Cool vs Room-temperature Artificial Tears
Randomized Controlled Study of Cooled Versus Room-Temperature Artificial Tears for Reducing Surface Irritation Following Intravitreal Injection
1 other identifier
interventional
124
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background and Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of cooled versus room temperature artificial tears in reducing post intravitreal injection (IVI) ocular discomfort. Patients and Methods: Patients receiving IVI were randomized to either cooled or room temperature tears intervention groups. Both groups rated their ocular discomfort following IVI before intervention and again after administration of cooled or room temperature tears.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Mar 2022
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 6, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 14, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 27, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 4, 2025
CompletedMarch 4, 2025
February 1, 2025
4 months
March 14, 2023
June 5, 2023
February 24, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Efficacy of Cooled Versus Room Temperature Artificial Tears in Reducing Post Intravitreal Injection Ocular Discomfort as Measured by Pain Scale Survey.
The level of subjectively reported pain scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is minimal pain and 10 is extreme pain
with 72 hours of the intervention
Study Arms (2)
Cooled artificial tear group
EXPERIMENTALStored at 4 degree Celsius
Room temperature artificial tear group
ACTIVE COMPARATORStored at 25 degree Celsius
Interventions
Refresh Plus Preservative-free Lubricant Eye Drops at either 4 or 25 degree Celsius
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients were eligible if they were receiving standard intravitreal injections for their exudative age-related macular degeneration, cystoid macular edema, diabetic macular edema, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion with macular edema, or retinal neovascularization.
You may not qualify if:
- Inability or lack of willingness to participate in the study
- Active ocular infection including infectious uveitis
- First time receiving intravitreal injection
- Those who reported never having ocular discomfort following intravitreal injections on the pre-injection questionnaire
- Less than 18 years of age
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics - Department of Ophthalmology
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
Related Publications (20)
Peyman GA, Lad EM, Moshfeghi DM. Intravitreal injection of therapeutic agents. Retina. 2009 Jul-Aug;29(7):875-912. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181a94f01.
PMID: 19584648BACKGROUNDPatel SN, Gangaputra S, Sternberg P Jr, Kim SJ. Prophylaxis measures for postinjection endophthalmitis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul-Aug;65(4):408-420. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.12.005. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
PMID: 31923477BACKGROUNDGrzybowski A, Kanclerz P, Myers WG. The use of povidone-iodine in ophthalmology. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan;29(1):19-32. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000437.
PMID: 28984794BACKGROUNDSwift W, Bair JA, Chen W, Li M, Lie S, Li D, Yang M, Shatos MA, Hodges RR, Kolko M, Utheim TP, Scott W, Dartt DA. Povidone iodine treatment is deleterious to human ocular surface conjunctival cells in culture. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep 16;5(1):e000545. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000545. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32995498BACKGROUNDSaedon H, Nosek J, Phillips J, Narendran N, Yang YC. Ocular surface effects of repeated application of povidone iodine in patients receiving frequent intravitreal injections. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2017 Dec;36(4):343-346. doi: 10.1080/15569527.2017.1291665. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
PMID: 28166657BACKGROUNDLaude A, Lim JW, Srinagesh V, Tong L. The effect of intravitreal injections on dry eye, and proposed management strategies. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug 16;11:1491-1497. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S136500. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28860698BACKGROUNDDohlman TH, Lertsuwanroj B, D'Amico DJ, Ciralsky JB, Kiss S. Evaluation of signs and symptoms of ocular surface disease after intravitreal injection. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;97(8):e1154-e1156. doi: 10.1111/aos.14146. Epub 2019 Jun 25. No abstract available.
PMID: 31237739BACKGROUNDSegal O, Segal-Trivitz Y, Nemet AY, Cohen P, Geffen N, Mimouni M. Anxiety levels and perceived pain intensity during intravitreal injections. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;94(2):203-4. doi: 10.1111/aos.12802. Epub 2015 Jul 28. No abstract available.
PMID: 26215781BACKGROUNDChaturvedi R, Wannamaker KW, Riviere PJ, Khanani AM, Wykoff CC, Chao DL. Real-World Trends in Intravitreal Injection Practices among American Retina Specialists. Ophthalmol Retina. 2019 Aug;3(8):656-662. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2019.03.023. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
PMID: 31133544BACKGROUNDAvery RL, Bakri SJ, Blumenkranz MS, Brucker AJ, Cunningham ET Jr, D'Amico DJ, Dugel PU, Flynn HW Jr, Freund KB, Haller JA, Jumper JM, Liebmann JM, McCannel CA, Mieler WF, Ta CN, Williams GA. Intravitreal injection technique and monitoring: updated guidelines of an expert panel. Retina. 2014 Dec;34 Suppl 12:S1-S18. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000399.
PMID: 25489719BACKGROUNDKaplan RI, Drinkwater OJ, Lee RH, Chod RB, Barash A, Giovinazzo JV, Gologorsky D, Jansen ME, Rosen RB, Gentile RC. Pain Control after Intravitreal Injection Using Topical Nepafenac 0.3% or Pressure Patching: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Ophthalmol Retina. 2019 Oct;3(10):860-866. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2019.04.022. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
PMID: 31221565BACKGROUNDRifkin L, Schaal S. Shortening ocular pain duration following intravitreal injections. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012 Nov-Dec;22(6):1008-12. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000147. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
PMID: 22562296BACKGROUNDGaynes BI, Fiscella R. Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for ophthalmic use: a safety review. Drug Saf. 2002;25(4):233-50. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200225040-00002.
PMID: 11994027BACKGROUNDFujishima H, Yagi Y, Shimazaki J, Tsubota K. Effects of artificial tear temperature on corneal sensation and subjective comfort. Cornea. 1997 Nov;16(6):630-4.
PMID: 9395871BACKGROUNDHu Youwei J, Chang B. Effect of cooling proparacaine 0.5% eye drops on patient's comfort during instillation. Eye (Lond). 2015 Aug;29(8):1112-3. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.59. Epub 2015 Apr 24. No abstract available.
PMID: 25907208BACKGROUNDRamos MS, Xu LT, Singuri S, Castillo Tafur JC, Arepalli S, Ehlers JP, Kaiser PK, Singh RP, Rachitskaya AV, Srivastava SK, Sears JE, Schachat AP, Babiuch AS, Sharma S, Martin DF, Lowder CY, Singh AD, Yuan A, Nowacki AS. Patient-Reported Complications after Intravitreal Injection and Their Predictive Factors. Ophthalmol Retina. 2021 Jul;5(7):625-632. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.09.024. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
PMID: 33059077BACKGROUNDMessmer EM. The pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of dry eye disease. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015 Jan 30;112(5):71-81; quiz 82. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0071.
PMID: 25686388BACKGROUNDBitton E, Crncich V, Brunet N. Does the temperature of an artificial tear affect its comfort? Clin Exp Optom. 2018 Sep;101(5):641-647. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12664. Epub 2018 Feb 18.
PMID: 29457271BACKGROUNDPucker AD, Ng SM, Nichols JJ. Over the counter (OTC) artificial tear drops for dry eye syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 23;2:CD009729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009729.pub2.
PMID: 26905373BACKGROUNDWalsh K, Jones L. The use of preservatives in dry eye drops. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug 1;13:1409-1425. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S211611. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31447543BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Douglas Jin, MD
- Organization
- University of Iowa
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Douglas Jin, MD
University of Iowa
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 14, 2023
First Posted
April 27, 2023
Study Start
March 1, 2022
Primary Completion
July 1, 2022
Study Completion
July 6, 2022
Last Updated
March 4, 2025
Results First Posted
March 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02