Method of Securing Skin Graft: A Comparison of Vacuum Assisted Closure Device Versus Bolster Dressing
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the outcomes of vacuum assisted closure device versus conventional bolster dressing in securing split thickness skin graft in traumatic wounds; with emphasis on percentage of graft take and postoperative complications like hematoma, seroma and infection of graft site. Two groups were formed with 70 patients in each group. Patients were randomly allocated either to group A(VAC group) or group B(bolster dressing group) and outcomes were assessed on 5th post-operative day when first dressing change was done
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 21, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 20, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 20, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 14, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 26, 2023
CompletedApril 26, 2023
April 1, 2023
8 months
April 14, 2023
April 14, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Graft take
Defined as the percentage of the skin graft which is adherent to the recipient wound which is wound size. The area for wound size will be pre-operatively measured using ruler in centimeter square and the area where graft is adherent will be measured in percentage. It will be visually assessed by consultant surgeon at the time of first dressing change
5th post-operative day or earlier if excessive soakage of dressing
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Post-operative complications
5th post-operative day or earlier if excessive soakage of dressing
Study Arms (2)
Group A (VAC group)
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor Group A, VAC dressing was placed to secure split thickness skin graft. Two sheets of sterilized VAC sponge that was cut to fit the wound contour were placed with a fenestrated tube between the two layers that was secured to the surrounding skin using tincture of benzoin spray and an adhesive dressing (OPSITE). The VAC was placed to intermittent -125 mmHg suction for 2 hours and then decompressed for next 2 hours.
Group B (Bolster dressing group)
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor Group B, Bolster dressing was done to secure split thickness skin graft. The recipient site was bolstered with wet bulky cotton gauze dressing and wrapped with cotton bandage. 0.9% normal saline was used for moisture.
Interventions
Bolster dressing- Moist bulky cotton gauze dressing and wrapped with cotton bandage. Vacuum assisted closure (VAC) dressing- A fenestrated tube placed between two sheets of sterilized foam secured to the surrounding skin using adhesive dressing (OPSITE).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients undergoing skin graft at the Civil Hospital
- aged 18 years to 60 years
- either gender
- ASA grade 1
- Traumatic wounds of size 25 cm2 to 225 cm2 and of greater than 14 days duration with healthy granulation tissue and
- Consenting to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with signs of wound infection
- Patients with wounds of poor blood supply
- Patients known for allergy or sensitivity to acrylic adhesives.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dow University of Health Sciences
Karachi, 7, Pakistan
Related Publications (7)
Mohsin M, Zargar HR, Wani AH, Zaroo MI, Baba PUF, Bashir SA, Rasool A, Bijli AH. Role of customised negative-pressure wound therapy in the integration of split-thickness skin grafts: A randomised control study. Indian J Plast Surg. 2017 Jan-Apr;50(1):43-49. doi: 10.4103/ijps.IJPS_196_16.
PMID: 28615809BACKGROUNDScherer LA, Shiver S, Chang M, Meredith JW, Owings JT. The vacuum assisted closure device: a method of securing skin grafts and improving graft survival. Arch Surg. 2002 Aug;137(8):930-3; discussion 933-4. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.8.930.
PMID: 12146992BACKGROUNDLee SH, Kim YJ. Effectiveness of double tie-over dressing compared with bolster dressing. Arch Plast Surg. 2018 May;45(3):266-270. doi: 10.5999/aps.2017.01424. Epub 2018 May 15.
PMID: 29788688BACKGROUNDDhillon M, Carter CP, Morrison J, Hislop WS, Currie WJ. A comparison of skin graft success in the head & neck with and without the use of a pressure dressing. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015 Jun;14(2):240-2. doi: 10.1007/s12663-014-0618-8. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
PMID: 26028841BACKGROUNDAzzopardi EA, Boyce DE, Dickson WA, Azzopardi E, Laing JH, Whitaker IS, Shokrollahi K. Application of topical negative pressure (vacuum-assisted closure) to split-thickness skin grafts: a structured evidence-based review. Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Jan;70(1):23-9. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31826eab9e.
PMID: 23249474BACKGROUNDKucharzewski M, Mieszczanski P, Wilemska-Kucharzewska K, Taradaj J, Kuropatnicki A, Sliwinski Z. The application of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of chronic venous leg ulceration: authors experience. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:297230. doi: 10.1155/2014/297230. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
PMID: 24696847BACKGROUNDYadav S, Rawal G, Baxi M. Vacuum assisted closure technique: a short review. Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Nov 21;28:246. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.28.246.9606. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 29881491BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Saira A Chhotani, MBBS
Dow University of Health Sciences
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The dressing is opened by principal investigator and then the supervising consultant is called for outcome assessment.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 14, 2023
First Posted
April 26, 2023
Study Start
October 21, 2021
Primary Completion
June 20, 2022
Study Completion
June 20, 2022
Last Updated
April 26, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
To maintain confidentiality of participants, medical record no. of patients was tagged with other serial number and only principal investigator had and will have an access to original data.