Effect of Occupational Therapy at Home E-Rehabilitation (OTHER) for Persons Post-stroke
OTHER
Supporting Daily Functioning of Persons With a Neurological Disorder: (Cost)Effectiveness of Occupational Therapy at Home E-Rehabilitation (OTHER) for Persons Post-stroke
1 other identifier
interventional
171
1 country
9
Brief Summary
The goal of this (cost)effectiveness study is to compare care as usual with OTHER-intervention in Cerebro Vascular Accident (CVA) older adults in Geriatric Rehabilitation (GR). The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:
- 1.What is the effectiveness of OTHER, as compared to occupational therapy as usual (CAU), on improving the self-perceived performance in daily activities of community-dwelling older persons post-stroke over a 24-week period after initiation of OTHER or CAU, as measured longitudinally (at week 4, 13 and 26)?
- 2.What is the effectiveness of OTHER on improving satisfaction with the perceived daily performance of community-dwelling persons post-stroke, 26 weeks after start compared to usual OT? (quantitative approach)
- 3.What is the effectiveness of OTHER on improving physical activity of community-dwelling persons post-stroke, 26 weeks after start compared to usual OT? (quantitative approach)
- 4.What is the effectiveness of OTHER on improving self-management of community-dwelling persons post-stroke, 26 weeks after start compared to usual OT? (quantitative approach)
- 5.How do persons post-stroke and OT's experience and how do they reflect on OTHER in supporting a sense of self-management, safety and improving daily functioning? (qualitative approach).
- 6.What factors influenced the intervention delivery and the perceived benefits in the OTHER study (process evaluation)? 1) monitoring treatment fidelity, barriers and facilitators for implementation; 2) gain insight into the impact of OTHER on the GR transition to home; 3) to gain insight into what stroke survivors and OT's think of OTHER. 4) how participants, and professionals experience and thoughts they have on the OTHER-intervention in supporting daily functioning and self-management
- 7.What is the cost-effectiveness of OTHER on improving self-perceived performance in daily activities and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) of community-dwelling persons post-stroke, 26 weeks after start compared to usual OT? (quantitative approach)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable stroke
Started Mar 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable stroke
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 13, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2026
CompletedSeptember 10, 2025
September 1, 2025
2.8 years
March 30, 2023
September 4, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes in Canadian Occupational Performance measure (COPM-p) at three time points
The primary outcome measure is 'perceived daily performance' 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after the start of OTHER compared to baseline functioning, measured with the Canadian Occupational Performance measure. The COPM results in a performance score (COPM-p). The COPM is a person-centred, occupation-focused outcome measure for the detection of change in perceived daily performance over time. The COPM results in a performance score (COPM-p) and a satisfaction score (COPM-s). Through a semi-structured interview, persons will prioritize up to five daily activities that deemed most important and rate each on a 10-point scale regarding perceived performance (COPM-p) (1=not able to do at all and 10 = able to do extremely well. The mean COPM-p will be obtained by summing the ratings and dividing them by the number of prioritized activities.
The investigators assess the changes across three time points (one, three and six months)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Changes in Canadian Occupational Performance measure (COPM-s)
baseline, 4 weeks after discharge GR, 12 weeks after discharge GR and 24 weeks after discharge GR
Self-management
baseline, 4 weeks after discharge GR, 12 weeks after discharge GR and 24 weeks after discharge GR
Patient's quality of life.
baseline,4 weeks after discharge GR, 12 weeks after discharge GR and 24 weeks after discharge GR
Capability of older people
baseline,4 weeks after discharge GR, 12 weeks after discharge GR and 24 weeks after discharge GR
Activity level
up to 15 weeks
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (3)
Sociodemographic characteristics
baseline
Chronic conditions
baseline and 24 weeks after discharge GR
Cognitive functioning
baseline and 24 weeks after discharge GR
Study Arms (2)
Care as usual
NO INTERVENTIONCare as usual, consist of GR rehabilitation when a patient is back at home.
OTHER-intervention
EXPERIMENTALThe OTHER-intervention is part of the OT care. Start during inpatient GR rehabilitation and goes on 12 weeks after discharge when a patient is home or starts after discharge from hospital going home. The OT will coach a patient and use a activity monitoring system. Also videoconferencing will be used.
Interventions
The occupational therapist will use activity monitoring and coaching techniques with videoconference during OTHER.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- be able to walk a few steps with or without a walking device.
- years or older
- an assessment score of at least 16 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
- an indication for follow up GR at home
You may not qualify if:
- Who are terminally ill
- Who have severe aphasia; problems with understanding.
- Who has been assessed legally incapable by a geriatric doctor
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (9)
Behandelcentrum SZR
Tiel, Gelderland, 4003 CA, Netherlands
ZZG Herstelcentrum
Groesbeek, Gerlderland, 6561 LE, Netherlands
Cicero Zorggroep
Brunssum, Limburg, 6441 CR, Netherlands
Sevagram
Heerlen, Limburg, 6419 PB, Netherlands
TanteLouise
Bergen op Zoom, North Brabant, 4613 AK, Netherlands
Hogeschool van Amsterdam
Amsterdam-Zuidoost, North Holland, 1105 BD, Netherlands
GRZ Plus (2 locations, Omring and Zorgcirkel)
Hoorn, North Holland, 1624 AB, Netherlands
Vivium Naardenheem
Naarden, North Holland, 1411 HB, Netherlands
AxionContinu
Utrecht, Utrecht, 3526KJ, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Margo van Hartingsveldt, Dr.
Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MSc. of Health Science - Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 30, 2023
First Posted
May 11, 2023
Study Start
March 13, 2023
Primary Completion
January 1, 2026
Study Completion
January 1, 2026
Last Updated
September 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share