NCT05878197

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine and compare the effects of different voice therapy programs in children with vocal fold nodules. Vocal fold nodules are non-cancerous growths on the vocal folds which cause hoarseness. The main questions this trial aims to answer are:

  • What are the short-term effects of the new voice therapy program 'straw phonation' and a more traditional 'resonant voice therapy' program on (a) the vocal quality, (b) the size of the growths on the vocal folds, and (c) the overall functioning in children with vocal fold nodules? During straw phonation exercises, you make sound through a drinking straw. During resonant voice therapy exercises or 'humming', you make an 'm' sound as you breathe out.
  • What are the long-term effects of these voice therapy programs? Participants will receive a short-term intensive voice therapy program of four days. The researchers will compare the straw phonation group, resonant voice therapy group and control group to see if voice therapy works well in treating children with vocal fold nodules. The researchers hypothesize that straw phonation will have better results than resonant voice therapy. Straw phonation exercises are easier for children because they use an external tool (the straw) and less self-correction is needed.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 29, 2019

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 3, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 3, 2023

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 18, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 26, 2023

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 10, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

October 10, 2024

Status Verified

October 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3.7 years

First QC Date

April 18, 2023

Results QC Date

May 22, 2024

Last Update Submit

October 4, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

semi-occluded vocal tract therapystraw phonationresonant voice therapyvocal hygiene

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Change in Dysphonia Severity Index

    The dysphonia severity index (DSI) is a multiparametric score to quantify vocal capabilities. It is based on a weighted combination of 4 voice parameters: maximum phonation time (MPT, s), highest frequency (F-high, Hz), lowest intensity (I-low, dB) and jitter (%). The DSI is constructed as 0.13 MPT + 0.0053 F-high - 0.26 I-low - 1.18 jitter +12.4. The index ranges from -5 to +5. A score above +1.6 is considered normal. A higher score corresponds with better voice quality / vocal capacities.

    pre: one day before therapy, day 0; post: immediately after last therapy session, day 4

  • Change in Acoustic Voice Quality Index

    The acoustic voice quality index (AVQI) is a multiparametric score to quantify vocal quality. It is based on a weighted combination of 6 voice parameters: smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPS), harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR), shimmer local (SL), shimmer local dB (SLdB), general slope of the spectrum (slope) and tilt of the regression line through the spectrum (tilt). The formula is constructed as 9.072 - 0.245 × CPPs - 0.161 × HNR - 0.470 × SL + 6.158 × SLdB - 0.071 × Slope - 0.170 × Tilt and ranges from 0 to 10. A lower score correlates with a better vocal quality.

    pre: one day before therapy, day 0; post: immediately after last therapy session, day 4

  • Change in Pediatric Voice Handicap Index (pVHI)

    The pediatric voice handicap index (pVHI) is a questionnaire to investigate children's voice-related quality of life, completed by the parents. The index ranges from 0 to 92. A higher score correlates with more psychosocial impact of the voice disorder.

    pre: one day before therapy, day 0; post: immediately after last therapy session, day 4

  • Change in Overall Severity From Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice

    This tool is designed to describe the severity of dysphonia by rating six parameters (overall severity, roughness, breathiness, strain, pitch, and loudness) on a visual-analog scale from 0 to 100, where 0 is considered within normal limits. A higher score corresponds with worse voice quality.

    pre: one day before therapy, day 0; post: immediately after last therapy session, day 4

Study Arms (3)

Experimental group 1 - Straw Phonation

EXPERIMENTAL

Short-term intensive voice therapy program of one week (3 hours a day for 4 consecutive days): straw phonation and vocal hygiene recommendations

Behavioral: Straw phonation

Experimental group 2 - Resonant Voice Therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Short-term intensive voice therapy program of one week (3 hours a day for 4 consecutive days): resonant voice therapy and vocal hygiene recommendations

Behavioral: Resonant voice therapy

Control group

SHAM COMPARATOR

Short-term intensive voice therapy program of one week (3 hours a day for 4 consecutive days): vocal hygiene recommendations

Behavioral: Vocal Hygiene

Interventions

Straw phonationBEHAVIORAL

The two experimental groups will receive either straw phonation therapy or resonant voice therapy. The hierarchical structure of the therapy sessions will be equal for the three programs. In each session, vocal rest pauses will be foreseen by playing games, performing drawing assignments, etc. This will make the therapy more pleasant and less intensive. All voice therapy programs will be guided by the same experienced voice therapist. Content: Day 1: counseling (anatomy and physiology of the voice and vocal fold nodules), vocal hygiene recommendations (water intake, avoiding vocal misuse and abuse) Day 2: breathing exercises, vocal hygiene recommendations, straw phonation on vowel and syllable level, pitch variations Day 3: breathing exercises, vocal hygiene recommendations, straw phonation on word and sentence level, pitch variations Day 4: straw phonation in spontaneous speech, combination exercises

Experimental group 1 - Straw Phonation

The two experimental groups will receive either straw phonation therapy or resonant voice therapy. The hierarchical structure of the therapy sessions will be equal for the three programs. In each session, vocal rest pauses will be foreseen by playing games, performing drawing assignments, etc. This will make the therapy more pleasant and less intensive. All voice therapy programs will be guided by the same experienced voice therapist. Content: Day 1: counseling (anatomy and physiology of the voice and vocal fold nodules), vocal hygiene recommendations (water intake, avoiding vocal misuse and abuse) Day 2: breathing exercises, vocal hygiene recommendations, resonant voice therapy on vowel and syllable level, pitch variations Day 3: breathing exercises, vocal hygiene recommendations, resonant voice therapy on word and sentence level, pitch variations Day 4: resonant voice therapy in spontaneous speech, combination exercises

Experimental group 2 - Resonant Voice Therapy
Vocal HygieneBEHAVIORAL

Participants of the control group will receive a sham treatment, including the exact same games, drawing assignments, etc. as in the experimental groups. However, no SOVT or other active vocal techniques will be practiced. Vocal hygiene guidelines (e.g. avoid screaming, imitating voices, sufficient hydration etc.) will be kept equally in the four groups. All voice therapy programs will be guided by the same experienced voice therapist. Content: Day 1: counseling (anatomy and physiology of the voice and vocal fold nodules), vocal hygiene recommendations (water intake, avoiding vocal misuse and abuse) Day 2: breathing exercises, vocal hygiene recommendations Day 3: breathing exercises, vocal hygiene recommendations Day 4: combination exercises

Control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Years - 12 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • children aged between 6 and 12 years (primary school)
  • diagnosed with vocal fold nodules by an otorhinolaryngologist and speech-language pathologist experienced in voice diagnostics.

You may not qualify if:

  • nasal or ear diseases
  • neurological disorders

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ghent University Hospital

Ghent, East-Flanders, 9000, Belgium

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Hartnick C, Ballif C, De Guzman V, Sataloff R, Campisi P, Kerschner J, Shembel A, Reda D, Shi H, Sheryka Zacny E, Bunting G. Indirect vs Direct Voice Therapy for Children With Vocal Nodules: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Feb 1;144(2):156-163. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.2618.

    PMID: 29270612BACKGROUND
  • Kapsner-Smith MR, Hunter EJ, Kirkham K, Cox K, Titze IR. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Two Semi-Occluded Vocal Tract Voice Therapy Protocols. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Jun;58(3):535-49. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-13-0231.

    PMID: 25675335BACKGROUND
  • Carding PN, Roulstone S, Northstone K; ALSPAC Study Team. The prevalence of childhood dysphonia: a cross-sectional study. J Voice. 2006 Dec;20(4):623-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.07.004. Epub 2005 Dec 19.

    PMID: 16360302BACKGROUND
  • Meerschman I, Van Lierde K, Van Puyvelde C, Bostyn A, Claeys S, D'haeseleer E. Massed versus spaced practice in vocology: effect of a short-term intensive voice training versus a longer-term traditional voice training. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018 Mar;53(2):393-404. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12358. Epub 2017 Dec 5.

    PMID: 29205707BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

HoarsenessDysphonia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Voice DisordersLaryngeal DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesRespiration DisordersOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSigns and Symptoms, Respiratory

Limitations and Caveats

It was not possible to analyze the long-term results due to high drop-out.

Results Point of Contact

Title
drs. Anke Adriaansen
Organization
Ghent University

Study Officials

  • Kristiane Van Lierde

    University Hospital, Ghent

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2023

First Posted

May 26, 2023

Study Start

July 29, 2019

Primary Completion

April 3, 2023

Study Completion

April 3, 2023

Last Updated

October 10, 2024

Results First Posted

October 10, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations