Risk and Aesthetic Assesment in Implant Patient
EIPPDRAAS
Evaluation of Implant Patients by Peri-implant Disease Risk Analysis and Aesthetic Score
1 other identifier
observational
298
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study examines the peri-implant risk assessment diagram and the aesthetic, peri-implant health status, and gingival level around the implant in patients with implants by comparing them in smokers and non-smokers. : After completion of the examination, 298 dental implants for at least three months after functional prosthesis loading, except for patients with bruxism and uncontrolled diabetes, were included in the study. Patients are primarily divided into smokers and non-smokers. In all implant patients, plaque, gingival index, bleeding on probing, pocket depth, clinical attachment loss, gingival recession, keratinized thickness, keratinized width, vestibule depth, pink aesthetic score, and peri-implant disease risk analysis are evaluated in sequence.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jul 2022
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 4, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 5, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 5, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 8, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 21, 2023
CompletedFebruary 4, 2025
February 1, 2025
6 months
April 8, 2023
February 2, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Implant disease risk assesment
The IDRA algorithm is a promising tool to assess patients at moderate or high risk of developing peri-implantitis. The eight vectors of the diagram include: an assessment of a history of periodontitis, the percentage of sites with bleeding on probing (BOP), the number of teeth/implants with probing depths (PD) ≥5 mm, the ratio of periodontal bone loss (evaluated from a radiograph) divided by the patient's age, periodontitis susceptibility as described by the staging and grading categories from the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases , the frequency/compliance with supportive periodontal therapy, the distance from the restorative margin of the implant-supported prosthesis to the marginal bone crest, and prosthesis related factors including cleanability and fit of the implant-supported prosthesis.
baseline
Pink esthetic scale
With the pink aesthetic score, the post-implant process is scored according to the papilla, tissue contours, gingival level, alveolar process, color, and tissue condition. The thresholds for clinical acceptance, which was currently set at values of 8/14 for the PES. The thresholds for clinical acceptance are currently set at values of 8 to 14 for the PES.
baseline
Dental implant health scale
The Implant Quality of The Health Scale allows the dentist to evaluate an implant using the listed criteria, place it in the appropriate category of health or disease, and then treat the implant accordingly. Three primary classes were established by the Consensus: success, survival, and failure. The success category describes optimum conditions, the survival category describes implants still in function but not with ideal conditions, and the loss of an implant represents an the implant that should be or already has been removed. Implant Quality Scale Group Clinical Conditions 1. Success (optimum health) a) No pain or tenderness upon function b) 0 mobility c) \<2 mm radiographic bone loss from initial surgery d) No exudates history 2. Satisfactory survival a) No pain on function b) 0 mobility c) 2-4 mm radiographic bone loss d) No exudates history 3. Compromised survival a) May have sensitivity on function b) No mobility c) Radiographic bone loss\> 4 mm(less than ½ of implant
baseline
Keratinized tissue thickness
It is advanced to the bone with a canal file. The distance between the stopper and the tip of the file is measured.
baseline
Keratinized tissue width
Keratinized mucosa width was defined as the distance between the gingival margin and mucogingival junction at the mid-buccal area
baseline
Periodontal depth
Measuring the distance from the gingival margin to the mucogingival line with a periodontal probe.
baseline
Bleeding on probing
To determine the bleeding index on probing, the pocket floor, and the inflammatory state of the pocket epithelium, an evaluation is made according to whether there is bleeding in the sulcus 30 seconds after the pocket depth measurement from 6 regions of all the teeth of the patients: mesiobuccal, mid-buccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, mid-lingual and distolingual.
baseline
Vestibular depth
Vestibular depth is measured either from crest of lip or from coronal border of the attached gingiva to depth of mucobuccal fold.
baseline
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Plaque index
baseline
Gingival index
baseline
Clinical attachment level
baseline
Gingival recession
baseline
Eligibility Criteria
298 dental implants for at least 6 months after functional prosthetic loading were included in the study. Patients are primarily divided into smokers and non-smokers.
You may qualify if:
- years old patients
- Patients who are systemically healthy and have a controlled medical condition
- Patients with fixed prosthesis on the implant at least 6 months after the functional prosthetic loading of the dental implant
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with uncontrolled systemic diseases
- Those who have the habit of bruxism
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University
Bolu, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ramazan Kurul, Ass. Prof
Abant Izzet Baysal University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 8, 2023
First Posted
April 21, 2023
Study Start
July 4, 2022
Primary Completion
January 5, 2023
Study Completion
January 5, 2023
Last Updated
February 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02