CULTURAL ADAPTATION AND PSYCHOMETRIC TESTING OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF FUGL-MEYER ASSESSMENT
FMA-TR
1 other identifier
observational
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this methodological study is to adapt the Fugl-Meyer assessment to Turkish culture and to test its validity and reliability in acute phase stroke patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Dec 2023
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 9, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 21, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 15, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2024
CompletedMay 4, 2026
April 1, 2026
8 months
April 9, 2023
April 28, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Barthel Index
a scale used to assess functional independence. Points ranging from 0 to 100.
5 minutes
Modified Rankin Scale
a 6 point disability scale with possible scores ranging from 0 to 5
5 minutes
Fugl-Meyer Assessment (Upper and Lower Extremity Form)
a 3 point ordinal scale that evaluates sensorimotor function, coordination, pROM and pain
45 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Berg Balance Scale
10 minutes
Eligibility Criteria
Stroke patients who were hospitalized in Istinye University Liv Hospital Brain Angiography Stroke Center between May 2023 to December 2023.
You may qualify if:
- Patients who diagnosed with stroke
- Less than 1 month passed after onset of stroke
- Upper and lower extremity motor involvement between Brunnstrom stages 2 and 5
- Voluntarily accepting to participate in this research
You may not qualify if:
- Visual and hearing impairment
- Upper or lower extremity amputation
- Significant cognitive impairment (Mini Mental State Test Score \< 18)
- Mental disorders affecting daily life functioning
- Global aphasia
- Other unstable conditions that may affect participation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
İstinye University Brain Angiography Stroke Center
Istanbul, Esenyurt, 34510, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (16)
Baker K, Cano SJ, Playford ED. Outcome measurement in stroke: a scale selection strategy. Stroke. 2011 Jun;42(6):1787-94. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.608505. Epub 2011 May 12.
PMID: 21566236BACKGROUNDBeaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. No abstract available.
PMID: 11124735BACKGROUNDBushnell C, Bettger JP, Cockroft KM, Cramer SC, Edelen MO, Hanley D, Katzan IL, Mattke S, Nilsen DM, Piquado T, Skidmore ER, Wing K, Yenokyan G. Chronic Stroke Outcome Measures for Motor Function Intervention Trials: Expert Panel Recommendations. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Oct;8(6 Suppl 3):S163-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002098.
PMID: 26515205BACKGROUNDCarr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L, Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther. 1985 Feb;65(2):175-80. doi: 10.1093/ptj/65.2.175.
PMID: 3969398BACKGROUNDde Vet HC, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;59(10):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.015. Epub 2006 Aug 10.
PMID: 16980142BACKGROUNDDeyo RA, Centor RM. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis. 1986;39(11):897-906. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90038-x.
PMID: 2947907BACKGROUNDDuncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther. 1983 Oct;63(10):1606-10. doi: 10.1093/ptj/63.10.1606.
PMID: 6622535BACKGROUNDFugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31.
PMID: 1135616BACKGROUNDGladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002 Sep;16(3):232-40. doi: 10.1177/154596802401105171.
PMID: 12234086BACKGROUNDMalouin F, Pichard L, Bonneau C, Durand A, Corriveau D. Evaluating motor recovery early after stroke: comparison of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the Motor Assessment Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Nov;75(11):1206-12. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90006-x.
PMID: 7979930BACKGROUNDMayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ahmed S, Gordon C, Higgins J, McEwen S, Salbach N. Disablement following stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 1999 May-Jun;21(5-6):258-68. doi: 10.1080/096382899297684.
PMID: 10381238BACKGROUNDAlt Murphy M, Resteghini C, Feys P, Lamers I. An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke. BMC Neurol. 2015 Mar 11;15:29. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0292-6.
PMID: 25880033BACKGROUNDSalter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, Foley NC, Bitensky J. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Body Functions. Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Feb 18;27(4):191-207. doi: 10.1080/09638280400008537.
PMID: 15824050BACKGROUNDSee J, Dodakian L, Chou C, Chan V, McKenzie A, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Cramer SC. A standardized approach to the Fugl-Meyer assessment and its implications for clinical trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Oct;27(8):732-41. doi: 10.1177/1545968313491000. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
PMID: 23774125BACKGROUNDTerwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012. Epub 2006 Aug 24.
PMID: 17161752BACKGROUNDThe World Health Organization MONICA Project (monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease): a major international collaboration. WHO MONICA Project Principal Investigators. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(2):105-14. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90084-4.
PMID: 3335877BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lide Z Uz, 1
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 9, 2023
First Posted
April 21, 2023
Study Start
December 15, 2023
Primary Completion
August 15, 2024
Study Completion
December 1, 2024
Last Updated
May 4, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04