NCT05821673

Brief Summary

Objective of the present study was to assess the peri-implant soft tissue profiles between argon plasma pre-treated (PT) and non-treated (NPT) abutments by comparing clinical and histological parameters 2 months after abutment placement.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 21, 2021

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 18, 2021

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2022

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 7, 2023

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 20, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

April 20, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

April 7, 2023

Last Update Submit

April 7, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Histological and immunohistochemical assessment

    soft peri-implant tissues and abutment were harvested and histologically processedSpecialized stainings (hematoxylin eosin and picrocirious red) coupled with immunohistochemistry (vimentin, collagen, and CK10) were performed to assess soft tissue inflammation and healing, as well as the collagen content keratinization.

    2 months after abutment placement

  • Plaque index (PI)

    PI scores were recorded in 6 points around each abutment, averaged, and expressed in %. PI was evaluated with a score of 0,1,2, 3 depending on the amount of plaque at each site.

    2 months after abutment placement

  • Bleeding on probing (BoP)

    BoP scores were recorded in 6 points around each abutment, averaged, and expressed in %.BoP was used as a dichotomous variable

    2 months after abutment placement

Study Arms (4)

abutments with machine surface

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

abutments with machine surface characterized by circular micro-threads with a furrow of less than 2 um

Procedure: Argon plasma pre-treated abutment insertionProcedure: abutment insertion

abutments with rough Ultrathin Threaded Microsurface

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

abutments with rough Ultrathin Threaded Microsurface with a triangular contour tread with a pitch of 50 μm

Procedure: Argon plasma pre-treated abutment insertionProcedure: abutment insertion

argon plasma pre-treated (PT) abutments

EXPERIMENTAL

abutments with rough Ultrathin Threaded Microsurface and abutments with machine surface were pretreated with Argon Plasma

Procedure: Argon plasma pre-treated abutment insertion

non treated abutments

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

abutments with rough Ultrathin Threaded Microsurface and abutments with machine surface without Argon Plasma pretreatment.

Procedure: abutment insertion

Interventions

abutments allocated to the test group were placed in an Argon plasma reactor (Diener Electronic GmbH, Jettingen, Germany) for decontamination and activation. In order to restrict any post-treatment contamination; abutments were inserted immediately after the end of the plasma process. The reactor was set at 75 W of power and -10 MPa of pressure for 12 min.

abutments with machine surfaceabutments with rough Ultrathin Threaded Microsurfaceargon plasma pre-treated (PT) abutments

the abutments assigned to the control group were screwed onto the implants without receiving argon plasma pretreatment

abutments with machine surfaceabutments with rough Ultrathin Threaded Microsurfacenon treated abutments

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient requiring implant supported restoration.
  • Residual alveolar bone width of edentulous jaw of \> 8mm.
  • Keratinized mucosa width of \>6mm
  • Males and females between 18-80 years old
  • Patients with healthy periodontal conditions (Treated periodontitis, PI\<25%, BoP\<25%)
  • Patients that are willing to sign an informed consent and participate in a clinical study
  • Generally fit and healthy and able to undergo oral surgical procedures under local anesthesia.
  • Teeth at the surgical site which required removal were extracted a minimum of 12 weeks prior to sinus floor elevation

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who smoke over 10 cigarettes/day
  • Pregnancy (confirmed by verbal inquiry)
  • Chronic systemic pathologies (e.g. diabetes) and neoplastic of the Oro-Facial District 4.
  • Patients taking bisphosphonates
  • Any sites where an implant already failed sites
  • Untreated Periodontitis
  • Dental sites with acute infections
  • Chronic inflammatory diseases of the oral cavity
  • Autoimmune diseases (cortisone intake)
  • Allergy declared to one or more medicaments to be used during treatment
  • Alcoholics patients and/or drug addicts.
  • History or malignant tumours of the maxillary sinus
  • History of local radiation therapy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Studio Odont.Associato Dr.P.Cicchese E L.Canullo

Rome, Italy/Rome, 00198, Italy

Location

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
the histologist was blinded
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants received either abutments with machine surface characterized by circular micro-threads with a furrow of less than 2 um (surface roughness: Ra=0.2 and Sa=0.11) or abutments with rough Ultrathin Threaded Microsurface with a triangular contour tread with a pitch of 50 μm (surface roughness: Ra=0.62 and Sa=0.60) abutments allocated to the test group were placed in an Argon plasma reactor (Diener Electronic GmbH, Jettingen, Germany) for decontamination and activation. in control group were allocated argon plasma non-treated abutmentsParticipants underwent 2-level randomization for allocation of abutments with different surface configurations and experimental treatment using permuted block technique to limit any selection bias. Allocation concealment was preserved by sealing the tested abutments in sterile envelopes sealed in opaque sleeves opened at the time of the second surgical step.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
principal investigator; DDS PHD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2023

First Posted

April 20, 2023

Study Start

June 21, 2021

Primary Completion

December 18, 2021

Study Completion

June 30, 2022

Last Updated

April 20, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-04

Locations