NCT05845528

Brief Summary

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a syndrome characterized by generalized musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, non-restorative sleep, cognitive changes, depressive and neurovegetative symptoms. It is known that conventional pharmacological therapies produce responses with little clinical impact in more than 50% of patients. Functional alterations of the motor cortex and its connections with subcortical structures have also been demonstrated in FM. Based on the above, the objective of this research is to identify subgroups of patients with greater potential for responsiveness to treatment with a view to advancing diagnosis and treatment. In this study, the therapeutic target will be transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) according to the potential of responsiveness to the placebo effect, with the precise location of the stimulation area by a neuronavigation system, with the objective of counter-regulating the dysfunctional processes responsible for triggering and maintaining FM symptoms. Therefore, this clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy of anodal tDCS applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) compared to simulated tDCS in FM, according to susceptibility to placebo effect and serum endorphin levels.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2021

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 16, 2021

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 25, 2023

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 26, 2023

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 6, 2023

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 20, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

January 8, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

April 26, 2023

Last Update Submit

January 7, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

FibromyalgiatDCSplacebo effectpainb-endorphin

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • 1.Change in pain level - first phase

    Change from before and after the First phase of treatment on Pain scores assessed by a Numerical Pain Scale (NPS 0 to 10) (0 means no pain - 10 means the worst pain imaginable)

    Time Frame: 1 month

  • Change in functional capacity - first phase

    The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) rapidly assesses the severity of pain and its impact on functioning

    1 month

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Change in pain level - second phase

    3 months

  • Change in functional capacity - second phase

    3 months

  • Change in Function of modulatory descending system

    1 month

  • Change in Function of corticospinal pathway

    Time Frame: 1 month

  • 7. Change in levels of Brain derived neurotrophic factor - BDNF

    Time Frame: 1 month

Study Arms (2)

Respondres placebo effect

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Intervention: 'Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS * The patients will receive tDCS stimulation treatment prefrontal cortex dorso lateral * According to 10-20 EEG system, anode will be placed at left F3 and cathode at contralateral F4. * Placebo stimulation uses a 2 milliamperes current during in the first minutes, in the 10 min and in 19 minutes.

Device: s-tDCSDevice: a- tDCS

No respondres placebo effect

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Intervention: 'Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS * The patients will receive tDCS stimulation treatment prefrontal cortex dorso lateral * According to 10-20 EEG system, anode will be placed at left F3 and cathode at contralateral F4. * Active stimulation uses a 2 milliamperes current during 20 minutes.

Device: s-tDCSDevice: a- tDCS

Interventions

s-tDCSDEVICE

\- Intervention: tDCS is a therapeutic method that modulates the membrane potential, where anodic stimuli induce cortical excitability and cathodic stimuli reduce it

No respondres placebo effectRespondres placebo effect
a- tDCSDEVICE

\- Intervention: tDCS is a therapeutic method that modulates the membrane potential, where anodic stimuli induce cortical excitability and cathodic stimuli reduce it

No respondres placebo effectRespondres placebo effect

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Women aged 18 to 65 years; who can read and write, with a confirmed diagnosis of FM according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria (2010-2016). Pain score equal to or greater than six on the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS 0-10) on most days of the last 3 months.

You may not qualify if:

  • Residing outside the greater Porto Alegre area and pregnancy. Contraindications to TMS and tDCS: metallic implant in the brain; medical devices implanted in the brain, cardiac pacemakers; cochlear implant; history of alcohol or drug abuse in the last 6 months; neurological pathologies; hx of head trauma or neurosurgery; decompensated systemic diseases and chronic inflammatory diseases (lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Reiter's syndrome); uncompensated hypothyroidism; personal history of cancer, past or undergoing treatment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90.450-120, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Clauw DJ, Arnold LM, McCarberg BH; FibroCollaborative. The science of fibromyalgia. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 Sep;86(9):907-11. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2011.0206.

    PMID: 21878603BACKGROUND
  • Keeser D, Meindl T, Bor J, Palm U, Pogarell O, Mulert C, Brunelin J, Moller HJ, Reiser M, Padberg F. Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation changes connectivity of resting-state networks during fMRI. J Neurosci. 2011 Oct 26;31(43):15284-93. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0542-11.2011.

    PMID: 22031874BACKGROUND
  • Zanette SA, Dussan-Sarria JA, Souza A, Deitos A, Torres IL, Caumo W. Higher serum S100B and BDNF levels are correlated with a lower pressure-pain threshold in fibromyalgia. Mol Pain. 2014 Jul 8;10:46. doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-10-46.

    PMID: 25005881BACKGROUND
  • Caumo W, Franca BR, Orzechowski R, Bueno G, Franca de Souza A, Dos Santos da Silva JV, Sanches PRS, Da Silva DP Jr, Torres ILS, Hirakata VN, Pacheco-Barrios K, Fregni F. Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation vs Placebo for Fibromyalgia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2514262. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.14262.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

FibromyalgiaPain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Wolnei Caumo, PhD

    Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The researcher will receive equipment already programmed by a research assistant, so the researcher who will deliver the tDCS to perform stimulation will not know the programed stimulation. Patients will be instructed to discuss aspects of treatment with the respective investigator. Two independent evaluators who will not participate in the consultations where guidance on the use of tDCS will be provided will be trained to make outcome assessments in follow-up. Patients will not be aware of the type of intervention received, since the sham condition produces a stimulus, but no expected effects. In order to study the level of the blinding, at each moment of evaluation, the patient will be asked about the type of intervention that he / she believes to have received (active or simulated), and about the degree of safety in the response, using a standardized questionnaire. The blinding will be evaluated at the end of each treatment week by means of a standardized instrument.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel Group, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2023

First Posted

May 6, 2023

Study Start

September 16, 2021

Primary Completion

April 25, 2023

Study Completion

June 20, 2024

Last Updated

January 8, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations