Acceptability and Efficacy of Pain Reprocessing Therapy in Racially/ Ethnically Diverse Adults With Chronic Back Pain
Feasibility and Acceptability of Pain Reprocessing Therapy in Racially/ Ethnically Diverse Adults With Chronic Back Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn which treatment works better for adults with chronic pain. This study is comparing three treatments: Pain Reprocessing Therapy (PRT), Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), and usual care (whatever a person is already doing to cope with their pain). The study's main questions are:
- Does PRT work well for adults with chronic pain?
- Which treatment works better for lowering pain: PRT, CBT, or usual care? This study will compare PRT, CBT, and usual care to see which is most helpful for lowering pain and helping with other problems that people with chronic pain can have.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2023
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 16, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 12, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 19, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 25, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2026
ExpectedSeptember 4, 2025
August 1, 2025
2.4 years
March 16, 2023
August 27, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pain intensity
Last-week average pain intensity is assessed via the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF). The BPI-SF assess pain severity and its impact on functioning. It consists of 9 total items including 4 pain items and 5 pain interference items. The 4 pain items measure pain in the last week on a numerical rating scale of 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
Primary time point is the day after post-treatment, 1.5 months on average
Session Attendance
Session attendance is a feasibility measure calculated as the proportion or percentage of people randomized to either PRT or CBT who attended at least 6 sessions.
This value will be calculated a day after post-treatment for the last participant, approximately 1 year from the start of enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Pain interference
Primary time point is the day after post-treatment, 1.5 months on average
Depression
Primary time point is the day after post-treatment, 1.5 months on average
Positive Affect
Primary time point is the day after post-treatment, 1.5 months on average
Anxiety
Primary time point is the day after post-treatment, 1.5 months on average
Anger
Primary time point is the day after post-treatment, 1.5 months on average
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Pain reprocessing therapy (PRT)
EXPERIMENTALPRT has 5 components: 1) education about the origin of pain in the brain, its reversibility, and the pain-fear cycle; 2) reinforcing education using personal biography; 3) "somatic tracking" of pain through mindfulness and reappraisal of pain sensations as non-dangerous; 4) lowering the level of personal threat that may trigger pain sensation; and 5) inducing positive affect in periods of pain. Patients will attend 1 assessment and education telehealth session with a physician followed by 8, 50-minute, therapist-led sessions. Pacing will be flexible, ranging from 5-12 weeks, to increase accessibility. Treatment will be provided by experienced PRT clinicians. All PRT sessions will be remotely-delivered.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain (CBT-CP)
ACTIVE COMPARATORCBT-CP, considered the leading psychological treatment for chronic pain, is a structured, time-limited intervention that aims to teach patients how to better manage chronic pain and improve their quality of life. Participants will receive 9, 50-minute sessions of CBT-CP over 5 - 12 weeks. The VA CBT-CP protocol contains an initial orientation involving education and familiarization with the CBT-CP approach to chronic pain. The protocol then includes sessions that focus on topics such as exercise, relaxation, pleasant activities, cognitive coping, and sleep. All CBT-CP sessions will be remotely-delivered.
Usual Care
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will be asked to continue whatever they are already doing to care for their back pain. Length of the usual care condition will be 5 weeks, the expected mean completion time of the PRT and CBT arms, and may be adjusted at mid-enrollment to match treatment arm length more closely.
Interventions
A promising new psychotherapy for chronic pain
A psychotherapy for chronic pain that has 30+ years of research support.
Participants will be asked to continue to do whatever they are currently doing to manage their pain
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Last-week average back pain of at least 4 of 10 at the two pretreatment timepoints (online pre-screening and informed consent session)
- Back pain that is an ongoing problem for at least half the days of the last 6 months
- Back pain that is worse than leg pain.
You may not qualify if:
- Current litigation or compensation associated with pain or plans to apply for compensation or engage in litigation in the next 6 months
- Active suicidal ideation with intent, recent history of suicide attempt, or recent history of suicide attempts or self-harm behaviors within the past 5 years (including non-suicidal self-harm)
- Recent history of inpatient psychiatric hospitalization within the past 5 years
- Active, current psychosis or mania
- Active, current substance abuse, or problems with substance abuse within the past 2 years
- Instability in living conditions or major interfering life events:
- Major surgery or other major medical event planned in coming six months
- Unsure whether will reliably have suitable conditions for telehealth appointments over the next two months, including a computer or tablet, reliable fast internet, and a quiet comfortable room that is reliably available.
- Major, interfering changes in employment or housing anticipated over the next six months
- Failure to complete at least 85% (6 of 7) of EMA surveys in the first week of the study (post-consent, pre-randomization)
- Leg pain worse than back pain
- Back surgery within the last 2 years
- Difficulty controlling bladder function (to screen out cauda equina syndrome)
- Serious medical illness (e.g., current, or recent cancer diagnosis, severe cardiovascular disease)
- Recent large unexplained, unintended weight loss (20lbs or more)
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jonathan K. Ashar, Ph.D.
University of Colorado, Denver
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- * Outcome assessment will be completed via automated transmission of a redCAP link, and as such is inherently blinded. * Fidelity assessment will be conducted by blinded fidelity assessors who are otherwise not involved in the study.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 16, 2023
First Posted
April 19, 2023
Study Start
April 12, 2023
Primary Completion
August 25, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Last Updated
September 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Time Frame
- Complete, clean, de-identified copies of the data components described above, along with data dictionaries and metadata, will be publicly posted along with data use agreements by the online publication date of the primary aims in a peer-reviewed journal.
- Access Criteria
- Data Use Agreements will ask users to not attempt to re-identify participants, either by merging in administrative, census, medical, or other data, or by using a software program that might re-identify participants. Investigators will consult as needed with the Cornell Research Data Management Service Group (RDMSG). As described in the Cornell Roybal Center overall data sharing plan, through the Cornell Roybal Center Investigator Development Program investigators will be able to access instruction and assistance to meet other requests for information that ensure research transparency and reproducibility: documentation about study aims; hypotheses/research questions; variable sources (e.g. outcome variables, covariates); measure/index construction; and publication information.
Investigators will share de-identified project data publicly under Data Use Agreements that safeguard individual participant confidentiality and privacy. The study will produce the following types of data. All data will be available for sharing, except where noted, upon the date of the online publication of the results of the primary study aims: * Patient-reported outcomes: All patient-reported outcomes will be de-identified and shared in raw form. * Measures of treatment engagement: Deidentified values (e.g. number of treatment sessions attended) will be shared in raw form. * Audio-video recordings of therapy sessions: These will be used in planned future research. Upon publication of a manuscript referencing these data, deidentified subject-level summary statistics (e.g., metrics of patient-provider vocal synchrony) will be shared.