Plasma On Chronic Wounds for Epidermal Regeneration
POWER
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
8
Brief Summary
Every year, 5 million people throughout Germany suffer from extensive, often chronic wounds. Cold plasma is an innovative therapeutic approach in the treatment of these persistent tissue defects. However, previous therapy options with cold plasma are very time-consuming, especially with increasing wound area, and are also strongly dependent on the skill of the practitioner. This study investigates the effectiveness of a system for reproducible application of cold plasma on larger areas and observes the effect of a 4-week additional plasma treatment on wound healing of large chronic wounds. The patient-related benefit of such an additional treatment will also be evaluated. Both study arms will receive guideline-based wound therapy, which is the current gold standard.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 24, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
March 18, 2026
March 1, 2026
5.3 years
April 24, 2023
March 16, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reduction in area of chronic wounds
The clinical trial is based on the following primary null hypothesis (H0): There is no significant difference in terms of reduction in area of chronic wounds between standard guideline-based wound therapy with and without initial 4-week plasma treatment. The associated alternative hypothesis (HA) is: There is a significant difference in terms of reduction in area of chronic wounds between standard guideline-based wound therapy with and without initial 4 weeks of plasma treatment
3 visits weekly for 4 weeks, follow-up at at 12 and 20 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Wound closures
during the 4-week active treatment phase, after 3 and after 6 months
Change in wound pain
during the 6-month observation period
Change in quality of life
during the 6-month observation period
Amount of germs/bacteria in the wound bed
during the 4-week active treatment phase
Study Arms (2)
Plasma (CAPT)
EXPERIMENTALConventional wound treatment according to S3 guideline, 3 visits weekly for 4 weeks, additive plasma treatment during each visit.
Standard wound treatment (SWT)
NO INTERVENTIONconventional wound treatment according to S3 guideline, 3 visits weekly for 4 weeks
Interventions
This study investigates the effectiveness of a system for reproducible application of cold plasma on larger areas and observes the effect of a 4-week additional plasma treatment on wound healing of large chronic wounds.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient Criteria:
- Patient must be at least 18 years old (legal age) and legally competent
- The patient has at least one diagnosed chronic (existing for at least 8 weeks), non-healing wound due to a UCA or UCV on the lower leg, below the knee
- There is a signed consent form dated by the patient's own hand
- Wound Criteria:
You may not qualify if:
- The initial wound area is 5 cm²-100 cm2
- The wound can be enclosed completely by the plasma applicator (10 cm x 10 cm)
- The wound is not undermined
- The wound is located on the lower leg
- Patient Criteria:
- The patient is younger than 18 years and/or lacks legal capacity
- The patient has already participated in this study
- The patient is already participating in another interventional study
- Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
- The patient has an implanted pacemaker, defibrillator or other active implants
- The patient has a light/sun allergy
- The patient has a silicone allergy
- The patient has had a thrombosis within the last 3 months
- The patient has a systemic and/or chronic infectious disease (e.g., HIV, tuberculosis, hepatitis)
- The patient has a tumour disease
- +15 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Coldplasmatechlead
- German Federal Ministry of Education and Researchcollaborator
Study Sites (8)
Universitäts-Hautklinik Tübingen
Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 72076, Germany
Zentrum Rothenaicher
München, Bavaria, 81927, Germany
Zentrum Regensburg
Regensburg, Bavaria, 93047, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
Katholisches Klinikum Bochum
Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, 44805, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden
Dresden, Saxony, 01307, Germany
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, State of Berlin, 10117, Germany
Verbund Thüringen-Kliniken "Georgius Agricola"
Saalfeld, Thuringia, 07318, Germany
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Robert Banaschik, Dr.
Coldplasmatech
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Isabel Zänker, Dr.
Thüringen-Kliniken
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2023
First Posted
May 11, 2023
Study Start
October 1, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
March 18, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03