Managing Breast Cancer Treatment: Dyad's Perspectives on Treatment Decision, Financial and Family Burden.
1 other identifier
observational
224
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to understand the financial burden and treatment decisions, based on both of patient's and family's perspectives in breast cancer patients who receive systemic chemotherapy, targeted therapy or immuno-therapy and their family caregivers .
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Apr 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 12, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 23, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2025
CompletedJune 23, 2023
March 1, 2023
2 years
March 31, 2023
June 15, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Chinese version of the short form 36 health survey questionnaire (SF-36)
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability.
within the past month
FACT-COST(COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity)
instrument that assesses the degree of financial distress experienced by cancer patient,12-item COST-PROM the terms used to describe feelings about financial condition have been numerous, including perceived economic well being,personal financial wellness, financial satisfaction, perceived income adequacy, financial stress, debt stress, economic strain, and economic distress.Using the Likert five-point scale, the scores represent the following: 0 indicates 'completely absent,' 1 indicates 'very few,' 2 indicates 'few,' 3 indicates 'some,' and 4 indicates 'very many.' Higher scores indicate better economic conditions
Past 7 days
M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory
The first part of the MDASI consists of 13 single-item measures of symptom intensity, including fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain, drowsiness, poor appetite, nausea, vomiting, shortness of breath, numbness, difficulty remembering, dry mouth, distress, and sadness. Each symptom item is rated on a scale of 0 (not al all) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine). The second part of the MDASI assesses the extent to which symptoms interfere with general activities, mood, normal work, relations with other people, walking, and enjoyment of life. Each of the six interference items is rated on a scale of 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). A symptom severity composite score (average of the 13 symptom items) and an interference composite score (average of the six interference items) were computed.
within 24 hours
Cancer Behavior Inventory-Brief
12-item measure of self-efficacy for coping, including:(1) Maintenance of Activity and Independence; (2) Coping with Treatment-Related Side Effects; (3) Accepting Cancer/Maintaining Positive Attitude; (4) Seeking and Understanding Medical Information; (5) Affective Regulation; (6) Seeking Support; and (7) Stress Management for Medical Appointments. Likert-type scale that ranged from 1 (not at all confident) to 9 (totally confident), reflecting the degree of confidence the patient has that he or she can perform that particular coping behavior.
Past 7 days
Decisional Regret Scale
The Decision Regret Scale measures the level of regret that patients have regarding their overall cancer treatment. It consists of five items that assess feelings related to the rightness or wrongness of the decision, the harm caused, and whether they would make the same decision again after surgery. It is scored using a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating a greater level of regret.
Past 7 days
Financial and Work ability Index
The self-administered questionnaire consists of 7 items, including aspects such as physical and mental ability, cognitive function, and health status of the worker. The scores of each item are summed up, resulting in a total score ranging from 7 to 49. A higher score indicates better work ability. The work ability is assessed based on the total score
Past a month
Eligibility Criteria
Patients who have diagnosed breast cancer and their family.
You may qualify if:
- breast cancer
- Patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent breast cancer who require chemotherapy or targeted immunotherapy as recommended by their physicians
- Age 20 to 70
- Within 0.5 to 3 years of newly diagnosed or recurrent breast cancer
- Ability to perform housework or wage employment before cancer
- Those whose cognitive function is sufficient to read newspaper news and answer questionnaires
- breast cancer family
- Patient has been 0.5 to 3 years since the first diagnosis or recurrence of breast cancer and the doctor recommends chemotherapy or targeted immunotherapy
- Patient's self-reported family members who are involved in the patient's physical, social, or medical caregivers with cancer
- Age 20 to 65
- Able to perform housework or wage workers
- Those whose cognitive function is sufficient to read newspaper news and answer questionnaires
You may not qualify if:
- breast cancer
- Patients who were disabled before suffering from cancer
- only undergoing surgery or hormone therapy
- breast cancer family
- Persons with physical, mental and social disabilities
- Family members who are not involved in the patient's physical, social, or medical care for cancer
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yen-Shen Lu
National Taiwan University Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shiuyu C. LEe
National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Science
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 31, 2023
First Posted
June 23, 2023
Study Start
April 12, 2023
Primary Completion
March 31, 2025
Study Completion
March 31, 2025
Last Updated
June 23, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03