Sutures for Treatment of Knee Arthroscopy
Absorbable Versus Nonabsorbable Sutures for the Treatment of Knee Arthroscopy: A Prospective Comparison of Patient Outcomes and Satisfaction
1 other identifier
interventional
274
1 country
1
Brief Summary
For a knee arthroscopy, two small incisions are made at the level of the joint line on each side of the patellar tendon. Closure of surgical incisions consists of using either nonabsorbable or absorbable sutures. Some surgeons prefer using nonabsorbable sutures due to it being easier to tie, these sutures are less likely to break prematurely, and that they elicit a minimal inflammatory response. On the other hand, some surgeons prefer using absorbable sutures due to the time savings of not having to remove the sutures at a later date and that these sutures decrease patient anxiety and discomfort. The purpose of this study is to prospectively investigate and compare patient's pain, swelling and cosmesis following knee arthroscopy surgery between patients who had their arthroscopy portals closed using resorbable sutures vs. patients who had their portals closed using nonabsorbable sutures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 18, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 9, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 9, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 10, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 21, 2023
CompletedApril 21, 2023
April 1, 2023
4.4 years
April 10, 2023
April 10, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Postoperative Pain Leveles
Pain levels will be recorded through the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
3 months
Patient Satisfaction
Satisfaction will be measures with customized questions regarding the overall satisfaction of their incision (on a scale of 0 to 10), satisfaction of the suture removal process, complications and swelling
3 months
Study Arms (2)
would closure using absorbable sutures
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatients randomized into the absorbable suture group will have their incisions closed with 3.0 monocryl sutures
would closure using non-absorbable sutures
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients randomized into the nonabsorbable suture group will have their incisions closed with either a 3.0 nylon suture
Interventions
incision will be closed with absorbable suture
incision will be closed with non-absorbable suture
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients ages 18 and older undergoing primary knee arthroscopy for diagnostic arthroscopy, removal of a loose body, chondroplasty, or a partial meniscectomy will be included in this analysis
You may not qualify if:
- Patients undergoing revision knee arthroscopy as well as patients undergoing ACL reconstruction or meniscal repair surgery will be excluded from this analysis.
- Patients under the age of 18 will be excluded as well.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Rothman Orthopaedic Institute
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 10, 2023
First Posted
April 21, 2023
Study Start
November 18, 2018
Primary Completion
April 9, 2023
Study Completion
April 9, 2023
Last Updated
April 21, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04