Gathering Evidence on Best Practices for Lay Rescuer CPR Training
Generating Evidence to Optimize Lay Rescuer Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Training: a Longitudinal Study of Frequency, Modality, and Design Features Impacting Skill Retention
1 other identifier
interventional
2,100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this prospective trial is to compare CPR skill and attitudes in lay rescuers. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:
- What is the optimal training timing, duration, and frequency for lay rescuers that leads to CPR skill retention?
- What is the impact of CPR manikin type (high-fidelity, inflatable, nontraditional objects) on skill retention?
- How do specific features of training modality -- such as contextualization, gamification, and emotional engagement -- impact skill proficiency, knowledge retention, and attitudes about CPR? Participants will
- Answer pre-training questionnaires
- Participate in CPR training
- Participate in CPR skills testing
- Answer post-training questionnaires Researchers will compare different methods of training, different frequencies of training, and different manikin types.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2026
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 13, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 18, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2030
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2031
June 4, 2025
May 1, 2025
4 years
January 13, 2023
May 29, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
CPR Skill Retention
High-quality CPR as measured by compression rate (per minute), depth (inches), and correct hand placement. High-quality CPR is defined as correct rate (100-120/min) AND \>70% of compressions at appropriate depth (2-2.4inches) with appropriate hand placement.
1-4 years
Secondary Outcomes (4)
CPR Attitudes
1-4 years
CPR Knowledge Retention
1-4 years
Emotional Profile
1-4 years
Learner Engagement
1-4 years
Other Outcomes (1)
Training Feature Effects (Contextualization, Gamification, Emotional Impact)
1-4 years
Study Arms (9)
Every 2 year standard CPR training
ACTIVE COMPARATORReceives two 60-minute instructor-led CPR trainings: once in 9th grade and again in 11th grade
Annual Standard CPR training
ACTIVE COMPARATORReceives a 60-minute instructor-led CPR training each year for three years.
High-Frequency, Blended Training
ACTIVE COMPARATORStarts with a 30-minute serious game-based session, followed by 10-minute refreshers every semester for four years (8 total sessions).
Annual Serious Game Training
ACTIVE COMPARATORReceives a 30-minute serious game-based training session once per year for three years.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONNo CPR training
Standard High-fidelity Manikin
ACTIVE COMPARATORUses a commercially available torso manikin with realistic chest mechanics and feedback. Serves as the gold standard comparator for CPR training.
Low-Fidelity Manikin
ACTIVE COMPARATORUses a basic inflatable torso manikin with minimal feedback or resistance. Represents a low-cost, commonly used alternative in schools and communities.
No-Head Manikin (Prototype)
ACTIVE COMPARATORUses a custom-built spring-based device with a silicone topper and realistic force-displacement properties that closely mimic the human chest. Tests whether an affordable, biomechanically accurate prototype can improve compression quality.
Non-Traditional Object
ACTIVE COMPARATORUses improvised materials (e.g., toilet paper rolls) to simulate chest compressions. Evaluates the feasibility and effectiveness of ultra-low-cost CPR practice tools
Interventions
Various durations and frequencies of CPR training
Various types of CPR manikins are compared
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All students at participating schools
You may not qualify if:
- Previous CPR training (will be included in the CPR training but excluded from analysis)
- Physical injury which prevents performing CPR
- Student or parent opt-out
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Nevada Reno
Reno, Nevada, 89557, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lorrel Toft
University of Nevada, Reno
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The statistical analysis will be masked as to which intervention subjects received, with simple "A," "B," etc. designation.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 13, 2023
First Posted
June 18, 2023
Study Start
April 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 31, 2030
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 31, 2031
Last Updated
June 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
All data is gathered and reported in de-identified, aggregate form, per IRB and school official direction.