnostic Test: Ultrasound and biyopsy

Benign Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The group includes patients who have benign axillary lymph nodes which are proven either by biopsy or follow-up

Diagnostic Test: Ultrasound and biyopsy

Interventions

Ultrasound and biyopsyDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Each participant has undergone to ultrasound and biopsy procedure if they have suspicious lymph node in axillar region

Benign GroupMalign Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 74 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsFemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years or older
  • Female gender,
  • Sign the informed consent form,
  • No history of axillary lymph node metastasis histopathologically,
  • No history of received chemotherapy or radiotherapy to the axillary region before,
  • No history of axillary lymph node dissection
  • No active infection in the axillary region.

You may not qualify if:

  • Male patients,
  • Under the age of 18,
  • No history of histopathologically confirmed axillary lymph node metastasis,
  • No history of chemotherapy or radiotherapy to the axillary region,
  • Refuse to sign informed consent form
  • Unavailable pathological result

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ankara Education and Research Hospital

Ankara, 06230, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Kurt SA, Eryurekli AE, Kayadibi Y, Samanci C, Velidedeoglu M, Onur I, Arslan S, Taskin F. Diagnostic Performance of Superb Microvascular Imaging in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Axillary Lymph Nodes. Ultrasound Q. 2023 Jun 1;39(2):74-80. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000617.

    PMID: 35943392BACKGROUND
  • Uslu H, Tosun M. The benefit of superb microvascular imaging and shear wave elastography in differentiating metastatic axillary lymphadenopathy from lymphadenitis. Clin Breast Cancer. 2022 Aug;22(6):515-520. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.03.008. Epub 2022 May 6.

    PMID: 35644841BACKGROUND
  • Zhu AQ, Li XL, An LW, Guo LH, Fu HJ, Sun LP, Xu HX. Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma With Negative Axillary Ultrasound Results Using Conventional Ultrasound and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med. 2020 Oct;39(10):2059-2070. doi: 10.1002/jum.15314. Epub 2020 May 5.

    PMID: 32367518BACKGROUND
  • Bian J, Zhang J, Hou X. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound shear wave elastography combined with superb microvascular imaging for breast tumors: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jun 25;100(25):e26262. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026262.

    PMID: 34160389BACKGROUND
  • Kijima Y, Yoshinaka H, Hirata M, Mizoguchi T, Ishigami S, Nakajo A, Arima H, Ueno S, Natsugoe S. Number of Axillary Lymph Node Metastases Determined by Preoperative Ultrasound is Related to Prognosis in Patients with Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2010 Feb 4;2(1):20-31. doi: 10.3390/cancers2010020.

    PMID: 24281030BACKGROUND
  • Yang WT, Chang J, Metreweli C. Patients with breast cancer: differences in color Doppler flow and gray-scale US features of benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes. Radiology. 2000 May;215(2):568-73. doi: 10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ap20568.

    PMID: 10796941BACKGROUND
  • Fu Z, Zhang J, Lu Y, Wang S, Mo X, He Y, Wang C, Chen H. Clinical Applications of Superb Microvascular Imaging in the Superficial Tissues and Organs: A Systematic Review. Acad Radiol. 2021 May;28(5):694-703. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.03.032. Epub 2020 May 5.

    PMID: 32418782BACKGROUND
  • Ryoo I, Suh S, You SH, Seol HY. Usefulness of Microvascular Ultrasonography in Differentiating Metastatic Lymphadenopathy from Tuberculous Lymphadenitis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016 Sep;42(9):2189-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 Jun 25.

    PMID: 27353493BACKGROUND
  • Esen G, Gurses B, Yilmaz MH, Ilvan S, Ulus S, Celik V, Farahmand M, Calay OO. Gray scale and power Doppler US in the preoperative evaluation of axillary metastases in breast cancer patients with no palpable lymph nodes. Eur Radiol. 2005 Jun;15(6):1215-23. doi: 10.1007/s00330-004-2605-9. Epub 2005 Feb 3.

    PMID: 15690206BACKGROUND
  • Ying M, Ahuja A, Brook F. Accuracy of sonographic vascular features in differentiating different causes of cervical lymphadenopathy. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2004 Apr;30(4):441-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2003.12.009.

    PMID: 15121245BACKGROUND
  • Sim JK, Lee JY, Hong HS. Differentiation Between Malignant and Benign Lymph Nodes: Role of Superb Microvascular Imaging in the Evaluation of Cervical Lymph Nodes. J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Nov;38(11):3025-3036. doi: 10.1002/jum.15010. Epub 2019 Apr 3.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

DiseaseNeoplasms

Interventions

Ultrasonography

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosis

Study Officials

  • Pelin Seher Oztekin, Assoc. Prof.

    Ankara Education and Research Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2022

First Posted

July 3, 2023

Study Start

April 1, 2021

Primary Completion

April 1, 2022

Study Completion

May 30, 2023

Last Updated

July 3, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations