Anaesthetic Management Guided by COMET Measurements
AIMED COMET
2 other identifiers
interventional
98
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Surgical site infection (SSI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, prolonged hospital stays and healthcare costs. Perioperative low tissue oxygen tension is associated with a high risk of SSI. Standard anaesthetic management guided by continuous monitoring of oxygen delivery with a non-invasive method of measuring mitochondrial oxygenation tension (mitoPO2) using the Cellular Oxygen METabolism (COMET) monitor may benefit the intraoperative oxygenation on the tissue level. This randomised, controlled, single-centre, parallel-arm, patient-blinded trial aims to investigate if standard anaesthetic management guided by mitoPO2 monitoring results in higher tissue oxygen tension including patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery. Anaesthetists in the intervention group strive to a minimum mitoPO2 of 66 mmHg. Patients in the control group receive standard care. The primary outcome is the difference in means of the mean mitoPO2 during surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 22, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 23, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 26, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 26, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 3, 2023
CompletedMay 3, 2023
April 1, 2023
1.2 years
November 23, 2022
April 23, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean mitoPO2 during abdominal surgery over time
Absolute difference between the means of the mean mitoPO2
during surgery
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Surgical site infection
30 days follow-up
MitoPO2 above baseline
during surgery
Exploration analysis of the correlation coefficients between the intraoperative mitoPO2 and the intraoperative monitoring measurement values
during intraoperative anaesthetic procedure
The respective effect per intervention in mitoPO2 after notification in which mitoPO2 aids decision making on anaesthetic management
during intraoperative anaesthetic procedure
Effect when using the COMET in sequentially treated patients in mitoPO2 assessed with a mixed effects model
during surgery
Other Outcomes (3)
MitoPO2 for patients with epidural anaesthesia
during surgery
MitoPO2 for patients per surgical type
during surgery
MitoPO2 below 20 mmHg and 33 mmHg
during surgery
Study Arms (2)
COMET monitoring device
EXPERIMENTALAnaesthetists for patients allocated to the intervention group were asked to strive and maintain the intraoperative mitoPO2 to the individualised preoperative baseline mitoPO2 with a minimum of 66 mmHg
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONPatients allocated to the control group were treated as per anaesthetist preference and followed our institution's conventional care
Interventions
Cellular Oxygen METabolism (COMET) mitochondrial oxygen tension monitoring device
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients are at least 18 years old
- Patients undergo elective open or laparoscopic abdominal surgery with an expected minimal total incision size of 5 cm
- Patients are able and willing to give written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Known photodermatoses of varying pathology and frequency
- Mitochondrial disease
- Porphyria
- Skin lesions on the upper arm which impede measurements
- Hypersensitivity to the active substance or the 5-ALA medicated plaster material
- Emergency surgery
- Reoperation for complications from recent surgery (within last three months)
- Participation in another study with interference with this study
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Rick Hulskeslead
- Photonics Healthcare B.V., Utrecht, The Netherlandscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1105 AZ, Netherlands
Related Publications (2)
Kabon B, Fleischmann E, Treschan T, Taguchi A, Kapral S, Kurz A. Thoracic epidural anesthesia increases tissue oxygenation during major abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg. 2003 Dec;97(6):1812-1817. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000087040.48267.54.
PMID: 14633566RESULTFleischmann E, Kugener A, Kabon B, Kimberger O, Herbst F, Kurz A. Laparoscopic surgery impairs tissue oxygen tension more than open surgery. Br J Surg. 2007 Mar;94(3):362-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5569.
PMID: 17143850RESULT
Related Links
- Reference 1. Network NHS. Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Events
- Reference 4. de Wijs C, et al. MITOCHONDRIAL OXYGENATION DURING CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS: A PILOT STUDY \[abstract\]. Virtual: In: EACTAIC-ICCVA Joint Congress / Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 35 (2021) S1-S21, 2021
- Reference 5. Hilderink B, et al. Mitochondrial oxygen tension in patients after cardiac surgery: preliminary results \[abstract\]. Madrid, Spain: In: European society of intensive medicine LIVES 40, 2022
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Markus W Hollmann, Professor
Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Anaesthesiology
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Stijn W de Jonge, MD
Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- The mitoPO2 in the control group is covered and made invisible to the anaesthetists. During the procedure, the outcome assessor is present to troubleshoot the device when needed and is also not blinded. Patients, surgeons and healthcare professionals during the postoperative period are blinded to the treatment allocation.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Study coordinator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 23, 2022
First Posted
May 3, 2023
Study Start
September 22, 2021
Primary Completion
November 26, 2022
Study Completion
November 26, 2022
Last Updated
May 3, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share