NeoADT-TULSA
Effect of Neoadjuvant Degarelix on MRI-guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation (TULSA) in Patients With Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Study
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Study Start
July 18, 2023
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
January 31, 2026
Actual (reported)Study Completion
January 31, 2030
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Clinical studies have shown that magnetic resonance imaging-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) of the prostate is safe and effective. In the TULSA procedure, prostate tissue is killed by heating with ultrasound. This clinical trial explores if adding drug therapy with Degarelix before TULSA has the potential to improve further the effectiveness of TULSA in the treatment of localized prostate cancer, especially for patients with more aggressive diseases.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
January 31, 2030
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
May 2, 2023
Actual (reported)June 26, 2023
Actual (reported)July 18, 2023
Actual (reported)January 31, 2026
Actual (reported)January 31, 2030
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Change in prostate volume after neoadjuvant ADT
The prostate volume change will be determined by comparing the prostate volume measured on T2-weighted MRI at four, eight, and 12 weeks of ADT to that at baseline.
Baseline and four, eight, and 12 weeks of ADT.
Change in prostate tumor volume after neoadjuvant ADT
The prostate tumor volume change will be determined by comparing the prostate tumor volume measured on T2-weighted MRI at four, eight, and 12 weeks of ADT to that at baseline.
Baseline and four, eight, and 12 weeks of ADT.
The frequency and severity of adverse events
The frequency and severity of adverse events after neoadjuvant Degarelix and TULSA treatment will be determined by using the CTCAE v6.0 classification. Adverse events attributed to TULSA will also be graded using the Clavien Dindo classification for surgical complications.
After three months of neoadjuvant ADT with Degarelix, the subject will undergo whole-prostate gland MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) (TULSA-PRO, Profound Medical Inc., Toronto, Canada) treatment.
Degarelix is injected subcutaneously into the fatty tissue of the abdomen. A typical protocol consists of a starting dose of 240 mg with a maintenance dose of 80 mg administered every 28 days. In this study, one starting dose and two maintenance doses of Degarelix will be administered between baseline and TULSA treatment in accordance with the terms of Degarelix marketing authorizations.
These entries preserve how the registry describes the intervention. Their treatment roles are shown separately from molecular identities.
Formulated product
FIRMAGON 80 mg powder and solvent for solution for injection
The registry describes a specific formulation. Its exact chemical ingredients and approval status require separate evidence.
SOLUTION FOR INJECTION
View registry recordThe registry names these ingredients. The formulation’s exact chemical form has not been confirmed.
FIRMAGON 80 mg powder and solvent for solution for injection
Named ingredient: Degarelix
View registry recordRegistry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Turku University Hospital
Turku, Southwest Finland, 20521, Finland
Anttinen M, Blanco Sequeiros R, Bostrom PJ, Taimen P. Evolving imaging methods of prostate cancer and the emergence of magnetic resonance imaging guided ablation techniques. Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 17;12:1043688. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1043688. eCollection 2022.
Valerio M, Cerantola Y, Eggener SE, Lepor H, Polascik TJ, Villers A, Emberton M. New and Established Technology in Focal Ablation of the Prostate: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol. 2017 Jan;71(1):17-34. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.044. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
Mikael HJ Anttinen, MD, PhD
Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
First Submitted
May 2, 2023
First Posted
June 26, 2023
Study Start
July 18, 2023
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
January 31, 2026
Phase I Clinical Study of HRS-9815 for PET/CT Imaging in Patients With Prostate Cancer
Every follow-up visit until the first year of follow-up.
Change in prostate tumor-capsule contact length after neoadjuvant ADT
Baseline and four, eight, and 12 weeks of ADT.
Change in prostate vascular perfusion after neoadjuvant ADT
Baseline and four, eight, and 12 weeks of ADT.
Change in prostate tumor vascular perfusion after neoadjuvant ADT
Baseline and four, eight, and 12 weeks of ADT.
Change in periprostatic, prostate and tumor tissue structures after neoadjuvant ADT
Baseline and four, eight, and 12 weeks of ADT.
Thermal coverage after whole-prostate gland TULSA
Immediately after the TULSA procedure.
Change in prostate volume after whole-prostate gland TULSA
Three and twelve months after TULSA procedure
Change in maximum urinary flow rate after neoadjuvant ADT and whole-gland TULSA
Baseline, 12 weeks of ADT, and three, 12, 36 and 60 months after the TULSA procedure
Change in average urinary flow rate after neoadjuvant ADT and whole-gland TULSA
Baseline, 12 weeks of ADT, and three, 12, 36 and 60 months after the TULSA procedure
MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) (TULSA-PRO, Profound Medical Inc., Toronto, Canada) will be used to deliver whole-prostate gland treatment in accordance with the terms of TULSA marketing authorizations. The treating physicians will contour the entire prostate gland for a whole gland ablation.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Klotz L, Pavlovich CP, Chin J, Hatiboglu G, Koch M, Penson D, Raman S, Oto A, Futterer J, Serrallach M, Relle J, Lotan Y, Heidenreich A, Bonekamp D, Haider M, Tirkes T, Arora S, Macura KJ, Costa DN, Persigehl T, Pantuck AJ, Bomers J, Burtnyk M, Staruch R, Eggener S. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2021 Mar;205(3):769-779. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001362. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
EAU Guidelines 2023, presented at the EAU Annual Congress Milan 2023. ISBN 978-94-92671-16-5.
Denham JW, Steigler A, Lamb DS, Joseph D, Turner S, Matthews J, Atkinson C, North J, Christie D, Spry NA, Tai KH, Wynne C, D'Este C. Short-term neoadjuvant androgen deprivation and radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: 10-year data from the TROG 96.01 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011 May;12(5):451-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70063-8.
Hu J, Xu H, Zhu W, Wu F, Wang J, Ding Q, Jiang H. Neo-adjuvant hormone therapy for non-metastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 5,194 patients. World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb 22;13:73. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0503-z.
Nishiyama T. Serum testosterone levels after medical or surgical androgen deprivation: a comprehensive review of the literature. Urol Oncol. 2014 Jan;32(1):38.e17-28. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
Christie DRH, Mitina N, Sharpley CF. A prospective study of the effect of testosterone escape on preradiotherapy prostate-specific antigen kinetics in prostate cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. Curr Urol. 2021 Mar;15(1):63-67. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000008. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
Klotz LH, Goldenberg SL, Jewett MA, Fradet Y, Nam R, Barkin J, Chin J, Chatterjee S; Canadian Uro-Oncology Group. Long-term followup of a randomized trial of 0 versus 3 months of neoadjuvant androgen ablation before radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2003 Sep;170(3):791-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000081404.98273.fd.
Kumar S, Shelley M, Harrison C, Coles B, Wilt TJ, Mason MD. Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant hormone therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;2006(4):CD006019. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006019.pub2.
Sumitomo M, Hayashi M, Watanabe T, Tsugawa M, Noma H, Yamaguchi A, Nagakura K, Hayakawa M, Uchida T. Efficacy of short-term androgen deprivation with high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of prostate cancer in Japan. Urology. 2008 Dec;72(6):1335-40. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.041. Epub 2008 Mar 20.
Aoyagi, Teiichiro, and Isao Kuroda. Enhancement of HIFU Effect by Simultaneous Short Course Degarelix for Early Stage Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Study. Open Journal of Urology 6.03 (2016): 49-54.
Crawford ED, Shore ND, Moul JW, Tombal B, Schroder FH, Miller K, Boccon-Gibod L, Malmberg A, Olesen TK, Persson BE, Klotz L. Long-term tolerability and efficacy of degarelix: 5-year results from a phase III extension trial with a 1-arm crossover from leuprolide to degarelix. Urology. 2014 May;83(5):1122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.01.013. Epub 2014 Mar 22.
Anttinen M, Makela P, Viitala A, Nurminen P, Suomi V, Sainio T, Saunavaara J, Taimen P, Sequeiros RB, Bostrom PJ. Salvage Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation for Localized Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer: 12-Month Functional and Oncological Results. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2020 Nov 25;22:79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2020.10.007. eCollection 2020 Dec.
Anttinen M, Makela P, Nurminen P, Yli-Pietila E, Suomi V, Sainio T, Saunavaara J, Taimen P, Blanco Sequeiros R, Bostrom PJ. Palliative MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation for symptomatic locally advanced prostate cancer. Scand J Urol. 2020 Dec;54(6):481-486. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2020.1814857. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
Dora C, Clarke GM, Frey G, Sella D. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. J Endourol. 2022 Jun;36(6):841-854. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0866. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
Pooli A, Johnson DC, Shirk J, Markovic D, Sadun TY, Sisk AE Jr, Mohammadian Bajgiran A, Afshari Mirak S, Felker ER, Hughes AK, Raman SS, Reiter RE. Predicting Pathological Tumor Size in Prostate Cancer Based on Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Preoperative Findings. J Urol. 2021 Feb;205(2):444-451. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001389. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
Bjoreland U, Nyholm T, Jonsson J, Skorpil M, Blomqvist L, Strandberg S, Riklund K, Beckman L, Thellenberg-Karlsson C. Impact of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy on magnetic resonance imaging features in prostate cancer before radiotherapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021 Feb 24;17:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2021.01.004. eCollection 2021 Jan.
Washino S, Hirai M, Saito K, Kobayashi Y, Arai Y, Miyagawa T. Impact of Androgen Deprivation Therapy on Volume Reduction and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Patients with Prostate Cancer. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2018 Jan;10(1):57-63. doi: 10.1111/luts.12142. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
Hotker AM, Mazaheri Y, Zheng J, Moskowitz CS, Berkowitz J, Lantos JE, Pei X, Zelefsky MJ, Hricak H, Akin O. Prostate Cancer: assessing the effects of androgen-deprivation therapy using quantitative diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur Radiol. 2015 Sep;25(9):2665-72. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3688-1. Epub 2015 Mar 29.
Marra G, Dell'oglio P, Baghdadi M, Cathelineau X, Sanchez-Salas R; EvaluatioN of HIFU Hemiablation and short-term AndrogeN deprivation therapy Combination to Enhance prostate cancer control (ENHANCE) Study. Multimodal treatment in focal therapy for localized prostate cancer using concomitant short-term androgen deprivation therapy: the ENHANCE prospective pilot study. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2019 Oct;71(5):544-548. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03599-9. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
Study Completion
January 31, 2030
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Last Updated
October 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-10
Study fields come from the primary record; confirmed relationships can use other sources. Selecting a record here changes its provenance and downloads, without replacing the displayed study fields.
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: