NCT05828160

Brief Summary

This study aims to develop and validate the Italian version of the Motricity Index (MI-Italian), through the following steps:

  • translation of the MI into Italian, by using the forward-backward translation approach, to produce a pre-final MI-Italian
  • pre-pilot testing of the pre-final MI-Italian in a sample of ten health professionals (physicians and physiotherapists), who will be asked to judge the clarity of each item of the MI, including scoring instructions, to produce a final MI-Italian
  • evaluation of the metric properties (internal consistency, inter- and intra-rater reliability, validity and responsiveness) of the final MI-Italian in a sample of subjects admitted to the Don Gnocchi Foundation in Florence for rehabilitation after stroke.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
115

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2023

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 3, 2023

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 25, 2023

Completed
20 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 15, 2023

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 15, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 15, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

April 25, 2023

Status Verified

January 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

February 3, 2023

Last Update Submit

April 13, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (15)

  • Internal Consistency - Baseline assessment

    Cronbach's alpha

    Assessment at admission (T0),

  • Internal Consistency - Discharge assessment

    Cronbach's alpha

    Discharge (T1) assessment. Time of discharge will vary among participants, so a definite time point cannot be stated. On average, discharge is expected after 30 days from admission.

  • Intra-rater reliability

    One-way random-effects model sIngle measures Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC1,1)

    Test and Retest assessments, conducted 1-3 days apart.

  • Inter-rater reliability

    One-way random-effects model sIngle measures Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC1,1)

    Admission assessment conducted independently by two raters 30-60 minutes apart.

  • Intra-rater reliability (error of measurement)

    Standard Error of the Measurements (SEM), computed as the standard deviation of the two measures collected by the same rater, multiplied by the square root of 1 minus ICC.

    Test and Retest assessments, conducted 1-3 days apart.

  • Inter-rater reliability (error of measurement)

    Standard Error of the Measurements (SEM), computed as the standard deviation of the measures collected by two independent raters, multiplied by the square root of 1 minus ICC.

    Admission assessment conducted independently by two raters 30-60 minutes apart.

  • Intra-rater reliability (Minimal Detectable Change)

    Minimal Detectable Change at the 95 % confidence level (MDC 95), computed as the SEM multiplied by 1,96 multiplied by the square root of 2.

    Test and Retest assessments, conducted 1-3 days apart.

  • Inter-rater reliability (Minimal Detectable Change)

    Minimal Detectable Change at the 95 % confidence level (MDC 95), computed as the SEM multiplied by 1,96 multiplied by the square root of 2.

    Admission assessment conducted independently by two raters 30-60 minutes apart.

  • Criterion Validity - Association with reference standard at admission.

    Estimation of the correlation between the MI-Italian and Motricity subsection of the Fugl Meyer Assessment (FMA) scale, separately for upper limb and lower limb.

    Admission assessment (T0).

  • Criterion Validity - Association with reference standard at discharge

    Estimation of the correlation between the MI-Italian and Motricity subsection of the Fugl Meyer Assessment (FMA) scale, separately for upper limb and lower limb.

    Discharge (T1) assessment. Time of discharge will vary among participants, so a definite time point cannot be stated. On average, discharge is expected after 30 days from admission.

  • Construct validity (Hypothesis testing) - Association with function at admission

    Estimation of the correlation between the total scores of the MI-Italian and the modified Barthel Index (mBI).

    Admission assessment (T0).

  • Construct validity (Hypothesis testing) - Association with function at discharge.

    Estimation of the correlation between the total scores of the MI-Italian and the modified Barthel Index (mBI).

    Discharge (T1) assessment. Time of discharge will vary among participants, so a definite time point cannot be stated. On average, discharge is expected after 30 days from admission.

  • Responsiveness (change of MI-Italian scores from admission to discharge) - Standardized Response Mean (SRM).

    For each subject, the change score at the MI-Italian will be calculated as the difference between T1 and T0 assessment. The SRM will be calculated as the ratio of observed change and the standard deviation reflecting the variability of the change scores, both in the whole sample and separately in groups with different outcome based on the Global Rating of Perceived Change (GRPC).

    Admission (T0) and Discharge (T1) assessment. Time of discharge will vary among participants, so a definite time point cannot be stated. On average, discharge is expected after 30 days from admission.

  • Responsiveness (change of MI-Italian scores from admission to discharge) - Guyatt Responsiveness Index (GRI)

    For each subject, the change score at the MI-Italian will be calculated as the difference between T1 and T0 assessment. The GRI will be calculated as the ratio of the mean change score difference between improved and stable patients and the standard deviation of the individual change scores in stable patients. Improved and stable patients will be detected based on the GRPC.

    Admission (T0) and Discharge (T1) assessment. Time of discharge will vary among participants, so a definite time point cannot be stated. On average, discharge is expected after 30 days from admission.

  • Responsiveness (change of MI-Italian scores from admission to discharge) - Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID).

    For each subject, the change score at the MI-Italian will be calculated as the difference between T1 and T0 assessment. The Receiving Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve approach will be used to estimate the minimal change score associated with clinically important change (i.e., the MCID), using the GRPC as an anchor.

    Admission (T0) and Discharge (T1) assessment. Time of discharge will vary among participants, so a definite time point cannot be stated. On average, discharge is expected after 30 days from admission.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

A) In the pilot-testing, the pre-final MI-Italian will be tested for clarity on a sample of 10 health professionals (physicians and physiotherapists) working in stroke rehabilitation. B) The metric properties of the final MI-italian will be tested on a sample of at least 100 patients who had a stroke. Considering a possible dropout rate of 15 percent, 115 subjects are expected to be enrolled.

You may qualify if:

  • being a physician or a physiotherapist with at least three years of experience in the functional assessment of subjects with stroke
  • willingness to participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • B) Study on the metric properties of the final MI-Italian
  • Participants (subjects who had a stroke): all subject consecutively admitted to the Don Gnocchi Foundation of Florence for rehabilitation after stroke (until the expected sample size is completed) who meet the following criteria.
  • age 18 years or older
  • stroke outcomes such that they impact the person's ability to independently perform various basic activities of daily living
  • willingness to participate in the study, with informed consent signed (by the support administrator/legal guardian, if necessary)
  • severe visual and/or auditory impairment that cannot be corrected
  • cognitive impairment defined by a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score \<21;
  • severe language impairment such that comprehension and performance of the task is prevented
  • presence of signs of clinical instability, defined by a score greater than zero on the Clinical Instability Scale Raters: ten physiotherapists with at least three years of experience in the evaluation and treatment of subjects with stroke outcomes. Pairs of raters, equal in number to the number of patients enrolled, will be randomly drawn from this group, and each pair will be randomly assigned to a patient to be administered the MI-Italian Other examiners, also randomly drawn from the list of ten raters, will administer other clinical scales to participants to assess the validity of the MI-Italian.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (13)

  • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. No abstract available.

    PMID: 11124735BACKGROUND
  • Bertrand AM, Fournier K, Wick Brasey MG, Kaiser ML, Frischknecht R, Diserens K. Reliability of maximal grip strength measurements and grip strength recovery following a stroke. J Hand Ther. 2015 Oct-Dec;28(4):356-62; quiz 363. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 May 9.

    PMID: 26206167BACKGROUND
  • Cameron D, Bohannon RW. Criterion validity of lower extremity Motricity Index scores. Clin Rehabil. 2000 Apr;14(2):208-11. doi: 10.1191/026921500675786655.

    PMID: 10763800BACKGROUND
  • Collin C, Wade D. Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990 Jul;53(7):576-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.53.7.576.

    PMID: 2391521BACKGROUND
  • Demeurisse G, Demol O, Robaye E. Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. Eur Neurol. 1980;19(6):382-9. doi: 10.1159/000115178.

    PMID: 7439211BACKGROUND
  • Fayazi M, Dehkordi SN, Dadgoo M, Salehi M. Test-retest reliability of Motricity Index strength assessments for lower extremity in post stroke hemiparesis. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2012 Feb;26(1):27-30.

    PMID: 23483112BACKGROUND
  • Gor-Garcia-Fogeda MD, Molina-Rueda F, Cuesta-Gomez A, Carratala-Tejada M, Alguacil-Diego IM, Miangolarra-Page JC. Scales to assess gross motor function in stroke patients: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jun;95(6):1174-83. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.02.013. Epub 2014 Feb 28.

    PMID: 24582618BACKGROUND
  • Jacob-Lloyd HA, Dunn OM, Brain ND, Lamb SE. Effective Measurement of the Functional Progress of Stroke Clients. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2005;68(6):253-259. doi:10.1177/030802260506800603

    BACKGROUND
  • Lin C, Arevalo YA, Harvey RL, Prabhakaran S, Martin KD. The minimal clinically important difference of the motricity index score. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2023 Apr;30(3):298-303. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2022.2031532. Epub 2022 Jan 30.

    PMID: 35094664BACKGROUND
  • Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Apr;17(2):268-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x. Epub 2010 Sep 28.

    PMID: 20874835BACKGROUND
  • Sunderland A, Tinson D, Bradley L, Hewer RL. Arm function after stroke. An evaluation of grip strength as a measure of recovery and a prognostic indicator. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989 Nov;52(11):1267-72. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.52.11.1267.

    PMID: 2592969BACKGROUND
  • Vos-Vromans DC, de Bie RA, Erdmann PG, van Meeteren NL. The responsiveness of the ten-meter walking test and other measures in patients with hemiparesis in the acute phase. Physiother Theory Pract. 2005 Jul-Sep;21(3):173-80. doi: 10.1080/09593980500212920.

    PMID: 16389698BACKGROUND
  • Wade DT, Hewer RL. Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987 Feb;50(2):177-82. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.50.2.177.

    PMID: 3572432BACKGROUND

Central Study Contacts

Marco Baccini, MSc

CONTACT

Diego Longo, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2023

First Posted

April 25, 2023

Study Start

May 15, 2023

Primary Completion

December 15, 2023

Study Completion

February 15, 2024

Last Updated

April 25, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-01