Correlation Between Computer Tomography Angiography and D-Dimer Level for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism
A Single-center Study for the Correlation Between Computer Tomography Angiography and D-Dimer Level for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism
1 other identifier
observational
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A blood sample was taken before starting the patients on any thrombolytic treatment. The positivity threshold for D-Dimer was above 250 ng/ml. CTPA was performed after performing blood sampling. Patients with confirmed pulmonary embolisms were admitted to ICU for continued monitoring of vitals, consciousness level, and signs of tissue perfusion. Signs of shock or hemodynamic instability should be observed regularly. Patients were managed in the ICU with anticoagulants by parenteral use. The most commonly used items were Heparin, either Unfractionated (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH).D-dimer levels can leverage to detect PE. D-dimer levels can help in guiding the option of CTPA and the initiation of treatment for patients with suspected PE.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Dec 2020
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 14, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 22, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 28, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 26, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 17, 2023
CompletedMay 17, 2023
May 1, 2023
2.1 years
April 26, 2023
May 6, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the robustness of d-dimer testing for PE compared to CTPA and identify the threshold values to support its use
the study aims to ascertain the robustness of d-dimer testing for PE compared to CTPA and identify the threshold values to support its use
26 MONTHS
Study Arms (2)
D-Dimer group
A blood sample was taken before starting the patients on any thrombolytic treatment. The latex agglutination test was used to measure plasma D-dimer level; this was done using a Sysmex CA-7000 automatic coagulation unit. The positivity threshold was above 250 ng/ml.
CTPA group
CTPA was performed after performing blood sampling using Siemens Somatom definition AS 24 slice scanners. Non-ionic water-soluble contrast Omnipaque 350 mg I/mg or Visipaque 320 mg I/mg was injected at 4 mm/s maximum dose 100 ml using a Medtron pressure injector.
Interventions
CTPA was performed after performing blood sampling using Siemens Somatom definition AS 24 slice scanners. Non-ionic water-soluble contrast Omnipaque 350 mg I/mg or Visipaque 320 mg I/mg was injected at 4 mm/s maximum dose 100 ml using a Medtron pressure injector.OR, A blood sample was taken before starting the patients on any thrombolytic treatment. The latex agglutination test was used to measure plasma D-dimer level; this was done using a Sysmex CA-7000 automatic coagulation unit. The positivity threshold was above 250 ng/ml.
Eligibility Criteria
28 patients included, 14 patients female and 14 patients of male gender with an average age of 55.4 ±11.2 years. Presenting symptoms were mainly dyspnea, chest pain or, cough, and shortness of breath. Twenty-four patients of the total number of cases were positive for CTPA while four patients were negative for PE by CTPA. No allergy to the contrast was recorded during our study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Zulekha Hospitals
Dubai, 457, United Arab Emirates
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
helena elizabith, consultant
Zulekha Hospitals
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 26, 2023
First Posted
May 17, 2023
Study Start
December 14, 2020
Primary Completion
January 22, 2023
Study Completion
January 28, 2023
Last Updated
May 17, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05