Pain Neuroscience Education and Motor Imagery-based Exercise Protocol for Patients With Fibromyalgia
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main aim of this study is to find out whether applying both pain neuroscience education (PNE) and motor imagery-based exercise protocol (MIEP) will primarily reduce the pain of fibromyalgia. These therapies could show an evidence of improvement in fibromyalgia patients. However, there are no studies evaluating their effectiveness in combination. Secondary outcomes: To assess motor imagery ability of PNE in fibromyalgia patients To assess motor imagery ability of MIEP in fibromyalgia patients To evaluate the motor imagery ability of PNE+MIEP combined in fibromyalgia patients To evaluate pain beliefs of PNE in fibromyalgia patients To assess the pain beliefs of MIEP in fibromyalgia patients Combined PNE+MIEP to assess pain beliefs in fibromyalgia patients. To assess fear of movement in fibromyalgia patients of PNE To assess fear of movement in fibromyalgia patients of MIEP Combined PNE+MIEP to assess fear of movement in patients with fibromyalgia PNE to assess anxiety, depression, cognitive and mood in patients with fibromyalgia. To assess anxiety, depression, cognitive and mood in patients with fibromyalgia MIEP To evaluate anxiety, depression, cognitive and mood in patients with fibromyalgia together with PNE+MIEP PNE to assess self-esteem and body awareness in fibromyalgia patients. To assess self-esteem and body awareness in fibromyalgia patients of MIEP Combined PNE+MIEP to assess self-esteem and body awareness in fibromyalgia patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 20, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 14, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 2, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 16, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 6, 2023
CompletedJune 6, 2023
May 1, 2023
2 months
May 16, 2023
May 25, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
12 weeks
The Motion Imagery Questionnaire-3 (HLFS-3)
12 weeks
The Pain Beliefs Questionnaire (PBQ)
12 weeks
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
12 weeks
The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
12 weeks
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONNo intervention was applied to fibromyalgia patients in this group. This was because it was a control group that would evaluate the effects on outcomes by comparing them with other intervention (behavioral) groups.
Motor imagery-based exercise protocol (MIEP)
EXPERIMENTALMotor imagery-based exercise protocol (MIEP) applied in this group.
Pain neuroscience education (PNE)
EXPERIMENTALPain neuroscience education (PNE) applied in this group.
Combination Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORBoth Pain neuroscience education (PNE) and Motor imagery-based exercise protocol (MIEP) applied in this group.
Interventions
Pain neuroscience education (PNE) is a health education intervention that aims to provide up-to-date information on neuroscience developments in the field of chronic pain. All patients were trained once a week for 12 weeks, in groups of 3-4 people, for a maximum of 6 sessions and a minimum of 60 minutes. During the intervention, psychological factors such as self-efficacy, pain intervention/injury, coping with pain, catastrophic thoughts, emotional response to pain, anxiety, frustration/anger, fear of harm, concerns about pain, and fear of pain were examined. and discussed with patients. The sessions aimed to provide patients with a better understanding of their chronic pain by addressing the multifactorial aspects of chronic pain, sensitization and the plasticity of the brain, thus involving patients in treatment.
All patients performed sessions of maximum 60 minutes in groups of 3-4 people twice a week for 12 weeks. This study protocol was developed in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. The key standard was to practice simple and safe exercises that would encourage the patient to repeat the program at home. The exercises proposed in MIEP were selected according to the following principles: slowness, painlessness, arousing attention, easy to imagine. The main purpose of the motor imagery exercises was to bring the patient back to the state of "feeling and self-perception" of the execution of the movement. More important than the "quantity" of repetition was the painless "quality" of movement. It was performed in 3 phases: relaxation (3 minutes), MI (8.5 minutes per image) and refocus (3 minutes), which included both kinesthetic imagery (KI) and visual imagery (VI).
Subjects received 6 sessions of Pain neuroscience education (PNE) and 12 weeks (2 times a week) of Motor imagery-based exercise protocol (MIEP).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Experiencing widespread chronic pain for more than 12 months
- Pain in at least 12 or more of 18 tender points with a pressure of 5 kg/cm2
- to 60 years old
- Not using pharmacological therapeutics
- Not having participated in any pain program.
- Not having participated in any physical exercise programs in the last twelve
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- Not being able to do a physical activity program
- Currently receiving treatment with any alternative medical methods (eg.hyperbaric).
- Cardiovascular, psychiatric, autoimmune, cancer, etc. children with secondary different disease
- Other causes of chronic pain
- Receiving any treatment support related to pain
- Mental disability status
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Uskudar University
Istanbul, 34662, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Selin Kırcali, Msc
Üsküdar University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assoc. Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 16, 2023
First Posted
June 6, 2023
Study Start
November 20, 2022
Primary Completion
January 14, 2023
Study Completion
May 2, 2023
Last Updated
June 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05