NCT05855226

Brief Summary

The goal of this (cost)effectiveness study is to compare care as usual with OTHER-intervention in Cerebro Vascular Accident (CVA) older adults in Geriatric Rehabilitation (GR). The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:

  1. 1.What is the effectiveness of OTHER, as compared to occupational therapy as usual (CAU), on improving the self-perceived performance in daily activities of community-dwelling older persons post-stroke over a 24-week period after initiation of OTHER or CAU, as measured longitudinally (at week 4, 13 and 26)?
  2. 2.What is the effectiveness of OTHER on improving satisfaction with the perceived daily performance of community-dwelling persons post-stroke, 26 weeks after start compared to usual OT? (quantitative approach)
  3. 3.What is the effectiveness of OTHER on improving physical activity of community-dwelling persons post-stroke, 26 weeks after start compared to usual OT? (quantitative approach)
  4. 4.What is the effectiveness of OTHER on improving self-management of community-dwelling persons post-stroke, 26 weeks after start compared to usual OT? (quantitative approach)
  5. 5.How do persons post-stroke and OT's experience and how do they reflect on OTHER in supporting a sense of self-management, safety and improving daily functioning? (qualitative approach).
  6. 6.What factors influenced the intervention delivery and the perceived benefits in the OTHER study (process evaluation)? 1) monitoring treatment fidelity, barriers and facilitators for implementation; 2) gain insight into the impact of OTHER on the GR transition to home; 3) to gain insight into what stroke survivors and OT's think of OTHER. 4) how participants, and professionals experience and thoughts they have on the OTHER-intervention in supporting daily functioning and self-management
  7. 7.What is the cost-effectiveness of OTHER on improving self-perceived performance in daily activities and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) of community-dwelling persons post-stroke, 26 weeks after start compared to usual OT? (quantitative approach)

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
171

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

9 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 13, 2023

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 30, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 11, 2023

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

September 10, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

March 30, 2023

Last Update Submit

September 4, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in Canadian Occupational Performance measure (COPM-p) at three time points

    The primary outcome measure is 'perceived daily performance' 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after the start of OTHER compared to baseline functioning, measured with the Canadian Occupational Performance measure. The COPM results in a performance score (COPM-p). The COPM is a person-centred, occupation-focused outcome measure for the detection of change in perceived daily performance over time. The COPM results in a performance score (COPM-p) and a satisfaction score (COPM-s). Through a semi-structured interview, persons will prioritize up to five daily activities that deemed most important and rate each on a 10-point scale regarding perceived performance (COPM-p) (1=not able to do at all and 10 = able to do extremely well. The mean COPM-p will be obtained by summing the ratings and dividing them by the number of prioritized activities.

    The investigators assess the changes across three time points (one, three and six months)

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Changes in Canadian Occupational Performance measure (COPM-s)

    baseline, 4 weeks after discharge GR, 12 weeks after discharge GR and 24 weeks after discharge GR

  • Self-management

    baseline, 4 weeks after discharge GR, 12 weeks after discharge GR and 24 weeks after discharge GR

  • Patient's quality of life.

    baseline,4 weeks after discharge GR, 12 weeks after discharge GR and 24 weeks after discharge GR

  • Capability of older people

    baseline,4 weeks after discharge GR, 12 weeks after discharge GR and 24 weeks after discharge GR

  • Activity level

    up to 15 weeks

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Sociodemographic characteristics

    baseline

  • Chronic conditions

    baseline and 24 weeks after discharge GR

  • Cognitive functioning

    baseline and 24 weeks after discharge GR

Study Arms (2)

Care as usual

NO INTERVENTION

Care as usual, consist of GR rehabilitation when a patient is back at home.

OTHER-intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

The OTHER-intervention is part of the OT care. Start during inpatient GR rehabilitation and goes on 12 weeks after discharge when a patient is home or starts after discharge from hospital going home. The OT will coach a patient and use a activity monitoring system. Also videoconferencing will be used.

Other: OTHER-intervention (Occupational Therapy at Home E-Rehabilitation)

Interventions

The occupational therapist will use activity monitoring and coaching techniques with videoconference during OTHER.

OTHER-intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • be able to walk a few steps with or without a walking device.
  • years or older
  • an assessment score of at least 16 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
  • an indication for follow up GR at home

You may not qualify if:

  • Who are terminally ill
  • Who have severe aphasia; problems with understanding.
  • Who has been assessed legally incapable by a geriatric doctor

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (9)

Behandelcentrum SZR

Tiel, Gelderland, 4003 CA, Netherlands

RECRUITING

ZZG Herstelcentrum

Groesbeek, Gerlderland, 6561 LE, Netherlands

RECRUITING

Cicero Zorggroep

Brunssum, Limburg, 6441 CR, Netherlands

RECRUITING

Sevagram

Heerlen, Limburg, 6419 PB, Netherlands

RECRUITING

TanteLouise

Bergen op Zoom, North Brabant, 4613 AK, Netherlands

RECRUITING

Hogeschool van Amsterdam

Amsterdam-Zuidoost, North Holland, 1105 BD, Netherlands

RECRUITING

GRZ Plus (2 locations, Omring and Zorgcirkel)

Hoorn, North Holland, 1624 AB, Netherlands

RECRUITING

Vivium Naardenheem

Naarden, North Holland, 1411 HB, Netherlands

RECRUITING

AxionContinu

Utrecht, Utrecht, 3526KJ, Netherlands

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Margo van Hartingsveldt, Dr.

    Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Sanne Pellegrom, MSc.

CONTACT

Margriet Pol, Dr

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MSc. of Health Science - Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2023

First Posted

May 11, 2023

Study Start

March 13, 2023

Primary Completion

January 1, 2026

Study Completion

January 1, 2026

Last Updated

September 10, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations