NCT05923294

Brief Summary

The primary purpose of this study is to compare the root coverage rate of the gingival unit-shaped connective tissue graft, obtained by intraoral de-epithelization, with the traditional de-epithelialized free gingival graft in localized recessions of anterior and premolar teeth. In addition, it is aimed to compare the postoperative gingival thickness between the two techniques. The secondary aim is to search the effects of both techniques on periodontal parameters and to evaluate patient-centered outcomes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
15

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 20, 2023

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 28, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 10, 2023

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2024

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 3, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

August 13, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

June 20, 2023

Last Update Submit

August 12, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Root coverage percentage

    The comparison of the postoperative recession depth to the initial recession depth

    Postoperative 6th month

  • Gingival thickness

    Gingival thickness in the mid-buccal of the recession defect measured with an endodontic spreader and digital recordings

    Preoperative and postoperative 6th month

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Recession width

    Preoperative and postoperative 6th month

  • Probing depth

    Preoperative and postoperative 6th month

  • Clinical attachment loss

    Preoperative and postoperative 6th month

  • Keratinized gingiva width

    Preoperative and postoperative 6th month

  • Vestibular depth

    Preoperative and postoperative 6th month

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

De-epithelialized gingival unit graft

EXPERIMENTAL

In this split-mouth randomized controlled trial, the coin toss method will determine test and control groups. In both groups, connective tissue graft with a trapezoidal flap design will be applied to the recession area. To obtain the connective tissue graft, the gingival unit graft will be de-epithelialized in the test group.

Procedure: Coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft

De-epithelialized free gingival graft

EXPERIMENTAL

In this split-mouth randomized controlled trial, the coin toss method will determine test and control groups. In both groups, connective tissue graft with a trapezoidal flap design will be applied to the recession area. To obtain the connective tissue graft, the traditional free gingival graft will be de-epithelialized in the control group.

Procedure: Coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft

Interventions

In both groups, connective tissue graft with a trapezoidal flap design will be applied to the recession area.

De-epithelialized free gingival graftDe-epithelialized gingival unit graft

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class 1 and 2 patients,healthy patients
  • Nonsmokers
  • Periodontally healthy patients
  • Localized gingival recessions (Miller I, II, and Cairo I recessions with a depth of recession of at least 2 mm) in anterior and premolar teeth

You may not qualify if:

  • Medically compromised patients, especially uncontrolled diabetes
  • Pregnancy, lactation, or suspicion of pregnancy,
  • Poor oral hygiene
  • Recessions associated with caries or restoration

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kutahya Health Sciences University

Kütahya, 43020, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Kassab MM, Cohen RE. The etiology and prevalence of gingival recession. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 Feb;134(2):220-5. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0137.

    PMID: 12636127BACKGROUND
  • Mythri S, Arunkumar SM, Hegde S, Rajesh SK, Munaz M, Ashwin D. Etiology and occurrence of gingival recession - An epidemiological study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2015 Nov-Dec;19(6):671-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.156881.

    PMID: 26941519BACKGROUND
  • Kassab MM, Badawi H, Dentino AR. Treatment of gingival recession. Dent Clin North Am. 2010 Jan;54(1):129-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2009.08.009.

    PMID: 20103476BACKGROUND
  • Cairo F, Pagliaro U, Buti J, Baccini M, Graziani F, Tonelli P, Pagavino G, Tonetti MS. Root coverage procedures improve patient aesthetics. A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Nov;43(11):965-975. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12603. Epub 2016 Sep 16.

    PMID: 27454460BACKGROUND
  • Zucchelli G, Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Stefanini M, Rasperini G, Valles C, Nart J, Wang HL. The influence of tooth location on the outcomes of multiple adjacent gingival recessions treated with coronally advanced flap: A multicenter re-analysis study. J Periodontol. 2019 Nov;90(11):1244-1251. doi: 10.1002/JPER.18-0732. Epub 2019 Jul 1.

    PMID: 31177536BACKGROUND
  • Allen AL. Use of the gingival unit transfer in soft tissue grafting: report of three cases. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004 Apr;24(2):165-75.

    PMID: 15119887BACKGROUND
  • Kuru B, Yildirim S. Treatment of localized gingival recessions using gingival unit grafts: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2013 Jan;84(1):41-50. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.110685. Epub 2012 Mar 5.

    PMID: 22390550BACKGROUND
  • Sriwil M, Fakher MAA, Hasan K, Kasem T, Shwaiki T, Wassouf G. Comparison of Free Gingival Graft and Gingival Unit Graft for Treatment of Gingival Recession: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020 May/Jun;40(3):e103-e110. doi: 10.11607/prd.4180.

    PMID: 32233187BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Gingival RecessionDentin SensitivityPeriodontal Attachment Loss

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gingival DiseasesPeriodontal DiseasesMouth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesPeriodontal AtrophyTooth Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 20, 2023

First Posted

June 28, 2023

Study Start

August 10, 2023

Primary Completion

March 1, 2024

Study Completion

July 3, 2024

Last Updated

August 13, 2024

Record last verified: 2023-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations