Painless Sharp Wound Debridement With Lidocaine-23%-Tetra-caine-7% Gel Versus EMLA 5% Cream
LIDOTETRA
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In a single-blind, crossover, randomized, controlled trial with 40 participants we aim to demonstrate superior anaesthetic efficacy of lidocaine-23%-tetracaine-7% (IMP2) gel over EMLA 5% cream (IMP1) at comparable safety in sharp wound debridement of chronic leg ulcers. This is a monocentric investigator initiated trial conducted in the University Hospital Zurich. In this longitudinal trial, participants receive a sequence of different treatments (treatments on different days) and therefore are randomly assigned to one of two treatment sequences. One-half of participants will first receive IMP1 (first treatment visit, randomized) and then IMP2 (second treatment visit, crossover); the other half of participants the reverse sequence (first treatment visit: IMP2, second treatment visit: IMP1). Primary Objective: We want to show that IMP 2 (lidocaine-23%-tetracaine-7% gel) is more effective in pain reduction than IMP 1 (EMLA® 5% cream) in sharp wound debridement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Jun 2023
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 17, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 6, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2023
CompletedJune 6, 2023
June 1, 2023
5 months
May 17, 2023
June 5, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Local anaesthetic efficacy
Local anaesthetic efficacy during sharp wound debridement will be assessed with Visual Analogue Scale for pain 15 seconds after start of sharp debridement or earlier in case debridement is completed in less than 15 seconds or early terminated due to intolerable pain.
15 seconds after start of sharp debridement, pain will be assessed with Visual Analogue Scale
Study Arms (2)
IMP2 (lidocaine-23%-tetracaine-7% gel)
EXPERIMENTALIMP1 (EMLA 5% cream)
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Applied in a 2 mm thick even layer for 30 minutes on the ulcer with an occlusive dressing. During the second treatment the same dose is applied. Immediately after removal of the occlusive dressing, the rest of the preparation will be removed and sharp debridement will be performed. In order to minimise bias in this crossover trial, the localisation of start (most distal part of Wound) of sharp debridement and the sequence of sharp debridement (if more than one wound; from the largest to the smallest) is defined in the first visit.
Applied in a 2 mm thick even layer for 30 minutes on the ulcer with an occlusive dressing. During the second treatment the same dose is applied. Immediately after removal of the occlusive dressing, the rest of the preparation will be removed and sharp debridement will be performed. In order to minimise bias in this crossover trial, the localisation of start (most distal part of Wound) of sharp debridement and the sequence of sharp debridement (if more than one wound; from the largest to the smallest) is defined in the first visit.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants between 18 years and 90 years
- Chronic leg ulcer(s) (duration \> 4 weeks) with biofilm or necrotic layers which require consecutive sharp debridement for at least two times (of the same ulcer)
- Minimal ulcer area of 1 cm2
- Leg ulcer has to enter into one of the following well defined aetiologies: venous, mixed venous-arterial, arterial, hypertensive ischemic leg ulcer (Martorell), vasculitic, ecthyma (covering \>90% of all observed leg ulcers)
- Informed consent as documented by signature and being able to follow the study protocol (cognition)
- Proficiency in German, oral and written information
You may not qualify if:
- Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding (Women of childbearing potential need to perform a pregnancy test (urine test) within 24 hours prior to the study intervention and need at least one simple acceptable contraceptive method)
- Participants with hypersensitivity or allergy to lidocaine, prilocaine, tetracaine or auxiliary supplies contained in either EMLA® 5% cream or lidocaine-23%-tetracaine-7% gel.
- Participants with peripheral neuropathy (over 4/10 insensitive points with Semmes monofilament) are excluded due to disturbed pain perception, which could potentially influence the results.
- Participants that were previously included in this clinical trial
- Participants with a total wound area larger than 200 cm2
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Juerg Hafnerlead
Study Sites (1)
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland
Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- University Hospital Zurich
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 17, 2023
First Posted
June 6, 2023
Study Start
June 1, 2023
Primary Completion
October 31, 2023
Study Completion
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
June 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share