Arthroscopic Assisted CC Stabilization Alone VS Additional K-wire Fixation for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Injury
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This RCT study is designed for comparing functional outcomes and radioligic outcomes between intervention group (Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilzation with additional K-wire fixation) and control group (Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilzation alone) for acute ACJI. The main question it aims to answer is: \- Does Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization with additional K-wire fixation provide different outcomes in functional outcomes, CC-distance and GACA difference compare with arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization alone in acute acromioclavicular joint injury?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 16, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 6, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2024
CompletedOctober 26, 2024
October 1, 2024
7 months
February 16, 2023
October 23, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Acromioclavicular Joint Instability (ACJI) score
Functional outcome, Rated from 0-100, higher score means better function of the shoulder
1 year post-operative
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Coracoclavicular (CC) distance diference
Postoperative day 1, 2weeks postop, 6weeks postop, 3months postop, 6 months postop, 1 year postop
Gleno-acromio-clavicular angle (GACA) difference
3months postop, 6 months postop, 1 year postop
Constant score
3months postop, 6 months postop, 1 year postop
DASH score
3months postop, 6 months postop, 1 year postop
VAS
3months postop, 6 months postop, 1 year postop
Study Arms (2)
With K-wire
EXPERIMENTALarthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization with K-wire
No K-wire
NO INTERVENTIONarthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization
Interventions
K-wire No. 2.0 insertion was done additionally from arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization by inserting K-wire from acromion process to distal clavicle.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-45 years old
- Acute AC joint injury rockwood classification III, IV and V
You may not qualify if:
- History of underwent previous ipsilateral shoulder surgery
- Specific active associated ipsilateral injury (Rib fractures, clavicel fractures, scapula fractures and base of coracoid fractures)
- Onset of injury more than 3 weeks
- Cannot underwent arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital
Chon Buri, 20110, Thailand
Related Publications (18)
Frank RM, Cotter EJ, Leroux TS, Romeo AA. Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries: Evidence-based Treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019 Sep 1;27(17):e775-e788. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00105.
PMID: 31008872BACKGROUNDGoldenberg MM. Analysis of the inhibitory innervation of the isolated gerbil colon. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1968 Oct;175(2):347-64. No abstract available.
PMID: 5702953BACKGROUNDBeitzel K, Mazzocca AD, Bak K, Itoi E, Kibler WB, Mirzayan R, Imhoff AB, Calvo E, Arce G, Shea K; Upper Extremity Committee of ISAKOS. ISAKOS upper extremity committee consensus statement on the need for diversification of the Rockwood classification for acromioclavicular joint injuries. Arthroscopy. 2014 Feb;30(2):271-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.11.005.
PMID: 24485119BACKGROUNDNolte PC, Lacheta L, Dekker TJ, Elrick BP, Millett PJ. Optimal Management of Acromioclavicular Dislocation: Current Perspectives. Orthop Res Rev. 2020 Mar 5;12:27-44. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S218991. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32184680BACKGROUNDAliberti GM, Kraeutler MJ, Trojan JD, Mulcahey MK. Horizontal Instability of the Acromioclavicular Joint: A Systematic Review. Am J Sports Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):504-510. doi: 10.1177/0363546519831013. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
PMID: 31013137BACKGROUNDCisneros LN, Reiriz JS. Prevalence of remaining horizontal instability in high-grade acromioclavicular joint injuries surgically managed. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 Apr;27(3):323-333. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1898-0. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
PMID: 28054147BACKGROUNDShin SJ, Kim NK. Complications after arthroscopic coracoclavicular reconstruction using a single adjustable-loop-length suspensory fixation device in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Arthroscopy. 2015 May;31(5):816-24. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.11.013. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
PMID: 25543250BACKGROUNDTauber M, Koller H, Hitzl W, Resch H. Dynamic radiologic evaluation of horizontal instability in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jun;38(6):1188-95. doi: 10.1177/0363546510361951. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
PMID: 20360606BACKGROUNDMinkus M, Hann C, Scheibel M, Kraus N. Quantification of dynamic posterior translation in modified bilateral Alexander views and correlation with clinical and radiological parameters in patients with acute acromioclavicular joint instability. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Jun;137(6):845-852. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2691-1. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
PMID: 28417201BACKGROUNDCano-Martinez JA, Nicolas-Serrano G, Bento-Gerard J, Picazo-Marin F, Andres-Grau J. Acute high-grade acromioclavicular dislocations treated with triple button device (MINAR): Preliminary results. Injury. 2016 Nov;47(11):2512-2519. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.09.029. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
PMID: 27663286BACKGROUNDScheibel M, Droschel S, Gerhardt C, Kraus N. Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations. Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jul;39(7):1507-16. doi: 10.1177/0363546511399379. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
PMID: 21436458BACKGROUNDSumanont S, Nopamassiri S, Boonrod A, Apiwatanakul P, Boonrod A, Phornphutkul C. Acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a Dog Bone button fixation alone versus Dog Bone button fixation augmented with acromioclavicular repair-a finite element analysis study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Aug;28(6):1095-1101. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2186-y. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
PMID: 29557509BACKGROUNDLadermann A, Grosclaude M, Lubbeke A, Christofilopoulos P, Stern R, Rod T, Hoffmeyer P. Acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular cerclage reconstruction for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Apr;20(3):401-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.007.
PMID: 20888260BACKGROUNDCho CH, Kim BS, Kwon DH. Importance of additional temporary pin fixation combined coracoclavicular augmentation using a suture button device for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Jun;136(6):763-70. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2437-5. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
PMID: 26965695BACKGROUNDVrgoc G, Japjec M, Jurina P, Gulan G, Jankovic S, Sebecic B, Staresinic M. Operative treatment of acute acromioclavicular dislocations Rockwood III and V-Comparative study between K-wires combined with FiberTape((R)) vs. TightRope System((R)). Injury. 2015 Nov;46 Suppl 6:S107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.053. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
PMID: 26584732BACKGROUNDDyrna F, Imhoff FB, Haller B, Braun S, Obopilwe E, Apostolakos JM, Morikawa D, Imhoff AB, Mazzocca AD, Beitzel K. Primary Stability of an Acromioclavicular Joint Repair Is Affected by the Type of Additional Reconstruction of the Acromioclavicular Capsule. Am J Sports Med. 2018 Dec;46(14):3471-3479. doi: 10.1177/0363546518807908. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
PMID: 30419178BACKGROUNDCarkci E, Polat AE, Gurpinar T. The frequency of reduction loss after arthroscopic fixation of acute acromioclavicular dislocations using a double-button device, and its effect on clinical and radiological results. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Apr 8;15(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01674-x.
PMID: 32268914BACKGROUNDLadermann A, Denard PJ, Collin P, Cau JBC, Van Rooij F, Piotton S. Early and delayed acromioclavicular joint reconstruction provide equivalent outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Mar;30(3):635-640. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.06.026. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
PMID: 32650071BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nachapong Sithiwichankit, MD
QSMVH
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 16, 2023
First Posted
May 6, 2023
Study Start
April 1, 2024
Primary Completion
October 30, 2024
Study Completion
December 30, 2024
Last Updated
October 26, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10