Effect of Pre-emptive Dose of Prednisone Versus Placebo in Impacted Third Molar Surgery
Three-dimensional Facial Swelling Evaluation of Pre-operative Single-dose of Prednisone in Third Molar Surgery: a Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The present study proposes to compare the effect of a single preoperative dose of prednisone versus placebo in terms of facial swelling, trismus and pain after surgical removal of the mandibular third molar (M3M) in a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Feb 2022
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 25, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 10, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 27, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 26, 2023
CompletedApril 26, 2023
April 1, 2023
9 months
March 27, 2023
April 23, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in facial swelling
To compare the effectiveness of prednisone/os versus placebo in reducing facial swelling using qualitative three-dimensional analysis (measured by colorimetric variation given by the overlapping volumes) .
Change from baseline (before surgery) at 2 day after surgery and at 7 days after surgery
Change in facial swelling
To compare the effectiveness of prednisone/os versus placebo in reducing facial swelling using quantitative three-dimensional analysis (differences are measured in cm3).
Change from baseline (before surgery) at 2 day after surgery and at 7 days after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in trismus
Change from baseline (before surgery) at 2 day after surgery and at 7 days after surgery
Change in pain with Visual analogue scale (VAS)
Change from baseline (before surgery) at 2 day after surgery and at 7 days after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Prednisone group (PG)
EXPERIMENTALPatients receiving a preoperative administration of prednisone 25 mg/os.
Control group (CG)
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients receiving a preoperative administration of Placebo.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 18 to 32 years who required both M3M extractions were recruited
- Good health status
- Indication to surgical extraction of both M3M
- Complete root formation
- Surgical risk level classified as "Conventional" or "Moderate" according to Daugela et al. classification
You may not qualify if:
- Person under the age of 18 or over 32
- Allergy or contraindications to administration of corticosteroids
- Acute infection in any of the teeth to be extracted
- Patients with chronic liver disease, diabetes, immune system dysfunction, or haematological disease
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- History of treatment with antiresorptive drugs
- Chronic kidney disease
- History of systemic corticosteroid therapy in the past 4 weeks
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro
Catanzaro, CZ, 88100, Italy
Related Publications (13)
Cankaya AB, Akcay C, Kahraman N, Koseoglu BG. Oral surgical procedures under local anaesthesia in day surgery. BMC Oral Health. 2018 Oct 30;18(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0648-6.
PMID: 30376855RESULTSifuentes-Cervantes JS, Carrillo-Morales F, Castro-Nunez J, Cunningham LL, Van Sickels JE. Third molar surgery: Past, present, and the future. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2021 Nov;132(5):523-531. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2021.03.004. Epub 2021 Mar 14.
PMID: 34030996RESULTSainz de Baranda B, Silvestre FJ, Silvestre-Rangil J. Relationship Between Surgical Difficulty of Third Molar Extraction Under Local Anesthesia and the Postoperative Evolution of Clinical and Blood Parameters. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jul;77(7):1337-1345. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.02.020. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
PMID: 30878593RESULTYamalik K, Bozkaya S. The predictivity of mandibular third molar position as a risk indicator for pericoronitis. Clin Oral Investig. 2008 Mar;12(1):9-14. doi: 10.1007/s00784-007-0131-2. Epub 2007 Jul 10.
PMID: 17619915RESULTYoo JH, Yeom HG, Shin W, Yun JP, Lee JH, Jeong SH, Lim HJ, Lee J, Kim BC. Deep learning based prediction of extraction difficulty for mandibular third molars. Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 21;11(1):1954. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81449-4.
PMID: 33479379RESULTAcham S, Klampfl A, Truschnegg A, Kirmeier R, Sandner-Kiesling A, Jakse N. Beneficial effect of methylprednisolone after mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled split-mouth trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Sep;17(7):1693-700. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0867-1. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
PMID: 23108628RESULTHerrera-Briones FJ, Prados Sanchez E, Reyes Botella C, Vallecillo Capilla M. Update on the use of corticosteroids in third molar surgery: systematic review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Nov;116(5):e342-51. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.02.027. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
PMID: 22902498RESULTNgeow WC, Lim D. Do Corticosteroids Still Have a Role in the Management of Third Molar Surgery? Adv Ther. 2016 Jul;33(7):1105-39. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0357-y. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
PMID: 27287853RESULTTiigimae-Saar J, Leibur E, Tamme T. The effect of prednisolone on reduction of complaints after impacted third molar removal. Stomatologija. 2010;12(1):17-22.
PMID: 20440092RESULTKaewkumnert S, Phithaksinsuk K, Changpoo C, Nochit N, Muensaiyat Y, Wilaipornsawai S, Piriyaphokai U, Powcharoen W. Comparison of intraosseous and submucosal dexamethasone injection in mandibular third molar surgery: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Apr;49(4):529-535. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.10.006. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
PMID: 31668666RESULTJuodzbalys G, Daugela P. Mandibular third molar impaction: review of literature and a proposal of a classification. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2013 Jul 1;4(2):e1. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2013.4201.
PMID: 24422029RESULTLau AAL, De Silva RK, Thomson M, De Silva H, Tong D. Third Molar Surgery Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Submucosal and Intravenous Dexamethasone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Feb;79(2):295-304. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.09.020. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
PMID: 33058774RESULTAntonelli A, Barone S, Bennardo F, Giudice A. Three-dimensional facial swelling evaluation of pre-operative single-dose of prednisone in third molar surgery: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial. BMC Oral Health. 2023 Aug 31;23(1):614. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03334-y.
PMID: 37653378DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alessandro Antonelli, PhDs, DDS
Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 27, 2023
First Posted
April 26, 2023
Study Start
February 1, 2022
Primary Completion
October 25, 2022
Study Completion
December 10, 2022
Last Updated
April 26, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share