Fractional Co2 Laser Versus Microbotox Injection in the Treatment of Wide Facial Pores: A Split Face Comparative Study
Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser Versus Microbotox Injection in the Treatment of Wide Facial Pores: A Split Face Comparative Study
1 other identifier
interventional
21
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
- 1.Evaluation of fractional Co2 laser as a treatment option for wide pores in skin type (III - VI)
- 2.Evaluation of mesobotox as a new modality for improving wide pores appearance.
- 3.Comparison of both treatment modalities in treatment of enlarged pores.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Feb 2024
Shorter than P25 for phase_1
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 14, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 29, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2024
CompletedDecember 27, 2023
December 1, 2023
4 months
March 14, 2023
December 23, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
pore score
evaluation of facial pores after four weeks of second session by pore score: score "0" referred to absence of visible pores. score "1" referred to patients with visible pores. score "2" referred to patient with enlarged pores. score "3" referred to patient with black heads when embedded on facial pores.
three months
sebum score
evaluation the degree of seborea after four weeks of second session by sebum score: 0 (dry skin) 1. (mild oiliness) 2. (moderate oiliness) 3. (severe oiliness)
three months
Quartile improvement scale
assessment the improvement after four weeks of first session and after four weeks of second session by Quartile improvement scale: 0 = No improvement 1. = Minor/mild improvement (1%-25%) 2. = Moderate improvement (26%-50%) 3. = Marked improvement (51%-75%) 4. = Very significant improvement (76%-100%)
three months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Likert satisfaction scale
three months
Study Arms (2)
Microbotox injection
EXPERIMENTAL21 Egyptian patients with wide facial pores will be treated in a split-face manner. In this side of the face will received single session of microbotox injection contains 20 units of botulinum toxin A.
Fractional carbon dioxide laser in second side of the face
EXPERIMENTAL21 Egyptian patients with wide facial pores will be treated in a split-face manner. In this side will be treated by Two sessions of the fractional CO2 laser on this side of the face at 4-weeks intervals.
Interventions
Will be treated by single session of microbotox injection
Two sessions of the fractional CO2 laser on this side of the face at 4-weeks intervals
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient with wide facial pores any grade.
- Sex: male and female patient.
- Age groups: patient above 18 and below 45 years old.
- Co-operative patient.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient below 18 and above 45 years old.
- Patient with systemic illness or other dermatological disease.
- Patient who receive topical treatment for facial wide pores in past month.
- Patient who receive systemic treatment for facial wide pores in past 2 month.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (9)
Flament F, Francois G, Qiu H, Ye C, Hanaya T, Batisse D, Cointereau-Chardon S, Seixas MD, Dal Belo SE, Bazin R. Facial skin pores: a multiethnic study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2015 Feb 16;8:85-93. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S74401. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 25733918BACKGROUNDLee SJ, Seok J, Jeong SY, Park KY, Li K, Seo SJ. Facial Pores: Definition, Causes, and Treatment Options. Dermatol Surg. 2016 Mar;42(3):277-85. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000657.
PMID: 26918966BACKGROUNDTarek E, Mostafa WZ, Allam RSHM, El-Samanoudy SI, Saadi DG. Short-pulsed and Q-switched ND-YAG laser with topical carbon versus fractional CO2 laser in the treatment of enlarged facial pores: A split-face comparative study. Lasers Surg Med. 2022 Feb;54(2):237-244. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23454. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
PMID: 34255869BACKGROUNDEldeeb F, Wahid RM, Alakad R. Fractional carbon dioxide laser versus carbon-assisted Q-switched Nd: YAG laser in the treatment of dilated facial pores. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021 Dec;20(12):3917-3923. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14311. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
PMID: 34169628BACKGROUNDKwon HH, Choi SC, Lee WY, Jung JY, Park GH. Clinical and Histological Evaluations of Enlarged Facial Skin Pores After Low Energy Level Treatments With Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser in Korean Patients. Dermatol Surg. 2018 Mar;44(3):405-412. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001313.
PMID: 28902036BACKGROUNDAhmed El Attar Y, Nofal A. Microbotox for the treatment of wide facial pores: A promising therapeutic approach. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021 May;20(5):1361-1366. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13675. Epub 2020 Sep 27.
PMID: 32799408BACKGROUNDSalem RM, Salah SAE, Ibrahim SE. Microbotox injection versus its topical application following microneedling in the treatment of wide facial pores: A split face comparative study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023 Apr;22(4):1249-1255. doi: 10.1111/jocd.15590. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
PMID: 36606384BACKGROUNDSayed KS, Hegazy R, Gawdat HI, Abdel Hay RM, Ahmed MM, Mohammed FN, Allam R, Fahim A. The efficacy of intradermal injections of botulinum toxin in the management of enlarged facial pores and seborrhea: a split face-controlled study. J Dermatolog Treat. 2021 Nov;32(7):771-777. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1708241. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
PMID: 31865815BACKGROUNDSaedi N, Petrell K, Arndt K, Dover J. Evaluating facial pores and skin texture after low-energy nonablative fractional 1440-nm laser treatments. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Jan;68(1):113-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.08.041. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
PMID: 23098639BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Dalia A Ahmed, professor
Assiut University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Howida O Mahmoud, lecturer
Assiut University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 14, 2023
First Posted
June 29, 2023
Study Start
February 1, 2024
Primary Completion
June 1, 2024
Study Completion
August 1, 2024
Last Updated
December 27, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share