Diaphragm Sparing Effect of Subomohyoid Block With Infraclavicular or Subscapularis Blocks in Comparison With Interscalen Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Shoulder Surgeries
1 other identifier
interventional
87
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The gold standard for shoulder analgesia is the interscalene block (ISB), but it has its own share of disadvantages such as phrenic nerve block, recurrent laryngeal nerve involvement and Horner's syndrome may lead to patient discomfort .Others, such as intrathecal spread and systemic toxicity of local anesthetic, can have serious consequences. Phrenic nerve injury is a common complication with regional anesthesia. Its either temporary with Transient Phrenic Nerve Palsy leading to hemidiaphragmatic paresis after interscalene block or other injections of local anesthetic in the neck . Although studies of ISB have shown a reduction in the incidence in hemidiaphragmatic paralysis with low-volume ISB, the risk of phrenic paralysis is not completely eliminated. To bypass this complication, distal block of the shoulder innervation is recommended such as subomohyoid infraclavicular and subomohyoid subscapularis blocks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 14, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 27, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 20, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 20, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2024
CompletedJanuary 2, 2026
December 1, 2025
5 months
May 14, 2023
December 26, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change is being assessed (Diaphragm excursion)
As shown before diaphragm excursion will be examined preoperative as basal measurement, immediately postoperative in the PACU and 6 hours postoperatively to detect diaghragm excursion.If ratio of post to pre-block is \< 25% this means that phrenic nerve block is included.
basal preoperatively , immediately postoperatively in the pacu and 6 hours postoperatively
Thickness fraction
The percentage change in thickness between end expiration and peak inspiration. It was calculated as follows: (thickness at peak inspiration - thickness at end expiration/thickness at end expiration) Ă—100.
basal preoperatively, immediately postoperatively in the PACU, and 6 hours postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at different intervals within and between the studied groups
immediately postoperative in the PACU , 6 hours postoperatively up to 24 hour postoperatively
Total pethidine consumption in 24 hours of the studied groups
24 hours
postoperative complication of the studied groups
24 hours
Study Arms (3)
interscalen group
PLACEBO COMPARATOR(29) patients will receive an interscalene block before induction of general anaesthesia. Patients will receive 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.25 %+250 mg of magnesium sulphate.
subomohyoid infracavicular group
ACTIVE COMPARATOR(29) patients will receive subomohyoid infraclavicular block before induction of general anesthesia. Patients will receive 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.25 %+250 mg of magnesium sulphate.
subomohyoid subscapularis group
ACTIVE COMPARATOR(29) patients will receive subomohyoid subscapularis block before induction of general anesthesia. Patients will receive 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine + 250 mg of magnesium sulfate.
Interventions
the participant will assess diaphragm sparing in each block and evaluate effectiveness of infraclavicular subomohyoid blocks and subomohyoid subscapularis blocks according to intraoperative and postoperative analgesia and diaphragm affection and comparing them with interscalen and with each others
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient acceptance.
- ASA I and ASA II.
- Age 21-60 years old.
- Both gender.
- BMI \< 35 Kg/m2.
- Accepted mental state of the patient.
- Elective Unilateral upper limb surgeries at the level of the shoulder.
- Time of surgery less than 2 hours
You may not qualify if:
- \- Patient refusal.
- Peripheral neuropathy.
- Pathological coagulopathy.
- Infection at the injection site.
- Untreated pneumothorax.
- Disturbed conscious level.
- An allergy to local anesthetics used in this study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Emad Hamdy Mohamed Morsy
Zagazig, Sharqia Province, 44519, Egypt
Related Publications (8)
Dhir S, Sondekoppam RV, Sharma R, Ganapathy S, Athwal GS. A Comparison of Combined Suprascapular and Axillary Nerve Blocks to Interscalene Nerve Block for Analgesia in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: An Equivalence Study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):564-71. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000436.
PMID: 27380105BACKGROUNDBattaglia PJ, Haun DW, Dooley K, Kettner NW. Sonographic measurement of the normal suprascapular nerve and omohyoid muscle. Man Ther. 2014 Apr;19(2):165-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2013.12.005. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
PMID: 24412231BACKGROUNDMusso D, Flohr-Madsen S, Meknas K, Wilsgaard T, Ytrebo LM, Klaastad O. A novel combination of peripheral nerve blocks for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017 Oct;61(9):1192-1202. doi: 10.1111/aas.12948. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
PMID: 28776638BACKGROUNDBergmann L, Martini S, Kesselmeier M, Armbruster W, Notheisen T, Adamzik M, Eichholz R. Phrenic nerve block caused by interscalene brachial plexus block: breathing effects of different sites of injection. BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Jul 29;16(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0218-x.
PMID: 27473162BACKGROUNDPanero AJ, Hirahara AM. A Guide to Ultrasound of the Shoulder, Part 2: The Diagnostic Evaluation. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016 May-Jun;45(4):233-8.
PMID: 27327915BACKGROUNDBoon AJ, O'Gorman C. Ultrasound in the Assessment of Respiration. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Apr;33(2):112-9. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000240.
PMID: 27035251BACKGROUNDJensen MP, Chen C, Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. J Pain. 2003 Sep;4(7):407-14. doi: 10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00716-8.
PMID: 14622683BACKGROUNDAszmann OC, Dellon AL, Birely BT, McFarland EG. Innervation of the human shoulder joint and its implications for surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Sep;(330):202-7. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199609000-00027.
PMID: 8804294RESULT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assistant lecturer of anethesia and surgical intensive care
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2023
First Posted
June 27, 2023
Study Start
July 20, 2023
Primary Completion
December 20, 2023
Study Completion
December 30, 2024
Last Updated
January 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- after puplication of the study
- Access Criteria
- contact of principal investigator
planned after completion of the study