NCT05865626

Brief Summary

This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility of using an instant messenger to monitor drug intake in tuberculosis patients and to assess cash incentive to improve adherence to drug intake

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 10, 2018

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2020

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2022

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 29, 2023

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 19, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

May 19, 2023

Status Verified

May 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

April 29, 2023

Last Update Submit

May 9, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • feasibility assessment

    proportion of participants in the intervention groups who regularly send the videos throughout the follow-up.

    at the end of study (2 years)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • adherence to the VOT

    at the end of study (2 years)

  • effect of cash incentives on adherence to the VOT

    at the end of study (2 years)

Study Arms (3)

VOT without cash incentive at the begining

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this group start VOT without financial motivation. In the second part of their follow-up, VOT is combined with financial motivation.

Other: VOT with and without cash incentive

VOT with cash incentive at the begining

EXPERIMENTAL

The participants in this group start the VOT with the financial motivation. In the second part of their follow-up, VOT is no longer associated with financial motivation

Other: VOT with and without cash incentive

Standard care

NO INTERVENTION

The participants in this group self-administer the anti-tuberculosis treatment as is done routinely.

Interventions

Here we are interested in the remote monitoring of TB treatment, and the impact that financial motivation can have on compliance with this monitoring. the cross-over here means that participants in each intervention group will at some point receive VOT without motivation and then VOT with motivation, depending on whether they start with one or the other combination

Also known as: VOT
VOT with cash incentive at the beginingVOT without cash incentive at the begining

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Older than 18 years
  • Signed informed consent form
  • Living in an area with mobile phone coverage
  • Have at least 3 months of treatment remaining

You may not qualify if:

  • Not being able to use a smartphone and unlikely to learn how to

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Centre de recherches médicales de Lambaréné

Lambaréné, 242, Gabon

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Belard S, Remppis J, Bootsma S, Janssen S, Kombila DU, Beyeme JO, Rossatanga EG, Kokou C, Osbak KK, Obiang Mba RM, Kaba HM, Traore AN, Ehrhardt J, Bache EB, Flamen A, Rusch-Gerdes S, Frank M, Adegnika AA, Lell B, Niemann S, Kremsner PG, Loembe MM, Alabi AS, Grobusch MP. Tuberculosis Treatment Outcome and Drug Resistance in Lambarene, Gabon: A Prospective Cohort Study. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Aug 3;95(2):472-80. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0668. Epub 2016 Jun 27.

    PMID: 27352879BACKGROUND
  • Elangovan R, Arulchelvan S. A Study on the Role of Mobile Phone Communication in Tuberculosis DOTS Treatment. Indian J Community Med. 2013 Oct;38(4):229-33. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.120158.

    PMID: 24302824BACKGROUND
  • Sinkou H, Hurevich H, Rusovich V, Zhylevich L, Falzon D, de Colombani P, Dadu A, Dara M, Story A, Skrahina A. Video-observed treatment for tuberculosis patients in Belarus: findings from the first programmatic experience. Eur Respir J. 2017 Mar 22;49(3):1602049. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02049-2016. Print 2017 Mar.

    PMID: 28331042BACKGROUND
  • Garfein RS, Collins K, Munoz F, Moser K, Cerecer-Callu P, Raab F, Rios P, Flick A, Zuniga ML, Cuevas-Mota J, Liang K, Rangel G, Burgos JL, Rodwell TC, Patrick K. Feasibility of tuberculosis treatment monitoring by video directly observed therapy: a binational pilot study. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015 Sep;19(9):1057-64. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.14.0923.

    PMID: 26260824BACKGROUND
  • Handbook for the use of digital technologies to support tuberculosis medication adherence. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.

    BACKGROUND
  • Iribarren SJ, Schnall R, Stone PW, Carballo-Dieguez A. Smartphone Applications to Support Tuberculosis Prevention and Treatment: Review and Evaluation. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 May 13;4(2):e25. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5022.

    PMID: 27177591BACKGROUND
  • Giordano V, Koch H, Godoy-Santos A, Dias Belangero W, Esteves Santos Pires R, Labronici P. WhatsApp Messenger as an Adjunctive Tool for Telemedicine: An Overview. Interact J Med Res. 2017 Jul 21;6(2):e11. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.6214.

    PMID: 28733273BACKGROUND
  • Seewoodharry MD, Maconachie GDE, Gillies CL, Gottlob I, McLean RJ. The Effects of Feedback on Adherence to Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of RCTs. Am J Prev Med. 2017 Aug;53(2):232-240. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.03.005. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

    PMID: 28456347BACKGROUND
  • Lutge EE, Wiysonge CS, Knight SE, Sinclair D, Volmink J. Incentives and enablers to improve adherence in tuberculosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 3;2015(9):CD007952. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007952.pub3.

    PMID: 26333525BACKGROUND
  • Stuurman AL, Vonk Noordegraaf-Schouten M, van Kessel F, Oordt-Speets AM, Sandgren A, van der Werf MJ. Interventions for improving adherence to treatment for latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Jun 8;16:257. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1549-4.

    PMID: 27268103BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Tuberculosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mycobacterium InfectionsActinomycetales InfectionsGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsBacterial InfectionsBacterial Infections and MycosesInfections

Study Officials

  • Bertarnd Lell, prof.

    Centre de Recherche Médicale de Lambaréné

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: In the intervention group, 20 subjects will receive a smartphone and one of the two incentives (close-follow-up or a financial incentive) over a 12 weeks period. After this period, the participant will receive the second incentive. The order is determined randomly with 10 participants receiving the incentives. Participants may receive a third incentive (social feedback) the earliest 6 weeks after the beginning of the treatment, in addition to the basic incentive. The 10 participants in the control group will not receive a smartphone but will be followed-up monthly.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2023

First Posted

May 19, 2023

Study Start

October 10, 2018

Primary Completion

June 30, 2020

Study Completion

June 30, 2022

Last Updated

May 19, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations