NCT05917730

Brief Summary

Purpose: Domestic violence (DV) is a mental health problem that affects children and adolescents. Widespread evidence suggests that witnessing DV has physical and mental health consequences. 19% of children and adolescents cared for in Children, and Youth Mental Health Centers in Catalonia declare having witnessed DV between their parents. However, there are low specialized therapeutic tools to intervene effectively. In this line, the research team of the current project adapted and manualized a group treatment designed to treat children and adolescents between 8 and 16 years old witnesses of DV on an outpatient basis called: 'Manual of Emotional Regulation and Interpersonal Abilities group Therapy - MERITA'. The treatment main aim is to improve the emotional regulation and interpersonal skills of children and adolescents who have witnessed DV. We carried out a pilot study of MERITA (Lacasa et al., 2016) where we obtained promising results. Now, we want to carry out this study to improve methodological limitations by increasing the sample size. We have added a waiting list for assigning patients in different arms (MERITA intervention vs. treatment as usual as control group), as well as we improved the assessment (pre, post, and follow-ups) using several scales with good psychometric properties. Aims: The aim of this trial is twofold: firstly, to assess the effectiveness of Emotional Regulation and Interpersonal Abilities group Therapy (MERITA) in children and adolescents who are witnesses of DV and treated at the Infant and dolescent mental health center (TAU); and secondly, to analyze the differences (MERITA vs only TAU) on traumatic, depressive and anxious symptomatology, emotional dysregulation, interpersonal difficulties, externalizing and internalizing symptoms, somatic complaints, prosocial behavior, attachment, and family functioning. Specifically, MERITA will be compared to TAU alone (post and 3-month follow-up). Methods Design: Trail with two arms:

  1. 1.MERITA + TAU (intervention group)
  2. 2.TAU (control group)

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2020

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2020

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 2, 2023

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 26, 2023

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

April 22, 2024

Status Verified

April 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3.5 years

First QC Date

March 2, 2023

Last Update Submit

April 19, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Domestic ViolenceWitnessPsychotherapy, GroupClinical trial

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (25)

  • Post-traumatic symptoms

    Children- Adolescent UCLA PTSD Index for DSM-IV (Pynoos et al., 1987). The scale is divided into four dimensions: reexperimentation, behavioral/ cognitive avoidance, cognitive/ mood alterations, and hyperactivation.

    Baseline

  • Post-traumatic symptoms

    Children- Adolescent UCLA PTSD Index for DSM-IV (Pynoos et al., 1987). The scale is divided into four dimensions: reexperimentation, behavioral/ cognitive avoidance, cognitive/ mood alterations, and hyperactivation.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • Post-traumatic symptoms

    Children- Adolescent UCLA PTSD Index for DSM-IV (Pynoos et al., 1987). The scale is divided into four dimensions: reexperimentation, behavioral/ cognitive avoidance, cognitive/ mood alterations, and hyperactivation.

    3-month follow-up

  • Post-traumatic symptoms

    Children- Adolescent UCLA PTSD Index for DSM-IV (Pynoos et al., 1987). The scale is divided into four dimensions: reexperimentation, behavioral/ cognitive avoidance, cognitive/ mood alterations, and hyperactivation.

    6-month follow-up

  • Post-traumatic symptoms

    Children- Adolescent UCLA PTSD Index for DSM-IV (Pynoos et al., 1987). The scale is divided into four dimensions: reexperimentation, behavioral/ cognitive avoidance, cognitive/ mood alterations, and hyperactivation.

    12-month follow-up

  • Anxiety symptoms

    Self-Assessment Questionnaire Anxiety State / Trait in Children -STAIC- by Charles, D. Spielberger, (1982), adapted into Spanish by Seisdedos (1990). It consists of two dimensions: State Anxiety and Trait Anxiety.

    Baseline

  • Anxiety symptoms

    Self-Assessment Questionnaire Anxiety State / Trait in Children -STAIC- by Charles, D. Spielberger, (1982), adapted into Spanish by Seisdedos (1990). It consists of two dimensions: State Anxiety and Trait Anxiety.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • Anxiety symptoms

    Self-Assessment Questionnaire Anxiety State / Trait in Children -STAIC- by Charles, D. Spielberger, (1982), adapted into Spanish by Seisdedos (1990). It consists of two dimensions: State Anxiety and Trait Anxiety.

    3-month follow-up

  • Anxiety symptoms

    Self-Assessment Questionnaire Anxiety State / Trait in Children -STAIC- by Charles, D. Spielberger, (1982), adapted into Spanish by Seisdedos (1990). It consists of two dimensions: State Anxiety and Trait Anxiety.

    6-month follow-up

  • Anxiety symptoms

    Self-Assessment Questionnaire Anxiety State / Trait in Children -STAIC- by Charles, D. Spielberger, (1982), adapted into Spanish by Seisdedos (1990). It consists of two dimensions: State Anxiety and Trait Anxiety.

    12-month follow-up

  • Depressive symptoms

    Childhood Depression Inventory (CDI) (Kovacs, 2004). It contains two subscales: Dysphoria and Negative Self-Esteem.

    Baseline

  • Depressive symptoms

    Childhood Depression Inventory (CDI) (Kovacs, 2004). It contains two subscales: Dysphoria and Negative Self-Esteem.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • Depressive symptoms

    Childhood Depression Inventory (CDI) (Kovacs, 2004). It contains two subscales: Dysphoria and Negative Self-Esteem.

    3-month follow-up

  • Depressive symptoms

    Childhood Depression Inventory (CDI) (Kovacs, 2004). It contains two subscales: Dysphoria and Negative Self-Esteem.

    6-month follow-up

  • Depressive symptoms

    Childhood Depression Inventory (CDI) (Kovacs, 2004). It contains two subscales: Dysphoria and Negative Self-Esteem.

    12-month follow-up

  • Emotional dysegulation

    Scale of difficulties in emotional regulation (DERS) (Gratz and Roemer, 2004) in Spanish. These items are grouped into six subscales: non-acceptance, goals, impulsivity, strategies, awareness, and clarity.

    Baseline

  • Emotional dysegulation

    Scale of difficulties in emotional regulation (DERS) (Gratz and Roemer, 2004) in Spanish. These items are grouped into six subscales: non-acceptance, goals, impulsivity, strategies, awareness, and clarity.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • Emotional dysegulation

    Scale of difficulties in emotional regulation (DERS) (Gratz and Roemer, 2004) in Spanish. These items are grouped into six subscales: non-acceptance, goals, impulsivity, strategies, awareness, and clarity.

    3-month follow-up

  • Emotional dysegulation

    Scale of difficulties in emotional regulation (DERS) (Gratz and Roemer, 2004) in Spanish. These items are grouped into six subscales: non-acceptance, goals, impulsivity, strategies, awareness, and clarity.

    6-month follow-up

  • Emotional dysegulation

    Scale of difficulties in emotional regulation (DERS) (Gratz and Roemer, 2004) in Spanish. These items are grouped into six subscales: non-acceptance, goals, impulsivity, strategies, awareness, and clarity.

    12-month follow-up

  • Internalizing and externalizing symptoms, prosocial behavior, and interpersonal challenges

    Strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) (Goodman, 1997). It is grouped into five scales: emotional symptoms, behavior problems, hyperactivity/ lack of attention, peer relationship problems, and prosocial behavior.

    Baseline

  • Internalizing and externalizing symptoms, prosocial behavior, and interpersonal challenges

    Strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) (Goodman, 1997). It is grouped into five scales: emotional symptoms, behavior problems, hyperactivity/ lack of attention, peer relationship problems, and prosocial behavior.

    Immediately after the intervention

  • Internalizing and externalizing symptoms, prosocial behavior, and interpersonal challenges

    Strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) (Goodman, 1997). It is grouped into five scales: emotional symptoms, behavior problems, hyperactivity/ lack of attention, peer relationship problems, and prosocial behavior.

    3-month follow-up

  • Internalizing and externalizing symptoms, prosocial behavior, and interpersonal challenges

    Strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) (Goodman, 1997). It is grouped into five scales: emotional symptoms, behavior problems, hyperactivity/ lack of attention, peer relationship problems, and prosocial behavior.

    6-month follow-up

  • Internalizing and externalizing symptoms, prosocial behavior, and interpersonal challenges

    Strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) (Goodman, 1997). It is grouped into five scales: emotional symptoms, behavior problems, hyperactivity/ lack of attention, peer relationship problems, and prosocial behavior.

    12-month follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (15)

  • Somatic complaints

    Baseline

  • Somatic complaints

    Immediately after the intervention

  • Somatic complaints

    3-month follow-up

  • Somatic complaints

    6-month follow-up

  • Somatic complaints

    12-month follow-up

  • +10 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Sociodemographic variables

    Baseline

  • Risk factors

    Baseline

  • Number of attendance at MERITA sessions

    Immediately after the intervention

Study Arms (2)

Experimental: Emotional Regulation and Interpersonal Abilities group Therapy (MERITA).

12 sessions of 75 minutes each and are carried out weekly. MERIT aims to improve emotional regulation, to cope with problems, promoting interpersonal skills and attachment security. Sessions will be lead by two psychologists with accredited experience in MERITA.

Behavioral: Emotional Regulation and Interpersonal Abilities group Therapy (MERITA)

Control: Treatment As Usual

The treatment as usual provided in children and adolescents who witnesses DV is mainly individual psychotherapy.

Interventions

Therapy sessions Block 1. Recognition and verbalization of emotions: Session 1: Presentation, framing, and beginning of identification and denomination of emotions. Session 2: Recognition and differentiation of emotions. Session 3 and 4: Effects of traumatic experiences. Block 2. Learning to manage emotions: Session 5: Managing unpleasant emotions, coping Abilities in body, mind, and behavior. Session 6: New coping skills, self-esteem. Session 7: New coping skills, self-care. Session 8: Skills for clear communication. Session 9: Assertiveness and reciprocity. Session 10: Save card and the good relations game/negotiation skills. Session 11: Social skills and confidence recovery. Session 12: Consolidation and farewell.

Experimental: Emotional Regulation and Interpersonal Abilities group Therapy (MERITA).

Eligibility Criteria

Age8 Years - 16 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patient of a Child and Youth Mental Health Center.

You may qualify if:

  • Patient of a Child and Youth Mental Health Center.

You may not qualify if:

  • Witness to violence at least in the last two years. A witness to violence is defined at least one of these characteristics (Holden, 2003; Suderman 1999): a) ocular witness of the violence; b) hear violent words or acts when she is in a nearby room; c) living the consequences of the violence without him having seen or heard anything, for example, when he finds that his mother is hurt, that she cries, that she tells him what has happened and that she wants to leave the house, or when he lives the police visit.
  • Informed consent of the study signed by the guardian or legal representative.
  • No signing the informed consent.
  • Diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder, active psychotic disorders (schizophrenia, schizophreniform, schizoaffective, brief psychotic disorder, induced psychotic disorder), and severe eating disorder.
  • Reason for consultation of forensic evaluation.
  • Lack of clear collaboration of adults.
  • IQ \< 70.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Centre de Salut Mental Infantojuvenil

Cornellà de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08940, Spain

Location

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
1 Year
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2023

First Posted

June 26, 2023

Study Start

October 1, 2020

Primary Completion

April 1, 2024

Study Completion

June 1, 2024

Last Updated

April 22, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations