Evaluation of Home Use COVID-19 Frequent Antigen Testing and Data Reporting
Chelsea_MA
Community Study to Evaluate the Performance of COVID-19 Frequent Antigen Testing at Home Through Digital Health Reporting
2 other identifiers
interventional
1,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The current standard of care for diagnostic of SARS-CoV-2 infection involves sample collection which is then prepared and measured via real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). This process is time consuming and dependent on expensive instrumentation and trained technicians to perform both the sample preparation and assay. In many cases, sample turn-around times can take hours to several days. There are no established monitoring nationwide protocols for COVID-19 prevention of infection. Due to the lack of such protocols, this study will provide the proper experience to design a safe monitoring schema of asymptomatic cases of COVID-19. Self-testing using currently available RDT has a high specificity and relatively high sensitivity to identify individuals with a high probability of contagiousness. Therefore, we intend to use these RDT (Rapid diagnostic tests) for other use. There are several studies that point to the importance of the use of RDTs to monitor COVID-19 (3). The recent metadata indicate that the performance of the antigen test is crucial for obtaining good results to detect positive cases. We have already validated in the laboratory and using relevant clinical samples several different labels of antigen tests and we have compared them with already approved USA FDA antigen tests to confirm their performance prior to using them in this study. This project aims to monitor once a week the presence of SARS CoV-2 antigens using anterior nares (AN) swab self-process, executing the test and recording of the result, immediately after. The lack of affordable diagnostic tests which can detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the general population which can give near real-time results is one critical missing control intervention in USA for the control of the pandemic and the spread of this disease. As public health restrictions begin to ease and people return to normal activities, while the COVID-19 pandemic is still a threat, a rapid diagnostic assay that does not require the sophisticated laboratory equipment and techniques could provide a significant advantage to screen asymptomatic individuals. The routine use of such rapid tests is a key element to show efficacy of protocol. We adjusted to once a week testing based on the medium to low risk of the elderly population of this study. The list of rapid nucleoprotein tests utilized in the current study are: NETO Corona test, Novir INSTA-TM COVID-19 Rapid Antigen test, COVICHEK COVID-19 Ag Test, SpectraBiotech COVID-19 track antigen test, Blandford Biotech AS-15â„¢ Rapid Antigen Detection Kit SARS-CoV-2 Test (Colloidal Gold Method), Abbott BinaxNow tests. BACKGROUND The SARS-CoV-2 Direct Antigen Rapid Test ("Lateral flow") is an immunoassay developed for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 viral particles/secreted protein in anterior nasal swabs and/or saliva samples from both asymptomatic and suspected participants with COVID-19 infection. Lateral flow strips are printed with a monoclonal antibody that binds the signature SARS-CoV-2 viral particles/protein (Test line) and a control antibody (Control line) for quality control. A second monoclonal antibody is attached to gold nanoparticles (conjugate) and quencher buffer, and mixed with the nasal sample. The SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein attach to both antibodies resulting in a visual line on the test strip within 15 minutes. Prior experience in the detection of virus and viral proteins via antibody binding using lateral flow have been done through IDx20, Inc. The Housing Authority and the Public Health Department of the City of Chelsea will be overseeing this study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Dec 2021
Typical duration for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 13, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 21, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 21, 2023
CompletedJune 5, 2023
June 1, 2023
1.9 years
May 30, 2023
June 1, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic tests results positive or negative
PPA and NPA are calculated when comparing antigen tests to PCR results
12 months
Study Arms (1)
PCR comparator
OTHERAnother molecular test like PCR will be done to confirm the positive and negative antigen test
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- older than 12 years of age
You may not qualify if:
- critical ill
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Chelsea Housing Authority
Chelsea, Massachusetts, 02150, United States
Related Publications (2)
Harmon A, Chang C, Salcedo N, Sena B, Herrera BB, Bosch I, Holberger LE. Validation of an At-Home Direct Antigen Rapid Test for COVID-19. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2126931. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.26931.
PMID: 34448871BACKGROUNDKirby JE, Riedel S, Dutta S, Arnaout R, Cheng A, Ditelberg S, Hamel DJ, Chang CA, Kanki PJ. Sars-Cov-2 antigen tests predict infectivity based on viral culture: comparison of antigen, PCR viral load, and viral culture testing on a large sample cohort. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023 Jan;29(1):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.07.010. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
PMID: 35863629BACKGROUND
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Irene Bosch, PhD
IDX20 Inc
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 30, 2023
First Posted
June 1, 2023
Study Start
December 13, 2021
Primary Completion
November 21, 2023
Study Completion
November 21, 2023
Last Updated
June 5, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06