NCT05913258

Brief Summary

Objective: To assess and compare the 2940 nm erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser versus a conventional rotary treatment during cavity preparation in children with regard to anxiety level, pain perception, restoration integrity, and bond interface quality. Materials and Methods: In a randomized, blinded trial using a split-mouth design, forty (9-12-year-old) children with 80 carious deciduous molars were included. The cavity in one quadrant was treated conventionally using a bur, while the cavity in the other quadrant was prepared using an Er:YAG laser. Venham's dental anxiety scale and pulse rate measurement using a fingertip pulse oximeter were used to evaluate dental anxiety levels. The Wong-Baker facial pain rating scale and the number of local anesthesia required during both interventions were further applied to investigate pain perception. At the 1-year follow-up, clinical examinations was conducted and the integrity of the restorations was clinically assessed according to the Ryge criteria. Lastly, the restored teeth were extracted and histologically evaluated for bond interface quality using scanning electronic microscopy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2020

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2022

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 25, 2023

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 22, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

June 22, 2023

Status Verified

June 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

May 25, 2023

Last Update Submit

June 17, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Venham's Behavior Rating Scale (VBRS).

    Venham's Behavior Rating Scale is an interval rating scale in which the rating procedure is reliable, valid, and can be easily integrated into clinical or research activities. It is a six-point scale, ranging from 0 to 5 with scale points anchored in objective, specific, and readily observable behavior. Higher scores indicate higher anxiety.

    The treatment procedure (which lasted about 30-45 minutes) was video recorded from start to end. Later, two observers watched the videos to assign each subject a score reflecting his/her behavior throughout the whole procedure time from start to end.

  • Baseline Heart rate.

    Heart rate measurement is a direct measure of physiological arousal since its increase is attributed to stress during dental procedures. A pulse oximeter was used to measure the heart rate. The pulse oximeter was placed on the subject finger at the beginning of the dental visit immediately after he/she sat on the dental chair and remained in place until the treatment was completed.

    The baseline heart rate reading was recorded at the beginning of the dental visit immediately after the subject sat on the dental chair.

  • Mean Heart rate.

    Heart rate measurement is a direct measure of physiological arousal since its increase is attributed to stress during dental procedures. A pulse oximeter was used to measure the heart rate. The pulse oximeter was placed on the subject finger at the beginning of the dental visit immediately after he/she sat on the dental chair and remained in place until the treatment was completed. Heart rate readings were recorded every 5 minutes until the treatment procedure was finished which lasted about 30-45 minutes.

    The mean heart rate was calculated by averaging the heart readings recorded every 5 minutes from the start until the end of the dental procedure.

  • Wong-Baker Pain Scale

    The Wong-Baker scale is a pictorial scale appropriate for children three years and older, that uses pictures of different facial expressions representing different levels of pain from 0-10, face 0 doesn't hurt at all, face 2 hurts just a little bit, face 4 hurts little bit more, face hurts even more, face 8 hurt a whole lot, face 10 hurts as much as you can imagine.

    Immediately after the caries excavation procedure was done, subjects were asked to choose the face on the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale that best depicts the pain they were experiencing during treatment.

  • Local Anesthesia Administration

    During the dental procedure, if the child experienced pain and requested local anesthesia, the procedure was stopped, local anesthesia was injected, and then the procedure resumed. The number of children who requested local anesthesia during any of the interventions, conventional or laser, was documented.

    The injection of local anesthesia anytime during the 30 to 45 minute dental visit.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Restorations' Integrity Evaluation

    follow-up visit one year after the restorations were placed.

Study Arms (2)

Er:YAG Laser Caries Removal group

EXPERIMENTAL

Complete isolation was performed using a rubber dam and saliva ejector. Patients received topical anesthesia before the clamp was placed. Dental caries was excavated using the Er:YAG laser with a wavelength of 2940nm according to the manufacturer's instructions until visual inspection showed that the carious lesions have been thoroughly removed. If the patient experienced pain and requested local anaesthesia, the procedure was stopped, local anaesthesia has been applied, and then the procedure has resumed. Cavities were restored using the Clearfil Universal Bond Quick system in total each mode; 37% phosphoric acid was used, then the Clearfil Universal Bond system was applied, light cured for 90 seconds, after which composite resin was applied (3M Filtek TM Z350 XT Universal Restorative Composite (3M ESPE) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Device: Er:YAG laser system (Doctor smile, Pluser, Italy)

Conventional Caries Removal Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Complete isolation was performed using a rubber dam and saliva ejector. Patients received topical anesthesia before the clamp was placed. Dental caries was excavated using the Mastertorque high/low-speed air rotor handpiece until visual inspection showed that the carious lesions have been thoroughly removed. If the patient experienced pain and requested LA, the procedure was stopped, LA was applied, and then the procedure resumed. According to the manufacturer's instructions, cavities were restored using the Clearfil Universal Bond Quick system and composite resin (3M Filtek TM Z350 XT Universal Restorative Composite (3M ESPE).

Device: Master Torque high/low-speed air rotor handpiece (KaVo Dental, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA)

Interventions

The Er:YAG laser offers a virtually painless alternative to conventional methods of caries removal, and its adoption in clinical practice could greatly reduce children's fear of going to the dentist. Caries removal is one of the leading reasons for dentist visits among children, and many children become fearful at the mere thought of a drill touching their teeth, before they even hear the sound. Laser caries removal could go a long way toward eliminating children's fear of going to the dentist; it is virtually painless, and most children are able to get through the entire procedure without needing local anesthesia.

Er:YAG Laser Caries Removal group

Mechanical removal of carious lesions with a rotating handpiece and bur instruments is the most often used approach for treating dental caries because it is cost-effective, timesaving, and simple. However, these procedures have many drawbacks, including the potential for removing healthy tooth structures, vibration and noise, which can cause the patient anxiety and pain, thus necessitating local anesthesia.

Conventional Caries Removal Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age9 Years - 12 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy patients between 9 and 12 years of age.
  • Simple occlusal caries that is limited to enamel and dentine without proximal caries, or pulp involvement in at least two primary molars (pairs).
  • Primary molars with 1/3rd of their root remained.
  • Primary teeth have permanent successor teeth with 1/2 of the root formed.

You may not qualify if:

  • Caries lesion that had reached or was approaching the pulp.
  • Previous fillings.
  • Periapical lesions, or dental abscess.
  • No permanent successor teeth.
  • Behavioral or medical problem.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

King Abdulaziz University

Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DemineralizationTooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The examiner who clinically evaluated the restorations using Ryge criteria did not know which tooth had received which treatment.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: A randomized, blinded split-mouth study. The children were randomly assigned into one of two groups randomly. The first group included were assigned to receive the conventional treatment at the first visit and the laser treatment at the second visit. The second group was assigned to receive the laser treatment at the first visit and the conventional treatment at the second visit.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor in Pediatric Dentistry

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2023

First Posted

June 22, 2023

Study Start

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion

March 1, 2022

Study Completion

March 1, 2022

Last Updated

June 22, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-06

Locations