Umbilical Cord Abnormalities in the Prediction of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes
ULOOP
1 other identifier
observational
5,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of our study is to investigate the association of umbilical cord abnormalities with adverse pregnancy outcomes. The umbilical cord parameters that will be investigated as part of this study include the umbilical cord coiling index (UCI), umbilical cord (UC) diameter, umbilical vein (UV) diameter, UV flow velocity and the presence of nuchal cord. The UCI, UC, UV diameter \& flow and presence of nuchal cord will be measured in routine unselected populations at 20-22 weeks and 35-37 weeks gestation during the study period. We will also measure the UC and UV diameter in a nested population of high-risk pregnancies attending our placental disorders clinic which have been deemed to be at risk of having adverse pregnancy outcomes. Primary objective: To investigate if prenatal assessment of UCI, UC, UV diameter \& flow and presence of nuchal cord measured routinely in unselected screened populations at 20-22 weeks and 35-37 weeks' can provide an independent prediction of pregnancies that develop adverse pregnancy outcomes. Secondary objectives: To assess the correlation of UC and UV diameter measured by ultrasound scan and fetal magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of pregnancy outcome. To examine the association of these umbilical cord measurements and observations in a nested cohort of pregnancies in the high-risk placental disorders clinic.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2023
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 5, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 13, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 3, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 3, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedMarch 12, 2024
March 1, 2024
1.8 years
June 5, 2023
March 11, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Delivery of small for gestational age (SGA) neonate
Birth weight below the 5th and 10th percentile
2 years
Emergency CS for fetal distress
Caesarean section carried out for fetal heart rate abnormalities in labour
2 years
Hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy
Brain damage in neonates causes due to lack of oxygen and confirmed on ultrasound scan
2 years
Stillbirth
Death of a fetuses between 24 weeks and before the birth of the baby
2 years
Composite hypoxic morbidity
A composite outcome measures of any of the above outcome measures
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Preterm delivery < 37 weeks
2 years
Development of preeclampsia
2 years
Admission to neonatal intensive care unit
2 years
Study Arms (2)
Unselected population
Routine unselected populations at 20-22 weeks and 35-37 weeks
High risk population
High-risk pregnancies attending the placental disorders clinic which have been deemed to be at risk of having adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Interventions
In the screening study of an unselected population at 20-22 weeks' and 35-37 weeks' gestation, women are offered an ultrasound scan as part of standard care and will be invited to take part in the study which will involve taking the following additional ultrasound measurements: 1. Umbilical cord coiling index (UCI) 2. Transverse diameter of umbilical cord (UC) 3. Transverse diameter of umbilical vein (UV) and artery (UA) 4. Umbilical vein (UV) Doppler flow characteristics 5. Presence of nuchal cord
Eligibility Criteria
The study will be carried out in two cohorts: the first is the cohort of unselected population of pregnancies attending for their routine pregnancy care and ultrasound appointments at 20-22 weeks and 35-37 weeks. A nested cohort study will also be carried out in a high-risk cohort of pregnancies referred to the placental disorders clinic for women who have risk factors for delivering a small for gestational age baby or those at risk of developing preeclampsia.
You may qualify if:
- Singleton pregnancies.
- Women booked at our unit prior to 20 weeks' gestation.
You may not qualify if:
- Multiple pregnancies.
- Age \< 16 years.
- Those unable to provide consent.
- Pregnancies with fetal abnormalities.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Medway NHS Foundation Trust
Gillingham, Kent, ME7 5NY, United Kingdom
Related Publications (25)
Hegazy AA. Anatomy and embryology of umbilicus in newborns: a review and clinical correlations. Front Med. 2016 Sep;10(3):271-7. doi: 10.1007/s11684-016-0457-8. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
PMID: 27473223BACKGROUNDMoshiri M, Zaidi SF, Robinson TJ, Bhargava P, Siebert JR, Dubinsky TJ, Katz DS. Comprehensive imaging review of abnormalities of the umbilical cord. Radiographics. 2014 Jan-Feb;34(1):179-96. doi: 10.1148/rg.341125127.
PMID: 24428290BACKGROUNDMitchell KE, Weiss ML, Mitchell BM, Martin P, Davis D, Morales L, Helwig B, Beerenstrauch M, Abou-Easa K, Hildreth T, Troyer D, Medicetty S. Matrix cells from Wharton's jelly form neurons and glia. Stem Cells. 2003;21(1):50-60. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.21-1-50.
PMID: 12529551BACKGROUNDPacora P, Romero R, Jaiman S, Erez O, Bhatti G, Panaitescu B, Benshalom-Tirosh N, Jung EJ, Hsu CD, Hassan SS, Yeo L, Kadar N. Mechanisms of death in structurally normal stillbirths. J Perinat Med. 2019 Feb 25;47(2):222-240. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2018-0216.
PMID: 30231013BACKGROUNDMan J, Hutchinson JC, Heazell AE, Ashworth M, Jeffrey I, Sebire NJ. Stillbirth and intrauterine fetal death: role of routine histopathological placental findings to determine cause of death. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;48(5):579-584. doi: 10.1002/uog.16019. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
PMID: 27781319BACKGROUNDAshoor G, Syngelaki A, Papastefanou I, Nicolaides KH, Akolekar R. Development and validation of model for prediction of placental dysfunction-related stillbirth from maternal factors, fetal weight and uterine artery Doppler at mid-gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jan;59(1):61-68. doi: 10.1002/uog.24795.
PMID: 34643306BACKGROUNDHammad IA, Blue NR, Allshouse AA, Silver RM, Gibbins KJ, Page JM, Goldenberg RL, Reddy UM, Saade GR, Dudley DJ, Thorsten VR, Conway DL, Pinar H, Pysher TJ; NICHD Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network Group. Umbilical Cord Abnormalities and Stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;135(3):644-652. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003676.
PMID: 32028503BACKGROUNDAkolekar R, Tokunaka M, Ortega N, Syngelaki A, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of stillbirth from maternal factors, fetal biometry and uterine artery Doppler at 19-24 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;48(5):624-630. doi: 10.1002/uog.17295.
PMID: 27854387BACKGROUNDTantbirojn P, Saleemuddin A, Sirois K, Crum CP, Boyd TK, Tworoger S, Parast MM. Gross abnormalities of the umbilical cord: related placental histology and clinical significance. Placenta. 2009 Dec;30(12):1083-8. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2009.09.005. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
PMID: 19853300BACKGROUNDJessop FA, Lees CC, Pathak S, Hook CE, Sebire NJ. Umbilical cord coiling: clinical outcomes in an unselected population and systematic review. Virchows Arch. 2014 Jan;464(1):105-12. doi: 10.1007/s00428-013-1513-2. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
PMID: 24259031BACKGROUNDDamasceno EB, de Lima PP. Wharton's jelly absence: a possible cause of stillbirth. Autops Case Rep. 2013 Dec 31;3(4):43-47. doi: 10.4322/acr.2013.038. eCollection 2013 Oct-Dec.
PMID: 28584806BACKGROUNDde Laat MW, Franx A, van Alderen ED, Nikkels PG, Visser GH. The umbilical coiling index, a review of the literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005 Feb;17(2):93-100. doi: 10.1080/14767050400028899.
PMID: 16076615BACKGROUNDde Laat MW, van Alderen ED, Franx A, Visser GH, Bots ML, Nikkels PG. The umbilical coiling index in complicated pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Jan;130(1):66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.01.018. Epub 2006 Mar 2.
PMID: 16513244BACKGROUNDStrong TH Jr, Jarles DL, Vega JS, Feldman DB. The umbilical coiling index. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Jan;170(1 Pt 1):29-32.
PMID: 8296839BACKGROUNDDe Laat MW, Franx A, Nikkels PG, Visser GH. Prenatal ultrasonographic prediction of the umbilical coiling index at birth and adverse pregnancy outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Oct;28(5):704-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.2786.
PMID: 16952204BACKGROUNDEl Behery MM, Nouh AA, Alanwar AM, Diab AE. Effect of umbilical vein blood flow on perinatal outcome of fetuses with lean and/or hypo-coiled umbilical cord. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Jan;283(1):53-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-1272-0. Epub 2009 Nov 7.
PMID: 19898858BACKGROUNDDegani S, Leibovich Z, Shapiro I, Gonen R, Ohel G. Early second-trimester low umbilical coiling index predicts small-for-gestational-age fetuses. J Ultrasound Med. 2001 Nov;20(11):1183-8. doi: 10.7863/jum.2001.20.11.1183.
PMID: 11758023BACKGROUNDJo YS, Jang DK, Lee G. The sonographic umbilical cord coiling in late second trimester of gestation and perinatal outcomes. Int J Med Sci. 2011;8(7):594-8. doi: 10.7150/ijms.8.594. Epub 2011 Oct 7.
PMID: 22022212BACKGROUNDSharma B, Bhardwaj N, Gupta S, Gupta PK, Verma A, Malviya K. Association of umbilical coiling index by colour Doppler ultrasonography at 18-22 weeks of gestation and perinatal outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012 Dec;62(6):650-4. doi: 10.1007/s13224-012-0230-0. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
PMID: 24293842BACKGROUNDMittal A, Nanda S, Sen J. Antenatal umbilical coiling index as a predictor of perinatal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Apr;291(4):763-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3456-5. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
PMID: 25209352BACKGROUNDKosus A, Kosus N, Turhan NO. Is there any relation between umbilical artery and vein diameter and estimated fetal weight in healthy pregnant women? J Med Ultrason (2001). 2012 Oct;39(4):227-34. doi: 10.1007/s10396-012-0360-0. Epub 2012 May 9.
PMID: 27279109BACKGROUNDTutus S, Asal N, Uysal G, Sahin H. Is there a relationship between high birth weight and umbilical vein diameter? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Nov;34(21):3609-3613. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1814247. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
PMID: 33081536BACKGROUNDDi Naro E, Raio L, Ghezzi F, Franchi M, Romano F, Addario VD. Longitudinal umbilical vein blood flow changes in normal and growth-retarded fetuses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002 Jun;81(6):527-33.
PMID: 12047306BACKGROUNDClapp JF 3rd, Stepanchak W, Hashimoto K, Ehrenberg H, Lopez B. The natural history of antenatal nuchal cords. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;189(2):488-93. doi: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00371-5.
PMID: 14520223BACKGROUNDHayes DJL, Warland J, Parast MM, Bendon RW, Hasegawa J, Banks J, Clapham L, Heazell AEP. Umbilical cord characteristics and their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2020 Sep 24;15(9):e0239630. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239630. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32970750BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ranjit Akolekar, MD MRCOG PhD
Medway NHS Foundation Trust
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant in Fetal Medicine & Obstetrics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 5, 2023
First Posted
June 13, 2023
Study Start
October 3, 2023
Primary Completion
July 3, 2025
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
March 12, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03