Potential of Moderate Whole Body Hyperthermia to Enhance Response
POWER
Moderate Whole-body Hyperthermia in Tumor Patients: Influence on Circulating Tumor Cells, Tumor Response, Quality of Life, Fatigue, Psyche, Immune Response and Tumor Microenvironment
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Using moderate whole-body hyperthermia (mWBH) in tumor patients to see the influence on circulating tumor cells, tumor response, quality of life, fatigue, psyche, immune response and tumor microenvironment
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Feb 2023
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 7, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 20, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
April 20, 2023
April 1, 2023
3.8 years
February 7, 2023
April 6, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
change in the number of circulating tumor cells before therapy vs after therapy
ANCOVA is used as the statistical methodology. The change in the number of circulating tumor cells three months after the start of therapy is the dependent variable, the group (intervention or control) and the number of circulating tumor cells as well as the tumor entity (6 groups) are independent variables. Case number estimation: So far there are no studies that have examined this outcome. We assume that the intervention effect is moderate and that an effect size of 0.6 to 0.7 can be achieved. If 36 patients per arm are included in the study, an effect size (Cohen's d) of 0.67 or greater at a two-sided significance level of α=0.05 with a power of 80% can be demonstrated using the t-test for independent samples.
Test therapy naive versus three months after the start of therapy
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Response of the tumors
three months after the start of therapy
Quality of life of the patients
measured before and 2 weeks after the end of therapy (end of therapy is determined as the last planned mWBH session) or at a comparable time in the control group
influence of mWBH on depressive/dysthymic moods/episodes as well as on fatigue symptoms
Follow-up visits, in total 2 years follow up time
impact of patient-reported organ-specific functional impairment
Follow-up visits, in total 2 years follow up time
influence of mWBH on different leukocyte sub-populations and the plasma concentration of cytokines/proteins, which indicate a suspected predictive effect on the response to immunotherapy.
measurement before treatment compared with the one after treatment
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
mWBH
EXPERIMENTALpatients receiving moderate Whole Body Hyperthermia
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONPatients do not receive moderate Whole Body Hyperthermia
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The general condition of the patients must be sufficient for multimodal treatment (corresponding to WHO status 0-2)
- Tumordisease in a palliative setting of the following 6 groups:
- Malignant melanoma, treatment-naive stage IV with multiple metastases and missing BRAF-V600 mutation. With indication for initiation of immunotherapy using PD-1 and CTLA-4 antibody therapy.
- Patients with metastatic or inoperable pancreatic cancer, who are planning first-line chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX is.
- Patients with an indication for palliative radiation therapy extracranial, tumor manifestation with a prescribed radiation dose of 30 to 36 Gy due to hormone receptor-positive carcinoma of the breast, patients must have at least one additional (marker) lesion not treated with radiation.
- Patients with metastatic high-grade sarcoma for whom metastasis-directed ablative therapy methods are not possible and palliative first-line therapy with doxorubicin.
- Patients with metastatic or loco-regionally recurrent HPV-associated squamous cell carcinoma (of the head and neck region, cervix, anus or vulva) for whom local therapies are not possible and for whom palliative first-line therapy containing platinum is planned.
- Patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer, with progressive disease after exceeding the recommended therapy options for which a therapy attempt with lutetium-177-PSMA was indicated.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of contraindications to simultaneous chemotherapy or whole-body hyperthermia
- Serious or active comorbidities that could interfere with treatment or understanding of the nature and content of the study, for example:
- Chronic inflammatory bowel disease
- Acute infections
- Serious cardiovascular or pulmonary comorbidities
- Mental illnesses, showing the proper Study participation or recording the nature of the study to make impossible
- Presence of cerebral metastasis
- Diabetes mellitus with risk of end-organ damage
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie
Berlin, 13353, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PD Dr. Sebastian Zschaeck
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 7, 2023
First Posted
April 20, 2023
Study Start
February 1, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
April 20, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share