NCT05925296

Brief Summary

This study is a double-blinded randomized study examining the effectiveness of the dual-site repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on Freezing of Gait (FOG) in patients with Parkinson's disease. The investigators hypothesize that treatment using magnetic stimulation on double site (including M1-LL and SMA) will improve FOG and gait symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
53

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable parkinson-disease

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2022

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 12, 2023

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 29, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

July 3, 2023

Status Verified

June 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

June 12, 2023

Last Update Submit

June 28, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

freezing of gaitrTMS

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes of Freezing of Gait Questionnaire

    The Freezing of Gait questionnaire will be used to quantify the frequency and severity of this symptom. The score will be compared to the baseline. The minimum and maximum values of the FOG-Q are 0 and 24. A higher FOG-Q score means a worse outcome. The differences in FOG-Q scores before and after treatment can be used to evaluate the effect of TMS treatment.

    Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention, one month post intervention, six months post intervention

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Changes of MDS-UPDRS

    Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention, one month post intervention, six months post intervention

  • Gait speed

    Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention, one month post intervention, six month post intervention

  • Stride length

    Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention, one month post intervention, six month post intervention

  • Stride time variability

    Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention, one month post intervention, six month post intervention

  • Double support

    Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention, one month post intervention, six month post intervention

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

double-site high frequency rTMS over the bilateral M1 of the lower leg and SMA

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in the Experimental group underwent ten sessions of double-site high frequency rTMS over the bilateral M1 of the lower leg and SMA.

Device: magnetic stimulation

single-site high frequency rTMS over the bilateral primary motor cortex of the lower leg

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in the Active Comparator group underwent ten sessions of single-site active magnetic stimulation with high frequency rTMS over the bilateral M1 of the lower leg.

Device: magnetic stimulation

sham magnetic stimulation on motor cortex

SHAM COMPARATOR

Patients in the Sham Comparator group underwent 10 sessions of double sham rTMS on M1.

Device: magnetic stimulation

Interventions

Patients in the Experimental group underwent ten sessions of double-site high frequency rTMS over the bilateral primary motor cortex of the lower leg and supplementary motor area, whereas patients in the Active Comparator group underwent ten sessions of single-site active magnetic stimulation with high frequency rTMS over the bilateral primary motor cortex of the lower leg. In addition, patients in the Sham Comparator group underwent 10 sessions of double sham rTMS on motor cortex.

double-site high frequency rTMS over the bilateral M1 of the lower leg and SMAsham magnetic stimulation on motor cortexsingle-site high frequency rTMS over the bilateral primary motor cortex of the lower leg

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD), as diagnosed by a neurologist.
  • Item 3 of the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire(FOG-Q) scored ≥1.
  • Age between 40 and 80 years old.
  • Mini-Mental State Examination score \>24.
  • Ability to walk 30 meters independently.
  • Stable medication.
  • Patients experienced FOG during an interview.

You may not qualify if:

  • Other neurological or psychiatric disorders.
  • Severe personality disorder. History of epilepsy, seizures, or convulsions.
  • History of head injury or stroke.
  • Metal remains of the skull or inside the brain (outside the oral cavity).
  • Surgeries including metallic implants or known history of metal particles in the eye, pacemakers,hearing devices transplantation, or medical pumps.
  • Severe dyskinesia, tremor, cognitive, visual or auditory impairment.
  • Patients who could not complete the follow-up.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University

Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029, China

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Parkinsonian DisordersBasal Ganglia DiseasesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesMovement DisordersSynucleinopathiesNeurodegenerative Diseases

Study Officials

  • Kezhong Zhang

    The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor/Chief physician

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2023

First Posted

June 29, 2023

Study Start

August 1, 2022

Primary Completion

September 1, 2023

Study Completion

September 1, 2023

Last Updated

July 3, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations