Scalpel Versus Diathermy for Transverse Abdominal Incision in First Elective Caesarean Section
1 other identifier
interventional
84
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study will be to compare two methods of skin incisions during the first caesarean section (CS), that is scalpel and diathermy, assessing differences in blood loss during incision, incisional time, total surgery time, post-operative pain, wound healing, complications, and cosmetic outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 7, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2024
CompletedJuly 10, 2023
July 1, 2023
11 months
June 7, 2023
July 7, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incision blood loss
This will be calculated by weighing the gauze pre and postoperatively (1mg = 1ml) after complete hemostasis will be achieved.
During surgery
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Incision time
During surgery
Total surgery time
During surgery
Post-operative pain assessed by VAS
During the first three days after surgery
Wound complications
During the first month after surgery
Cosmetic wound evaluation assessed by POSAS
One month after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Group_A: skin incision with scalpel.
PLACEBO COMPARATORIn the scalpel group, the skin incision will be made using the traditional method, with a scalpel (No. 22).
Group_B: skin incision with diathermy.
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn the diathermy group, the incision will be made using a small flat blade pen electrode without applying pressure. The electrode will be set to cutting mode, delivering a sinusoidal current of maximum 120 watts.
Interventions
A Pfannenstiel skin incision will be performed using a scalpel, extending through the subcutaneous tissue and rectus sheath. After separation of rectus muscles, peritoneum will be visualized and opened. Optimal hemostasis will be achieved by applying pressure to skin blood vessels and ligating any subcutaneous bleeding. Group A: skin incision with a scalpel.
A Pfannenstiel skin incision will be made using a scalpel. Subsequently, a diathermy pen electrode will be employed for the dissection of deeper tissues. Optimal hemostasis will be achieved by using the same blade pen electrode, set to coagulation mode. Group B: skin incision with diathermy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women without a history of previous cesarean section or other abdominal surgery
- Age greater then 18 years (only adult patients)
- Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18.5 and 29.9 kg/m2
- Gestational age greater then 37 weeks (at term pregnancies)
- No contraindications to spinal anesthesia
- Indication to elective CS: extra-obstetrical reasons, failure of medical induction of labor, breech fetal presentation
- Informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Women refusing to participate in the study
- Women undergoing urgency or emergency cesarean deliveries
- Women with a history of previous cesarean section or abdominal surgery
- Women with multifetal pregnancies
- Necessity of general anesthesia
- Use of anticoagulants
- Patients needing a median longitudinal abdominal section
- Patients with pacemakers
- Allergy to cephalosporins
- Any medical disorder that can affect wound healing as diabetes, hypertension, hepatic or renal diseases, chronic anemia, chronic skin conditions, congenital or acquired bleeding diathesis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Consorziale Policlinico"
Bari, 70124, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amerigo Vitagliano, MD, PhD
"Aldo Moro" University of Bari
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD, Assistant Professor (Researcher type-B)
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 7, 2023
First Posted
June 15, 2023
Study Start
July 1, 2023
Primary Completion
June 1, 2024
Study Completion
December 1, 2024
Last Updated
July 10, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07