Compartive Evalution of the Efficiency of Maxillary Canine Retraction Using Power Chain Versus Burstone T-loop

NCT05882526 | Unknown

• 1 other identifier: canine retraction in tooth
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 12
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

evaluate and compare the efficiency between elastomeric chains and burston T-loop retractors in terms of rate of maxillary canine retraction and canine movements

Conditions

Class I Malocclusion

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

• rate of canine retraction

  distance which canine move pre and post retraction

  FOUR months

• Canine rotation

  angulation of canine

  4 MONTH

• canine tipping

  canine movement in mesial and dISTAL

  4 month

Study Arms (2)

Evaluation of elastomeric power chain for orthodontic maxillary canine retraction

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

20 Orthodontic patient treated by for elastomeric power chain canine retraction split mouth.

Device: BURSTONE T-LOOP

Evaluation of T loop for orthodontic maxillary canine retraction

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

20 Orthodontic patient treated by T loop for canine retraction split mouth

Device: BURSTONE T-LOOP

Interventions

BURSTONE T-LOOP DEVICE

Split mouth study one side using elastomeric power chain and other side using T loops

Also known as: elastomeric power chain

Evaluation of T loop for orthodontic maxillary canine retraction; Evaluation of elastomeric power chain for orthodontic maxillary canine retraction

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 14 Years - 25 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Child (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• \- Class I or bimaxillary protursion , orthodontic patients, with moderate to severe crowding who are indicated for maxillary first premolar extraction. 2- All permanent teeth are erupted (3rd molars are not included). 3- Good oral and general health. 4- No previous orthodontic treatment.

You may not qualify if:

• \- Orthodontic cases that could be treated with no indication for extraction therapy.
• Orthodontic cases that are indicate for the extraction of any tooth other than maxillary first premolars. 3- Patients with systemic diseases that might interfere with the of orthodontic tooth movement.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Mansoura University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Mansoura University

Al Mansurah, 050, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (2)

• Barsoum HA, ElSayed HS, El Sharaby FA, Palomo JM, Mostafa YA. Comprehensive comparison of canine retraction using NiTi closed coil springs vs elastomeric chains. Angle Orthod. 2021 Jul 1;91(4):441-448. doi: 10.2319/110620-916.1.

  PMID: 34181721 RESULT

• Davis S, Sundareswaran S, James J. Comparative evaluation of the efficiency of canine retraction using modified Marcotte and T-loop retraction springs - A split-mouth, randomized clinical trial. J Orthod Sci. 2019 May 23;8:9. doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_101_18. eCollection 2019.

  PMID: 31161132 RESULT

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Malocclusion, Angle Class I

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Malocclusion; Tooth Diseases; Stomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

• AHMED MAHER FOUDA

  Mansoura University

  STUDY CHAIR

• nehal fouad elbelasy

  Mansoura University

  STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: investigator

Model Details: Evaluation of T loop for orthodontic maxillary canine retraction Evaluation of POWER CHAIN for orthodontic maxillary canine retraction

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: May 21, 2023
• First Posted: May 31, 2023
• Study Start: May 15, 2023
• Primary Completion: October 1, 2024
• Study Completion: December 1, 2024
• Last Updated: May 31, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-05

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

EG (1)