SIIT Based on UST CDST in Patients With CD
Efficacy and Safety of Selective Intensive Induction Therapy Based on Ustekinumab Clinical Decision-making Tools in Patients With Crohn's Disease: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study(SIIT-CD Study)
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
ustekinumab (UST) can effectively induce and maintain clinical remission and mucosal healing of Crohn's disease (CD), but some patients still have poor response. Dose optimization is an effective way to improve the response rate of UST, and re-intravenous induction is a common way of optimization. For patients with secondary loss of response, about half of the patients can re-respond after dose optimization. We plan to use CDST-UST to stratify the response level of patients before treatment, select patients with poor response, and initially give multiple intravenous therapy as an intensive induction therapy strategy, so as to improve the response rate of these patients and achieve individualized treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jun 2023
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 6, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 16, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2024
CompletedJuly 24, 2023
July 1, 2023
1 year
May 6, 2023
July 21, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference in clinical response rate at week 24 between intensive induction regimen and standard induction regimen
Difference in clinical response rate at week 24 between intensive induction regimen and standard induction regimen
week 24
Study Arms (2)
SIIT group
EXPERIMENTALNon-intensive induction therapy group
NO INTERVENTIONInterventions
At week 0 and week 8, UST was induced intravenously twice (stratified according to body weight, see instructions for dosage), and at the third time, intravenous or standard subcutaneous injection regimen was used according to CRP standard
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed with CD;
- Active period; Age 18-75 years old;
- UST-CDST scores were used to treat patients with moderate and low responsive activity
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects had undergone extensive colectomy, subtotal colectomy, or total colectomy; The subject currently has ileostomy and colostomy; Patients with significant liver, kidney, endocrine, respiratory, neurological or cardiovascular diseases; Patients with fibrous stenosis and prestenosis dilatation; Contraindications of UST as documented in other specifications.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
SixthSunYetSen
Guangzhou, 省/直辖市, 510655, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 6, 2023
First Posted
May 16, 2023
Study Start
June 1, 2023
Primary Completion
June 1, 2024
Study Completion
June 1, 2024
Last Updated
July 24, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07