Evaluating Treatment Continuation in Telehealth Patients Receiving an Automated Patient-Reported Outcome Tool
The Design, Implementation, and Impact of Automated Patient-reported Outcome Data Collection and Adverse Event Surveillance Tool on Treatment Continuation: an Iterative Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Approach
1 other identifier
interventional
2,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Engaging patients through integration of patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical care can improve the patient experience and provide a systematic way to collect adverse event (AE) data. Collecting these data on a large scale can inform new solutions to longstanding barriers to successful treatment such as medication non-adherence. This study evaluated whether implementing a patient-reported outcome data collection and AE surveillance tool would result in greater treatment continuation for patients receiving care on a telehealth platform. We evaluated how this data collection and surveillance tool - a short prompt for patients to provide information on treatment satisfaction and side effects - impacted the outcome of interest, treatment continuation. We tested two cycles in n=2,000 patients receiving care for erectile dysfunction on a telehealth platform using a randomized control experimental design and accounted for incidents where true randomization was not possible during implementation. The first cycle tested the tool alone, while the second cycle tested the tool in conjunction with a messaging template system that provided standardized side effect counseling.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 8, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 16, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 8, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 8, 2023
CompletedJune 8, 2023
May 1, 2023
1 month
May 8, 2023
May 31, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Odds of refilling prescription and percent of patients who refilled prescription for patients with an initial auto-refill plan of 1 month
Odds of refilling prescription (logistic regression); percent of patients who refilled prescription (log rank test from Kaplan Meier curve)
91 days
Odds of refilling prescription and percent of patients who refilled prescription for patients with an initial auto-refill plan of 3 months
Odds of refilling prescription (logistic regression); percent of patients who refilled prescription (log rank test from Kaplan Meier curve)
123 days
Study Arms (2)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONDid not receive the tool
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALDid receive the tool
Interventions
Patients received a short prompt to provide information on treatment satisfaction and side effects
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male patients living in the US, who were diagnosed with erectile dysfunction by a telehealth provider, and who were prescribed phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors as treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Rolead
Study Sites (1)
Ro HQ
New York, New York, 10011, United States
Related Publications (1)
Zhou MS, Jain T, Hardy N, Perez-Segura A, Hickman J, Leopold L, Qualliotine K, Yedidi RS, Whetsell M, Broffman L. The design, implementation, and impact of an automated patient-reported outcome data collection and adverse event surveillance tool: a randomized trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 20;23(1):1277. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10231-1.
PMID: 37986191DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Lauren Broffman, PhD
Ro
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2023
First Posted
June 8, 2023
Study Start
October 8, 2020
Primary Completion
November 16, 2020
Study Completion
November 16, 2020
Last Updated
June 8, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
We are not planning to share IPD at this time, due to concerns around patient privacy.