Cardioinhibitory Reflex Syncope. Permanent Pacemaker Therapy or Cardioneuroablation?
PANACEA
Recurrent Cardioinhibitory Reflex Syncope. PermANent PAcemaker Therapy or CardionEuroablation? A Multicenter RAndomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
10
Brief Summary
Reflex syncope is the most common form of syncope. It can lead to injuries and affect quality of life. Nonpharmacological and medical therapies have limited effectiveness. In certain patients, cardiac pacing seem to be beneficial. More recently cardioneuroablation (CNA) has emerged as a novel therapy for reflex syncope. The investigators aim to determine whether CNA is more effective than cardiac pacing at reducing the rate of cardioinhibitory-type reflex syncope.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2023
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 20, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 22, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 22, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 22, 2027
January 25, 2024
January 1, 2024
3 years
April 20, 2023
January 22, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To determine the efficacy of CNA in the treatment of cardioinhibitory reflex syncope in comparison to pacemaker therapy.
Differences in 12-month syncope-free survival between the 2 groups
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
To evaluate the incidence of complications in the short and long terms for CNA compared to pacemaker therapy
1 and 12 months
In patients undergoing CNA, evaluation of the degree of long-term reinnervation using the tilt table test (HUTT)
1 and 12 months
In patients undergoing CNA, evaluation of the degree of long-term reinnervation using the atropine test
1 and 12 months
To determine which of the 2 strategies, CNA or cardiac pacing, is superior at preventing a composite of syncope and presyncope
12 months
Evaluations of changes in quality of life, comparing the two therapies
12 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Cardioneuroablation
EXPERIMENTALBi-atrial ablation of GPs: CARDIONEUROABLATION (Group A, n = 45)
Dual-chamber pacemaker
ACTIVE COMPARATORImplant of a dual-chamber CLS PACEMAKER\* (Group B, n = 45). \*or failing this, a dual-chamber pacemaker with RDR algorithm
Interventions
Ganglionated plexi will be localized using an empirical anatomical approach and/or a fractionated electrogram-based strategy. Point-by-point ablation will be performed using radiofrequency energy and an irrigated tip contact force sensing ablation catheter in a power control mode (35-50 W; AI, 350-500; LSI, 4.5-5.5). The right superior GP (RSGP), left superior GP (LSGP) and posterior left GP (PMLGP) will be targeted during CNA. Radiofrequency applications in other GPs will be left at the discretion of the operator. At the end of the procedure, another EP study and atropine test will be performed. Clinical endpoints for completion of the CNA will be: 1) a HR increase \>20% if the CNA was performed under general anesthesia/deep sedation; 2) improved electrophysiological parameters; 3) significant reduction in atropine response (HR increase \<10% after atropine); and 4) in case of using extracardiac vagal stimulation, lack of response.
All patients in the pacemaker group will receive a dual-chamber pacemaker that has the ability to be programmed in the DDD-CLS algorithm mode (or failing this, a dual-chamber pacemaker with RDR algorithm).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged more than 40 years.
- Having a 12-month history that includes at least two documented episodes of spontaneous reflex syncope or one episode that led to injury in addition to at least two presyncopal events, refractory to all recommended types of standard treatment.
- Bradycardia-syncope correlation (at least 3 seconds of asystole due to sinus arrest or atrio-ventricular block) confirmed by ECG during spontaneous syncope.
- If lacking ECG evidence during spontaneous syncope, a cardioinhibitory response (VASIS type 2A or 2B) on tilt test.
- Displaying indicators for pacing such as those suggested in the ESC guidelines for a class I recommendation for patients with reflex syncope.
- Significantly decreased quality of life due to syncope.
- Sinus rhythm on ECGs.
- Obtained written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Intrinsic sinus or atrioventricular nodal disease with a proven indication for permanent pacemaker implantation.
- Evidence of structural heart disease.
- Contraindications to ablation in the right or left atrium.
- Life expectancy \<12 months.
- Lacking willingness to comply with the randomization procedure.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
Hospital Universitario San Juan de Alicante
Sant Joan d'Alacant, Alicante, 03550, Spain
Hospital Universitari General de Castellón
Castellon, Castellón, 12004, Spain
Hospital Universitario Álvaro Cunqueiro de Vigo
Vigo, Pontevedra, 36312, Spain
Hospital del Mar
Barcelona, 08003, Spain
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08025, Spain
Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge
Barcelona, 08907, Spain
Hospital Universitari Dr. Josep Trueta
Girona, 17007, Spain
Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria
Santa Cruz de Tenerife, 38010, Spain
Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe
Valencia, 46026, Spain
Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa
Zaragoza, 50009, Spain
Related Publications (3)
Pachon JC, Pachon EI, Cunha Pachon MZ, Lobo TJ, Pachon JC, Santillana TG. Catheter ablation of severe neurally meditated reflex (neurocardiogenic or vasovagal) syncope: cardioneuroablation long-term results. Europace. 2011 Sep;13(9):1231-42. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur163. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
PMID: 21712276RESULTAksu T, Gupta D, D'Avila A, Morillo CA. Cardioneuroablation for vasovagal syncope and atrioventricular block: A step-by-step guide. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Oct;33(10):2205-2212. doi: 10.1111/jce.15480. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
PMID: 35362165RESULTPiotrowski R, Baran J, Sikorska A, Krynski T, Kulakowski P. Cardioneuroablation for Reflex Syncope: Efficacy and Effects on Autonomic Cardiac Regulation-A Prospective Randomized Trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 Jan;9(1):85-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.08.011. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
PMID: 36114133RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Rodolfo San Antonio, MD, PhD
Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 20, 2023
First Posted
May 11, 2023
Study Start
November 22, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 22, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 22, 2027
Last Updated
January 25, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share