[68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junctional Cancer
[68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT: The Dagnostic Accuracy for Primary Staging and Re-staging After Chemotherapy in Patients With Gastric and Gastro-esophageal Junctional Cancer
2 other identifiers
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Twenty (n=20) patients with gastric cancer or gastro-esophageal junctional cancer will undergo FAPI PET/CTs in addition to routing diagnostic workup (including FDG PET/CT) at primary staging and restaging. The FAPI PET/CT results will be compared to conventional imaging (including FDG PET/CT) using histopathology as reference standard, and the diagnostic accuracy will be determined. FAP-immunohistochemistry will be conducted in surgical specimens. FAPI PET/CT's impact on patient management and the prognostic value of FAPI PET/CT will be evaluated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2 gastric-cancer
Started Feb 2024
Shorter than P25 for phase_2 gastric-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 2, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 12, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 15, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 18, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 18, 2025
CompletedDecember 30, 2025
December 1, 2025
1.8 years
June 2, 2023
December 23, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Diagnostic accuracy
Compare the FAPI PET/CT and FDG PET/CT findings in primary tumor, regional lymph nodes and distant metastases to a histopathological reference standard where the sensitivity, specificity, positive predicative value, and negative predicative values of the PET/CTs are determined, both at primary staging and at restaging
1.5 years
Staging
Compare the cancer stage (according to AJCC 8th edition TNM-classification) as determined by FAPI PET/CT compared to conventional imaging (including FDG PET/CT) at primary staging and at restaging (after neoadjuvant chemotherapy). The proportion of patients downstaged, unchanged stage, and upstaged, due to the added FAPI PET/CT are determined.
1.5 years
Patient management
Investigate what proportion of patients will be (hypothetically) treated differently due to an added FAPI PET/CT at primary staging and at restaging (after neoadjuvant chemotherapy) by the treating clinicians
1.5 - 2 years
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Uptake values
1.5 years
Chemotherapy effect on uptake values
1.5 - 2 years
Unexpected FAPI PET/CT findings
1 -2 years
Interobserver readability
4 years
Prognostic value
10 years
Study Arms (1)
Gastric or gastro-esophageal junctioncancer
EXPERIMENTALPatients with biopsy verified gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer undergo FAPI PET/CT in addition to conventional imaging
Interventions
Gastric or gatro-esophageal junction cancer patients undergo 68Ga-FAPi-46 PET/CT at primary staging and at restaging
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Newly diagnosed with biopsy verified gastric or GEJ cancer and referred to primary staging FDG PET/CT
- Deemed resectable and operable at the MDT, with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- Considered physically and mentally able to participate in the research project
- Can read and understand Danish
- years or older and able to consent to project participation
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with non-resectable, inoperable, or recurrent gastric or GEJ cancer
- Patients with an imminent need for surgery or in an emergency
- Known concurrent other malignancy within the previous 5 years other than non-melanoma skin cancer
- Patients not suited for surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery
- Subject weighing more than 180 kg (weight limit scanner) or unable to fit within the imaging gantry
- History of allergic reactions / hypersensitivity attributed to 18F-FDG or 68Ga-FAPI-46.
- Severe claustrophobia unresponsive to oral anxiolytics
- Subjects with any medical condition or other circumstances that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would significantly decrease the reliability of data, achievement of study objectives or completing the study.
- Pregnant, lactating, or breastfeeding women.
- Potential pregnant women of childbearing potential\[1\] not using effective contraceptives\[2\]. Potential pregnancy will be ascertained by a pregnancy test (urine humane choriogonadotropin (HCG) or serum HCG) \< 48 hours before injection with 68Ga-FAPI-46.
- Inability to remain still for the duration of the examination
- Women of childbearing potential are defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, i.e., not sterilized (bilateral tubectomy/occlusion, hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy) and not post-menopausal. In cases of uncertain menopausal status, serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels and menstruation history can be assessed.
- Effective contraceptives include sexual abstinence, vasectomized partner, combined hormonal contraception (oral, intravaginal, transdermal), progesterone-only contraceptive (oral, injectable, implantable), or working intrauterine device (hormonal, non-hormonal).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Aalborg University Hospital
Aalborg, North Denmark, 9000, Denmark
Related Publications (15)
Kratochwil C, Flechsig P, Lindner T, Abderrahim L, Altmann A, Mier W, Adeberg S, Rathke H, Rohrich M, Winter H, Plinkert PK, Marme F, Lang M, Kauczor HU, Jager D, Debus J, Haberkorn U, Giesel FL. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: Tracer Uptake in 28 Different Kinds of Cancer. J Nucl Med. 2019 Jun;60(6):801-805. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.227967. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
PMID: 30954939BACKGROUNDLindner T, Loktev A, Altmann A, Giesel F, Kratochwil C, Debus J, Jager D, Mier W, Haberkorn U. Development of Quinoline-Based Theranostic Ligands for the Targeting of Fibroblast Activation Protein. J Nucl Med. 2018 Sep;59(9):1415-1422. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.210443. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
PMID: 29626119BACKGROUNDKessler L, Ferdinandus J, Hirmas N, Bauer S, Dirksen U, Zarrad F, Nader M, Chodyla M, Milosevic A, Umutlu L, Schuler M, Podleska LE, Schildhaus HU, Fendler WP, Hamacher R. 68Ga-FAPI as a Diagnostic Tool in Sarcoma: Data from the 68Ga-FAPI PET Prospective Observational Trial. J Nucl Med. 2022 Jan;63(1):89-95. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262096. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
PMID: 33931468BACKGROUNDRohrich M, Naumann P, Giesel FL, Choyke PL, Staudinger F, Wefers A, Liew DP, Kratochwil C, Rathke H, Liermann J, Herfarth K, Jager D, Debus J, Haberkorn U, Lang M, Koerber SA. Impact of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT Imaging on the Therapeutic Management of Primary and Recurrent Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomas. J Nucl Med. 2021 Jun 1;62(6):779-786. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.253062. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
PMID: 33097632BACKGROUNDDendl K, Schlittenhardt J, Staudinger F, Kratochwil C, Altmann A, Haberkorn U, Giesel FL. The Role of Fibroblast Activation Protein Ligands in Oncologic PET Imaging. PET Clin. 2021 Jul;16(3):341-351. doi: 10.1016/j.cpet.2021.03.012.
PMID: 34053578BACKGROUNDPang Y, Zhao L, Luo Z, Hao B, Wu H, Lin Q, Sun L, Chen H. Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG Uptake in Gastric, Duodenal, and Colorectal Cancers. Radiology. 2021 Feb;298(2):393-402. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020203275. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
PMID: 33258746BACKGROUNDQin C, Song Y, Gai Y, Ruan W, Liu Q, Liu F, Zheng D, Zhang P, Liu H, Zhang T, Tao K, Lan X. Gallium-68-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor PET in gastrointestinal cancer: insights into diagnosis and management. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 Oct;49(12):4228-4240. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05847-0. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
PMID: 35657428BACKGROUNDQin C, Shao F, Gai Y, Liu Q, Ruan W, Liu F, Hu F, Lan X. 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR in the Evaluation of Gastric Carcinomas: Comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2022 Jan;63(1):81-88. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.258467. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
PMID: 33863819BACKGROUNDGundogan C, Komek H, Can C, Yildirim OA, Kaplan I, Erdur E, Poyraz K, Guzel Y, Oruc Z, Cakabay B. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in the staging and restaging of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nucl Med Commun. 2022 Jan 1;43(1):64-72. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001489.
PMID: 34661379BACKGROUNDJiang D, Chen X, You Z, Wang H, Zhang X, Li X, Ren S, Huang Q, Hua F, Guan Y, Zhao J, Xie F. Comparison of [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]-FDG for the detection of primary and metastatic lesions in patients with gastric cancer: a bicentric retrospective study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 Jan;49(2):732-742. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05441-w. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
PMID: 34297193BACKGROUNDAlan-Selcuk N, Ergen S, Demirci E, Ocak M, Kabasakal L. [68Ga]DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging in a case of a signet ring cell carcinoma of stomach. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Dec;48(13):4523-4524. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05213-6. Epub 2021 Jun 19. No abstract available.
PMID: 34148117BACKGROUNDFan C, Guo W, Su G, Chen B, Chen H. Widespread Metastatic Gastric Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma Shown by 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2021 Feb 1;46(2):e78-e79. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000003245.
PMID: 32804764BACKGROUNDBossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC, Kressel HY, Rifai N, Golub RM, Altman DG, Hooft L, Korevaar DA, Cohen JF; STARD Group. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ. 2015 Oct 28;351:h5527. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5527.
PMID: 26511519BACKGROUNDBentestuen M, Al-Obaydi N, Zacho HD. FAPI-avid nonmalignant PET/CT findings: An expedited systematic review. Semin Nucl Med. 2023 Sep;53(5):694-705. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.02.001. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
PMID: 36813670BACKGROUNDMeyer C, Dahlbom M, Lindner T, Vauclin S, Mona C, Slavik R, Czernin J, Haberkorn U, Calais J. Radiation Dosimetry and Biodistribution of 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET Imaging in Cancer Patients. J Nucl Med. 2020 Aug;61(8):1171-1177. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.236786. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
PMID: 31836685BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 2, 2023
First Posted
June 12, 2023
Study Start
February 15, 2024
Primary Completion
December 18, 2025
Study Completion
December 18, 2025
Last Updated
December 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share