NCT05832996

Brief Summary

Background and Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of cooled versus room temperature artificial tears in reducing post intravitreal injection (IVI) ocular discomfort. Patients and Methods: Patients receiving IVI were randomized to either cooled or room temperature tears intervention groups. Both groups rated their ocular discomfort following IVI before intervention and again after administration of cooled or room temperature tears.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
124

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2022

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2022

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 6, 2022

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 14, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 27, 2023

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 4, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 4, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

March 14, 2023

Results QC Date

June 5, 2023

Last Update Submit

February 24, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The Efficacy of Cooled Versus Room Temperature Artificial Tears in Reducing Post Intravitreal Injection Ocular Discomfort as Measured by Pain Scale Survey.

    The level of subjectively reported pain scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is minimal pain and 10 is extreme pain

    with 72 hours of the intervention

Study Arms (2)

Cooled artificial tear group

EXPERIMENTAL

Stored at 4 degree Celsius

Drug: Refresh Plus Preservative-free Lubricant Eye Drops

Room temperature artificial tear group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Stored at 25 degree Celsius

Drug: Refresh Plus Preservative-free Lubricant Eye Drops

Interventions

Refresh Plus Preservative-free Lubricant Eye Drops at either 4 or 25 degree Celsius

Cooled artificial tear groupRoom temperature artificial tear group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 105 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients were eligible if they were receiving standard intravitreal injections for their exudative age-related macular degeneration, cystoid macular edema, diabetic macular edema, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion with macular edema, or retinal neovascularization.

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability or lack of willingness to participate in the study
  • Active ocular infection including infectious uveitis
  • First time receiving intravitreal injection
  • Those who reported never having ocular discomfort following intravitreal injections on the pre-injection questionnaire
  • Less than 18 years of age

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics - Department of Ophthalmology

Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States

Location

Related Publications (20)

  • Peyman GA, Lad EM, Moshfeghi DM. Intravitreal injection of therapeutic agents. Retina. 2009 Jul-Aug;29(7):875-912. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181a94f01.

    PMID: 19584648BACKGROUND
  • Patel SN, Gangaputra S, Sternberg P Jr, Kim SJ. Prophylaxis measures for postinjection endophthalmitis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul-Aug;65(4):408-420. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.12.005. Epub 2020 Jan 7.

    PMID: 31923477BACKGROUND
  • Grzybowski A, Kanclerz P, Myers WG. The use of povidone-iodine in ophthalmology. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan;29(1):19-32. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000437.

    PMID: 28984794BACKGROUND
  • Swift W, Bair JA, Chen W, Li M, Lie S, Li D, Yang M, Shatos MA, Hodges RR, Kolko M, Utheim TP, Scott W, Dartt DA. Povidone iodine treatment is deleterious to human ocular surface conjunctival cells in culture. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep 16;5(1):e000545. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000545. eCollection 2020.

    PMID: 32995498BACKGROUND
  • Saedon H, Nosek J, Phillips J, Narendran N, Yang YC. Ocular surface effects of repeated application of povidone iodine in patients receiving frequent intravitreal injections. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2017 Dec;36(4):343-346. doi: 10.1080/15569527.2017.1291665. Epub 2017 Feb 28.

    PMID: 28166657BACKGROUND
  • Laude A, Lim JW, Srinagesh V, Tong L. The effect of intravitreal injections on dry eye, and proposed management strategies. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug 16;11:1491-1497. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S136500. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 28860698BACKGROUND
  • Dohlman TH, Lertsuwanroj B, D'Amico DJ, Ciralsky JB, Kiss S. Evaluation of signs and symptoms of ocular surface disease after intravitreal injection. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;97(8):e1154-e1156. doi: 10.1111/aos.14146. Epub 2019 Jun 25. No abstract available.

    PMID: 31237739BACKGROUND
  • Segal O, Segal-Trivitz Y, Nemet AY, Cohen P, Geffen N, Mimouni M. Anxiety levels and perceived pain intensity during intravitreal injections. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;94(2):203-4. doi: 10.1111/aos.12802. Epub 2015 Jul 28. No abstract available.

    PMID: 26215781BACKGROUND
  • Chaturvedi R, Wannamaker KW, Riviere PJ, Khanani AM, Wykoff CC, Chao DL. Real-World Trends in Intravitreal Injection Practices among American Retina Specialists. Ophthalmol Retina. 2019 Aug;3(8):656-662. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2019.03.023. Epub 2019 Apr 4.

    PMID: 31133544BACKGROUND
  • Avery RL, Bakri SJ, Blumenkranz MS, Brucker AJ, Cunningham ET Jr, D'Amico DJ, Dugel PU, Flynn HW Jr, Freund KB, Haller JA, Jumper JM, Liebmann JM, McCannel CA, Mieler WF, Ta CN, Williams GA. Intravitreal injection technique and monitoring: updated guidelines of an expert panel. Retina. 2014 Dec;34 Suppl 12:S1-S18. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000399.

    PMID: 25489719BACKGROUND
  • Kaplan RI, Drinkwater OJ, Lee RH, Chod RB, Barash A, Giovinazzo JV, Gologorsky D, Jansen ME, Rosen RB, Gentile RC. Pain Control after Intravitreal Injection Using Topical Nepafenac 0.3% or Pressure Patching: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Ophthalmol Retina. 2019 Oct;3(10):860-866. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2019.04.022. Epub 2019 Apr 26.

    PMID: 31221565BACKGROUND
  • Rifkin L, Schaal S. Shortening ocular pain duration following intravitreal injections. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012 Nov-Dec;22(6):1008-12. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000147. Epub 2012 Apr 24.

    PMID: 22562296BACKGROUND
  • Gaynes BI, Fiscella R. Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for ophthalmic use: a safety review. Drug Saf. 2002;25(4):233-50. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200225040-00002.

    PMID: 11994027BACKGROUND
  • Fujishima H, Yagi Y, Shimazaki J, Tsubota K. Effects of artificial tear temperature on corneal sensation and subjective comfort. Cornea. 1997 Nov;16(6):630-4.

    PMID: 9395871BACKGROUND
  • Hu Youwei J, Chang B. Effect of cooling proparacaine 0.5% eye drops on patient's comfort during instillation. Eye (Lond). 2015 Aug;29(8):1112-3. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.59. Epub 2015 Apr 24. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25907208BACKGROUND
  • Ramos MS, Xu LT, Singuri S, Castillo Tafur JC, Arepalli S, Ehlers JP, Kaiser PK, Singh RP, Rachitskaya AV, Srivastava SK, Sears JE, Schachat AP, Babiuch AS, Sharma S, Martin DF, Lowder CY, Singh AD, Yuan A, Nowacki AS. Patient-Reported Complications after Intravitreal Injection and Their Predictive Factors. Ophthalmol Retina. 2021 Jul;5(7):625-632. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.09.024. Epub 2020 Oct 12.

    PMID: 33059077BACKGROUND
  • Messmer EM. The pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of dry eye disease. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015 Jan 30;112(5):71-81; quiz 82. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0071.

    PMID: 25686388BACKGROUND
  • Bitton E, Crncich V, Brunet N. Does the temperature of an artificial tear affect its comfort? Clin Exp Optom. 2018 Sep;101(5):641-647. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12664. Epub 2018 Feb 18.

    PMID: 29457271BACKGROUND
  • Pucker AD, Ng SM, Nichols JJ. Over the counter (OTC) artificial tear drops for dry eye syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 23;2:CD009729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009729.pub2.

    PMID: 26905373BACKGROUND
  • Walsh K, Jones L. The use of preservatives in dry eye drops. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug 1;13:1409-1425. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S211611. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 31447543BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

DiseaseMacular EdemaEye Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsMacular DegenerationRetinal DegenerationRetinal DiseasesEye DiseasesEye ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPainNeurologic Manifestations

Results Point of Contact

Title
Douglas Jin, MD
Organization
University of Iowa

Study Officials

  • Douglas Jin, MD

    University of Iowa

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 14, 2023

First Posted

April 27, 2023

Study Start

March 1, 2022

Primary Completion

July 1, 2022

Study Completion

July 6, 2022

Last Updated

March 4, 2025

Results First Posted

March 4, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Locations