NCT05821465

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to compare the heart signals that are received by a new heart monitoring device called the HeartWatch to heart signals that are recorded by existing monitors used in cardiology clinics today. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:

  1. 1.Does the HeartWatch recording allow characterization of tagged and abnormal arrhythmia events that are equivalent to the existing Event Recorder and Holter devices?
  2. 2.Does the HeartWatch recording allow for detection of QRS complexes that are equivalent to the predicate Holter lead I reference signal? Participants who have been recommended to receive a heart monitor for heart rhythm assessment will asked to wear the HeartWatch armband monitor at the same time as the standard heart monitor. They will be asked to flag symptoms (if they occur) on either the HeartWatch or on the Helpwear Smartphone. When their monitoring session for the standard heart monitor is complete, then the monitoring session for the HeartWatch armband is also complete.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
144

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 24, 2023

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 20, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2023

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 18, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 18, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

July 22, 2024

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

March 24, 2023

Last Update Submit

July 18, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • HeartWatch arrhythmia event characterization accuracy

    An arrhythmia diagnosis will be applied to all patient-tagged (symptomatic) events (HeartWatch, Event Recorder, and Holter) and all abnormal significant rhythm auto-triggered events (HeartWatch and Event Recorder) and recorded events (HeartWatch and Holter). For the HeartWatch to be considered comparable to the Holter and Event Recorder, the accuracy of the HeartWatch to categorize the correct arrhythmia must be \> 85% of the combined Holter and Event Recorder data.

    Events will be assessed for the duration of time each participants wears the HeartWatch and holter/event recorder, up to 48 hours.

  • HeartWatch recording accuracy of QRS complexes

    To be considered comparable to the Holter, the HeartWatch must detect \> 90% of the QRS complexes recorded on the Holter lead I reference ECG signal

    QRS complexes will be assessed for the duration of time each participants wears the HeartWatch and the holter monitor up to 48 hours.

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Does the HeartWatch differ from the Event Recorder and Holter monitor in terms of adverse events?

    Events will be assessed up to 48 hours of the patient wearing the HeartWatch.

  • Evaluate if the HeartWatch will be similarly preferred to the Event Recorder and Holter monitor.

    Up to 48 hours

  • The 10-minute averaged and paired PR/QRS intervals from the HeartWatch will be within 20 msec of the 10-minute averaged PR/QRS intervals from lead I of the Holter for at the same time points

    Up to 48 hours.

  • the 10-minute averaged and paired QT intervals from the HeartWatch will be within 40 msec of the 10-minute averaged QT intervals from lead I of the Holter.

    Up to 48 hours.

Study Arms (2)

HeartWatch vs. Event Recorder

All patient-tagged (symptomatic) events recorded by the HeartWatch, and reference devices (Event Recorder) and all non-normal clinically significant rhythm auto-triggered and recorded events will be adjudicated and classified using literature-based definitions.

Device: HeartWatch

HeartWatch vs. Holter

All patient-tagged (symptomatic) events recorded by the HeartWatch, and reference devices (Holter) and all non-normal clinically significant rhythm auto-triggered and recorded events will be adjudicated and classified using literature-based definitions.

Device: HeartWatch

Interventions

The HeartWatch monitoring device will be worn on the upper left arm for the same duration or up to 48 hours that the standard event recorder or holter monitor is worn. The subject will be provided with a HelpWear smartphone that is paired to the monitor and only used by the participant to tag any events that they may have during the Heartwatch monitoring session.

HeartWatch vs. Event RecorderHeartWatch vs. Holter

Eligibility Criteria

Age22 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Consecutive patients referred for extended ambulatory ECG monitoring will be approached for participation. A total of 150 subjects will be enrolled into the two parallel studies, 50 subjects in the HeartWatch vs Event recorder and 100 subjects in HeartWatch vs Holter monitor.

You may qualify if:

  • At least 22 years of age at time of consent
  • Clinically indicated for an Event Recorder or Holter
  • Able to follow the protocol
  • Provision of written-informed consent
  • No functional implantable pacemaker or defibrillator
  • Left bicep circumference \> 22 cm and \< 45 cm

You may not qualify if:

  • Known allergy to any component of the Event Recorder
  • Known allergy to any component of the Holter monitor
  • Known allergy to any component of the HeartWatch
  • Dextrocardia
  • Implanted functional Pacemaker of Defibrillator
  • Left bicep circumference \< 22 cm
  • Left bicep circumference \> 45 cm

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Foothills Medical Centre

Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Arrhythmias, CardiacSyncopeDizziness

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsUnconsciousnessConsciousness DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsSensation Disorders

Study Officials

  • Derek Exner, MD

    HelpWear Inc.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 24, 2023

First Posted

April 20, 2023

Study Start

July 1, 2023

Primary Completion

July 18, 2024

Study Completion

July 18, 2024

Last Updated

July 22, 2024

Record last verified: 2023-04

Locations