NCT05857020

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of administering auricular acupressure for patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS), and evaluating the efficacy of auricular acupressure to reduce pain scores and decrease pain medication usage over time.

Trial Health

15
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2024

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 18, 2023

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 12, 2023

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2024

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

July 30, 2024

Status Verified

April 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

April 18, 2023

Last Update Submit

July 29, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

interstitial cystitisbladder pain syndromepelvic painurologic painurologic disease

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Pain scores using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    The NRS pain score is an 11-point pain scale in which patients will be asked to circle a number between 0 and 10 that best represents their current pain intensity. 0 usually indicates "no pain at all" and 10 indicates "worst pain imaginable."

    Baseline

  • Pain scores using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    The NRS pain score is an 11-point pain scale in which patients will be asked to circle a number between 0 and 10 that best represents their current pain intensity. 0 usually indicates "no pain at all" and 10 indicates "worst pain imaginable."

    Day 1

  • Pain scores using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    The NRS pain score is an 11-point pain scale in which patients will be asked to circle a number between 0 and 10 that best represents their current pain intensity. 0 usually indicates "no pain at all" and 10 indicates "worst pain imaginable."

    Day 2

  • Pain scores using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    The NRS pain score is an 11-point pain scale in which patients will be asked to circle a number between 0 and 10 that best represents their current pain intensity. 0 usually indicates "no pain at all" and 10 indicates "worst pain imaginable."

    Day 3

  • Pain scores using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    The NRS pain score is an 11-point pain scale in which patients will be asked to circle a number between 0 and 10 that best represents their current pain intensity. 0 usually indicates "no pain at all" and 10 indicates "worst pain imaginable."

    Day 4

  • Pain scores using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    The NRS pain score is an 11-point pain scale in which patients will be asked to circle a number between 0 and 10 that best represents their current pain intensity. 0 usually indicates "no pain at all" and 10 indicates "worst pain imaginable."

    Day 5

  • Change in Pain, Enjoyment, and General Activity (PEG) Assessment Scores

    The PEG assesses a patient's reported intensity of pain and interference with general activity. It involves three 11-point numeric rating scales (NRS) ranging from 0 ("no pain" or "does not interfere") to 10 ("pain as bad as you can imagine" or "completely interferes"). Scores from each NRS will be compared before and after use of the study intervention. Higher scores represent more pain and or increased enjoyment and activity interference.

    Day 5

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Change in amount of Opioid Use

    Baseline, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5

  • Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) Assessments

    Baseline and Day 5

  • Auricular Acupressure Acceptability - Likert scale scores

    Day 5

  • Auricular Acupressure Acceptability - auricular acupressure

    Day 5

  • Auricular Acupressure Acceptability - Feedback

    Day 5

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Auricular Acupressure (AA) Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will receive the AA intervention over a 5 day period in addition to their Standard of Care treatment for Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome (IC/BPS), and complete daily study questionnaires

Device: Auricular Acupressure

Interventions

Auricular Acupressure (AA) utilizing all-natural vaccaria ear seeds will be applied to 5 designated sites on each participant's ear (total of 10 seeds placed per patient). Participants will be asked if they consent to having their ear placement photographed after placement (optional) and audio recorded during interventionist ear seed placement (optional) in collaboration with the BAApress training fidelity study.

Auricular Acupressure (AA) Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age \>= 18 years
  • History of documented interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS)
  • Able to read and understand informed consent form in English

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a history of skin disease (e.g. psoriasis) involving the ear, adhesive allergy, recent scar tissue on ear, or current abrasions or cuts on the ear
  • Cognitive impairment (e.g. delirium, dementia)
  • Physical impairment preventing them from applying daily pressure/stimulation to ear seeds
  • Patients with cardiac pacemakers (contraindication to POINTER PAL)
  • Use of some types of hearing aids (which could potentially obstruct placements of ear seeds)
  • Any acute illness or psychiatric conditions that would impact adherence to the study requirements

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cystitis, InterstitialUrologic DiseasesChronic PainPelvic Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CystitisUrinary Bladder DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Stephen Walker, PhD

    Wake Forest University Health Sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Any patient who has been scheduled for a provider visit in the Urology clinic for a diagnosis of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) who fulfills eligibility criteria will be considered for participation in this study.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2023

First Posted

May 12, 2023

Study Start

July 1, 2024

Primary Completion

June 1, 2025

Study Completion

October 1, 2025

Last Updated

July 30, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share