NCT05833802

Brief Summary

The goal of this observational study is to assess the performance of computational medicine technology in predicting patients response to anticancer drugs based on omics data.The main question it aims to answer is test consistency between the computing drug response and the response of real-world clinical trials. Participants will take part in silico.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
25

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 15, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 24, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 27, 2023

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 15, 2024

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 15, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

April 27, 2023

Status Verified

March 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

March 24, 2023

Last Update Submit

April 25, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

in silico clinical trialanti-cancer drug

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • consistency

    To compare the consistency of the tumor response between two cohorts. Tumor response for Patients in traditional clinical trial cohort will be assessed by New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours v1.1. Tumor response for virtual patients in virtual study will be predicted by the trained model.The efficacy prediction model will be trained using 4-5 patients evaluated for tumor response according to New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours v1.1, including at least 2 patients with Complete Response or Partial Response . The training of this model is based on the Damage Assessment of Genomic Mutations algorithm(EBioMedicine. 2021 Jul;69:103446)with the input of patients' genomic data.

    8 weeks after the first administration of the drug for subjects

Study Arms (2)

the virtual cohort

the virtual cohort that enroll in silico clinical trial (ISCT), and will be treated by virtual anti-cancer drug.

Other: virtual anti-cancer drug

the real cohort

the real cohort that enroll in real word study, and will be treated by anti-cancer drug.

Interventions

the virtual anti-cancer drug was formulation generated by computer modeling and artificial intelligence technology

Also known as: anti-cancer drug
the virtual cohort

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

the patients with triple-negative breast cancer will participate in the traditional clinical trials and be treated by anti-cancer drug.

You may qualify if:

  • clinical diagnosis of triple-negative breast cancer
  • The subjects agreed to participate in the traditional clinical trial and signed informed consent.
  • The subjects agreed to participate in the virtual study and signed informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects suffered from other cancer disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Shuhua Zhao

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100142, China

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Olivier M, Asmis R, Hawkins GA, Howard TD, Cox LA. The Need for Multi-Omics Biomarker Signatures in Precision Medicine. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Sep 26;20(19):4781. doi: 10.3390/ijms20194781.

    PMID: 31561483BACKGROUND
  • Yang M, Fan Y, Wu ZY, Gu J, Feng Z, Zhang Q, Han S, Zhang Z, Li X, Hsueh YC, Ni Y, Li X, Li J, Hu M, Li W, Gao H, Yang C, Zhang C, Zhang L, Zhu T, Cheng M, Ji F, Xu J, Cui H, Tan G, Zhang MQ, Liang C, Liu Z, Song YQ, Niu G, Wang K. DAGM: A novel modelling framework to assess the risk of HER2-negative breast cancer based on germline rare coding mutations. EBioMedicine. 2021 Jul;69:103446. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103446. Epub 2021 Jun 19.

    PMID: 34157485BACKGROUND
  • DiMasi JA, Grabowski HG, Hansen RW. Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New estimates of R&D costs. J Health Econ. 2016 May;47:20-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Feb 12.

    PMID: 26928437BACKGROUND

Related Links

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITH DNA

peripheral blood

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Interventions

Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cytological TechniquesClinical Laboratory TechniquesDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisInvestigative TechniquesDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEvaluation Studies as Topic

Study Officials

  • Min Jiang

    Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 24, 2023

First Posted

April 27, 2023

Study Start

February 15, 2023

Primary Completion

May 15, 2024

Study Completion

September 15, 2024

Last Updated

April 27, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations