NCT05921136

Brief Summary

The present trial is an observational prospective trial. The aim of the present study is to analyse the recycling potential in endoscopy units in hospitals and outpatient facilities. For this purpose, waste is collected for four weeks each at four locations (two inpatient and two outpatient facilities). Questions such as quantity and quality of garbage will be addressed and compared between the different facilities.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
2,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2023

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 12, 2023

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 18, 2023

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 27, 2023

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 30, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 30, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

August 1, 2023

Status Verified

July 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

June 18, 2023

Last Update Submit

July 28, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

endoscopic proceduresendoscopyenvironmental health

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Amount of waste generated per examination in grams (g)

    The amount of waste per procedure will be collected by weighing the garbage of after every procedure.

    16 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Parts of waste per examination in g (residual waste, plastic, paper).

    16 weeks

  • Saving potential defined by the amount of reusable items in g per procedure (e.g. gowns)

    16 weeks

  • Comparison of the amount of waste in g in disposable vs. reusable endoscopes.

    16 weeks

  • Descriptive description of the amount of waste after 4 weeks in kg and per produre in g at the different locations.

    16 weeks

  • Statistical comparison of the amount of waste in the different locations

    16 weeks

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

No patients will be included but only the garbage after the procedures unrelated to patients.

You may qualify if:

  • Endoscopic examination (gastroscopy, colonoscopy, combined gastro and colonoscopy, ERCP, EUS, bronchoscopy)
  • Type of examination (interventional vs diagnostic)
  • Known multi-resistant germs (yes vs no)

You may not qualify if:

  • none

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

MDZ Magendarmzentrum, Gastroenterologisch, internistische Gemeinschaftspraxis

Darmstadt, Hesse, 64287, Germany

NOT YET RECRUITING

Klinikum der J. W. Goethe-Universität

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60590, Germany

NOT YET RECRUITING

IPG Hanau, Praxis für Gastroenterologie

Hanau, Hesse, 63450, Germany

RECRUITING

Klinikum Hanau, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Diabetologie und Infektiologie

Hanau, Hesse, 63450, Germany

COMPLETED

Related Publications (3)

  • Rodriguez de Santiago E, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Pohl H, Agrawal D, Arvanitakis M, Baddeley R, Bak E, Bhandari P, Bretthauer M, Burga P, Donnelly L, Eickhoff A, Hayee B, Kaminski MF, Karlovic K, Lorenzo-Zuniga V, Pellise M, Pioche M, Siau K, Siersema PD, Stableforth W, Tham TC, Triantafyllou K, Tringali A, Veitch A, Voiosu AM, Webster GJ, Vienne A, Beilenhoff U, Bisschops R, Hassan C, Gralnek IM, Messmann H. Reducing the environmental footprint of gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) Position Statement. Endoscopy. 2022 Aug;54(8):797-826. doi: 10.1055/a-1859-3726. Epub 2022 Jul 8.

    PMID: 35803275BACKGROUND
  • Namburar S, von Renteln D, Damianos J, Bradish L, Barrett J, Aguilera-Fish A, Cushman-Roisin B, Pohl H. Estimating the environmental impact of disposable endoscopic equipment and endoscopes. Gut. 2022 Jul;71(7):1326-1331. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324729. Epub 2021 Dec 1.

    PMID: 34853058BACKGROUND
  • Welsch L, Friedrich-Rust M, Tal A, Haider N, Kim S, Schneider M, Schmitt L, Wittersheim L, Schmitt S, Heide A, Heilani M, Zeuzem S, Eickhoff A, Michael FA. Cutting waste in endoscopy: a multicentre observational study in the German healthcare system. Gut. 2025 Nov 10;74(12):1989-1994. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-333401.

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
ECOLOGIC OR COMMUNITY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2023

First Posted

June 27, 2023

Study Start

June 12, 2023

Primary Completion

October 30, 2023

Study Completion

October 30, 2023

Last Updated

August 1, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations