NCT05831020

Brief Summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the outcomes of vacuum assisted closure device versus conventional bolster dressing in securing split thickness skin graft in traumatic wounds; with emphasis on percentage of graft take and postoperative complications like hematoma, seroma and infection of graft site. Two groups were formed with 70 patients in each group. Patients were randomly allocated either to group A(VAC group) or group B(bolster dressing group) and outcomes were assessed on 5th post-operative day when first dressing change was done

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
140

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 21, 2021

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 20, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 20, 2022

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 14, 2023

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 26, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

April 26, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

April 14, 2023

Last Update Submit

April 14, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Graft take, vacuum assisted, Bolster dressing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Graft take

    Defined as the percentage of the skin graft which is adherent to the recipient wound which is wound size. The area for wound size will be pre-operatively measured using ruler in centimeter square and the area where graft is adherent will be measured in percentage. It will be visually assessed by consultant surgeon at the time of first dressing change

    5th post-operative day or earlier if excessive soakage of dressing

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Post-operative complications

    5th post-operative day or earlier if excessive soakage of dressing

Study Arms (2)

Group A (VAC group)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

For Group A, VAC dressing was placed to secure split thickness skin graft. Two sheets of sterilized VAC sponge that was cut to fit the wound contour were placed with a fenestrated tube between the two layers that was secured to the surrounding skin using tincture of benzoin spray and an adhesive dressing (OPSITE). The VAC was placed to intermittent -125 mmHg suction for 2 hours and then decompressed for next 2 hours.

Other: VAC and bolster dressing

Group B (Bolster dressing group)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

For Group B, Bolster dressing was done to secure split thickness skin graft. The recipient site was bolstered with wet bulky cotton gauze dressing and wrapped with cotton bandage. 0.9% normal saline was used for moisture.

Other: VAC and bolster dressing

Interventions

Bolster dressing- Moist bulky cotton gauze dressing and wrapped with cotton bandage. Vacuum assisted closure (VAC) dressing- A fenestrated tube placed between two sheets of sterilized foam secured to the surrounding skin using adhesive dressing (OPSITE).

Group A (VAC group)Group B (Bolster dressing group)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • All patients undergoing skin graft at the Civil Hospital
  • aged 18 years to 60 years
  • either gender
  • ASA grade 1
  • Traumatic wounds of size 25 cm2 to 225 cm2 and of greater than 14 days duration with healthy granulation tissue and
  • Consenting to participate in the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with signs of wound infection
  • Patients with wounds of poor blood supply
  • Patients known for allergy or sensitivity to acrylic adhesives.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dow University of Health Sciences

Karachi, 7, Pakistan

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Mohsin M, Zargar HR, Wani AH, Zaroo MI, Baba PUF, Bashir SA, Rasool A, Bijli AH. Role of customised negative-pressure wound therapy in the integration of split-thickness skin grafts: A randomised control study. Indian J Plast Surg. 2017 Jan-Apr;50(1):43-49. doi: 10.4103/ijps.IJPS_196_16.

    PMID: 28615809BACKGROUND
  • Scherer LA, Shiver S, Chang M, Meredith JW, Owings JT. The vacuum assisted closure device: a method of securing skin grafts and improving graft survival. Arch Surg. 2002 Aug;137(8):930-3; discussion 933-4. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.8.930.

    PMID: 12146992BACKGROUND
  • Lee SH, Kim YJ. Effectiveness of double tie-over dressing compared with bolster dressing. Arch Plast Surg. 2018 May;45(3):266-270. doi: 10.5999/aps.2017.01424. Epub 2018 May 15.

    PMID: 29788688BACKGROUND
  • Dhillon M, Carter CP, Morrison J, Hislop WS, Currie WJ. A comparison of skin graft success in the head & neck with and without the use of a pressure dressing. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015 Jun;14(2):240-2. doi: 10.1007/s12663-014-0618-8. Epub 2014 Feb 11.

    PMID: 26028841BACKGROUND
  • Azzopardi EA, Boyce DE, Dickson WA, Azzopardi E, Laing JH, Whitaker IS, Shokrollahi K. Application of topical negative pressure (vacuum-assisted closure) to split-thickness skin grafts: a structured evidence-based review. Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Jan;70(1):23-9. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31826eab9e.

    PMID: 23249474BACKGROUND
  • Kucharzewski M, Mieszczanski P, Wilemska-Kucharzewska K, Taradaj J, Kuropatnicki A, Sliwinski Z. The application of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of chronic venous leg ulceration: authors experience. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:297230. doi: 10.1155/2014/297230. Epub 2014 Feb 18.

    PMID: 24696847BACKGROUND
  • Yadav S, Rawal G, Baxi M. Vacuum assisted closure technique: a short review. Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Nov 21;28:246. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.28.246.9606. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 29881491BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Saira A Chhotani, MBBS

    Dow University of Health Sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The dressing is opened by principal investigator and then the supervising consultant is called for outcome assessment.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A two arm parallel assignment, where group A will be VAC group and group B will be bolster dressing group.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 14, 2023

First Posted

April 26, 2023

Study Start

October 21, 2021

Primary Completion

June 20, 2022

Study Completion

June 20, 2022

Last Updated

April 26, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

To maintain confidentiality of participants, medical record no. of patients was tagged with other serial number and only principal investigator had and will have an access to original data.

Locations