Impact of Susceptibility to Placebo on the Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Fibromyalgia
FIBROTEC
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Fibromyalgia (FM) is a syndrome characterized by generalized musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, non-restorative sleep, cognitive changes, depressive and neurovegetative symptoms. It is known that conventional pharmacological therapies produce responses with little clinical impact in more than 50% of patients. Functional alterations of the motor cortex and its connections with subcortical structures have also been demonstrated in FM. Based on the above, the objective of this research is to identify subgroups of patients with greater potential for responsiveness to treatment with a view to advancing diagnosis and treatment. In this study, the therapeutic target will be transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) according to the potential of responsiveness to the placebo effect, with the precise location of the stimulation area by a neuronavigation system, with the objective of counter-regulating the dysfunctional processes responsible for triggering and maintaining FM symptoms. Therefore, this clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy of anodal tDCS applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) compared to simulated tDCS in FM, according to susceptibility to placebo effect and serum endorphin levels.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 16, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 25, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 26, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 6, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 20, 2024
CompletedJanuary 8, 2026
January 1, 2026
1.6 years
April 26, 2023
January 7, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
1.Change in pain level - first phase
Change from before and after the First phase of treatment on Pain scores assessed by a Numerical Pain Scale (NPS 0 to 10) (0 means no pain - 10 means the worst pain imaginable)
Time Frame: 1 month
Change in functional capacity - first phase
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) rapidly assesses the severity of pain and its impact on functioning
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change in pain level - second phase
3 months
Change in functional capacity - second phase
3 months
Change in Function of modulatory descending system
1 month
Change in Function of corticospinal pathway
Time Frame: 1 month
7. Change in levels of Brain derived neurotrophic factor - BDNF
Time Frame: 1 month
Study Arms (2)
Respondres placebo effect
PLACEBO COMPARATORIntervention: 'Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS * The patients will receive tDCS stimulation treatment prefrontal cortex dorso lateral * According to 10-20 EEG system, anode will be placed at left F3 and cathode at contralateral F4. * Placebo stimulation uses a 2 milliamperes current during in the first minutes, in the 10 min and in 19 minutes.
No respondres placebo effect
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntervention: 'Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS * The patients will receive tDCS stimulation treatment prefrontal cortex dorso lateral * According to 10-20 EEG system, anode will be placed at left F3 and cathode at contralateral F4. * Active stimulation uses a 2 milliamperes current during 20 minutes.
Interventions
\- Intervention: tDCS is a therapeutic method that modulates the membrane potential, where anodic stimuli induce cortical excitability and cathodic stimuli reduce it
\- Intervention: tDCS is a therapeutic method that modulates the membrane potential, where anodic stimuli induce cortical excitability and cathodic stimuli reduce it
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women aged 18 to 65 years; who can read and write, with a confirmed diagnosis of FM according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria (2010-2016). Pain score equal to or greater than six on the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS 0-10) on most days of the last 3 months.
You may not qualify if:
- Residing outside the greater Porto Alegre area and pregnancy. Contraindications to TMS and tDCS: metallic implant in the brain; medical devices implanted in the brain, cardiac pacemakers; cochlear implant; history of alcohol or drug abuse in the last 6 months; neurological pathologies; hx of head trauma or neurosurgery; decompensated systemic diseases and chronic inflammatory diseases (lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Reiter's syndrome); uncompensated hypothyroidism; personal history of cancer, past or undergoing treatment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90.450-120, Brazil
Related Publications (4)
Clauw DJ, Arnold LM, McCarberg BH; FibroCollaborative. The science of fibromyalgia. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 Sep;86(9):907-11. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2011.0206.
PMID: 21878603BACKGROUNDKeeser D, Meindl T, Bor J, Palm U, Pogarell O, Mulert C, Brunelin J, Moller HJ, Reiser M, Padberg F. Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation changes connectivity of resting-state networks during fMRI. J Neurosci. 2011 Oct 26;31(43):15284-93. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0542-11.2011.
PMID: 22031874BACKGROUNDZanette SA, Dussan-Sarria JA, Souza A, Deitos A, Torres IL, Caumo W. Higher serum S100B and BDNF levels are correlated with a lower pressure-pain threshold in fibromyalgia. Mol Pain. 2014 Jul 8;10:46. doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-10-46.
PMID: 25005881BACKGROUNDCaumo W, Franca BR, Orzechowski R, Bueno G, Franca de Souza A, Dos Santos da Silva JV, Sanches PRS, Da Silva DP Jr, Torres ILS, Hirakata VN, Pacheco-Barrios K, Fregni F. Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation vs Placebo for Fibromyalgia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2514262. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.14262.
PMID: 40478572DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Wolnei Caumo, PhD
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The researcher will receive equipment already programmed by a research assistant, so the researcher who will deliver the tDCS to perform stimulation will not know the programed stimulation. Patients will be instructed to discuss aspects of treatment with the respective investigator. Two independent evaluators who will not participate in the consultations where guidance on the use of tDCS will be provided will be trained to make outcome assessments in follow-up. Patients will not be aware of the type of intervention received, since the sham condition produces a stimulus, but no expected effects. In order to study the level of the blinding, at each moment of evaluation, the patient will be asked about the type of intervention that he / she believes to have received (active or simulated), and about the degree of safety in the response, using a standardized questionnaire. The blinding will be evaluated at the end of each treatment week by means of a standardized instrument.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 26, 2023
First Posted
May 6, 2023
Study Start
September 16, 2021
Primary Completion
April 25, 2023
Study Completion
June 20, 2024
Last Updated
January 8, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share