Contactless Vital Signs Measurement Study (CVMS)
CVMS
Validation of a Contactless Sensor for Measuring Vital Signs for Hospital Inpatients
1 other identifier
observational
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study asks the question - Can vital signs be accurately measured via a contactless device and can this be independently done by inpatients in their homes? Primary objectives are to validate the accuracy of contactless vital sign measurements in comparison with vital signs measurements of heart rate, oxygen saturation, temperature using standard ward equipment (the reference standard).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Apr 2023
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 21, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 5, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 2, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2023
CompletedJune 6, 2023
March 1, 2023
3 months
March 21, 2023
June 3, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Accuracy validation - heart rate
Concordance of heart rate (beats per minute) measurements via the test device in comparison with nurse-conducted measurements of heart rate using standard ward equipment (reference standard). These measurements are deemed to be similar and acceptable for clinical purposes if within +/- 10% of the reference standard.
7 days
Accuracy validation - pulse oximetry for peripheral venous blood oxygen saturation
Concordance of pulse oximetry (percentage saturation) measurements via the test device in comparison with nurse-conducted pulse oximetry measurements of peripheral blood oxygen saturation using standard ward equipment (reference standard). These measurements are deemed to be similar and acceptable for clinical purposes if within +/- 10% of the reference standard.
7 days
Accuracy validation - temperature
Concordance of peripheral temperature (degree celsius) measurements via the test device in comparison with nurse-conducted temperature measurements using standard ward equipment (reference standard). These measurements are deemed to be similar and acceptable for clinical purposes if within +/- 10% of the reference standard.
7 days
Study Arms (2)
Hospitalised inpatients
Ten patients admitted into the Acute Care of the Elderly (ACE) ward will be approached for inclusion in the study. Patients will be given written information about the trial. Nursing staff looking after these patients will be asked to utilise the device after vital sign measurements obtained from standard hospital equipment when conducting routine vital sign measurements. Nurses will do this for the duration of the admission of 7days, thus generating 28 paired data points for comparison.
Inpatients at home
Fifteen patients admitted into the home-based ward would be approached for inclusion in the study. Participants will undergo a 20 minute education session then be supplied with the device, companion app (user interface) on a mobile tablet, and written information about the trial. Participants will be asked to measure their vital signs four times a day, with one of those measurements occurring immediately after the clinical nurse' home review using standard hospital equipment for vital sign measurements (this matched pair of vital signs measurements will be taken as reference). Participants will do this for at least 7 days, thus generating 7 matched data points for comparison against reference, and 21 data points where participants independently conducted vital signs measurements with the Norbert sensor.
Interventions
Validation of the combined device measurements compared with standard of care devices
Eligibility Criteria
Admitted patients that will require routine vital signs measurements with routine hospital equipment as part of standard of care; who will also be able to utilise a contactless vital sign measurement device at a matched timeframe to their routine vital signs measurements.
You may qualify if:
- Admitted inpatients within two hospital wards
- Patients expected to remain admitted within the two wards over 7 days of the study for availability of their vital sign measurements
- technological capability to utilise the device's companion app, as evidenced by ownership and utilisation of a 'smart' device (eg smartphone)
You may not qualify if:
- Cognitive disability impeding participants' ability to independently conduct vital sign measurements
- Clinical instability impeding participants' ability to independently conduct vital sign measurements
- Physical concerns (e.g. manual dexterity) impeding participants' ability to independently conduct vital sign measurements
- Environmental and technical issues such as lack of home Wi-Fi system, location of home in a 'Wi-Fi black spot', or unsafe home environments, that impede participants' ability to independently conduct vital sign measurements
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Melbourne Healthlead
Study Sites (1)
Royal Melbourne Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 21, 2023
First Posted
June 2, 2023
Study Start
April 5, 2023
Primary Completion
July 1, 2023
Study Completion
September 1, 2023
Last Updated
June 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share